Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Liangze Jiang

dblp:316/9449 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
4as first author
6since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0003-1757-0117ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 3 first-author · 5 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
4 papers
Trustworthy machine learning · 24% Learning theory · 19% Deep learning architectures and training · 19%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Empirical software engineering · 100%

Topics — the 11 heaviest of 12, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
out-of-distribution generalization
1.622025
OOD-Chameleon: Is Algorithm Selection for OOD Generalization Learnable? · ICML 2025
Unraveling the Key Components of OOD Generalization via Diversification · ICLR 2024
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
activation function
0.912025
Do We Always Need the Simplicity Bias? Looking for Optimal Inductive Biases in the Wild · CVPR 2025
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › activation function
activation function design
0.912025
Do We Always Need the Simplicity Bias? Looking for Optimal Inductive Biases in the Wild · CVPR 2025
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction
algorithm selection
0.912025
OOD-Chameleon: Is Algorithm Selection for OOD Generalization Learnable? · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Learning theory
inductive bias
0.912025
Do We Always Need the Simplicity Bias? Looking for Optimal Inductive Biases in the Wild · CVPR 2025
Machine learning › Learning theory › inductive bias
simplicity bias
0.912025
Do We Always Need the Simplicity Bias? Looking for Optimal Inductive Biases in the Wild · CVPR 2025
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
federated learning
0.712023
Test-Time Robust Personalization for Federated Learning · ICLR 2023
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › federated learning
personalized federated learning
0.712023
Test-Time Robust Personalization for Federated Learning · ICLR 2023
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness
0.712023
Test-Time Robust Personalization for Federated Learning · ICLR 2023
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
test-time adaptation
0.712023
Test-Time Robust Personalization for Federated Learning · ICLR 2023
Empirical software engineering
model selection
0.312025
OOD-Chameleon: Is Algorithm Selection for OOD Generalization Learnable? · ICML 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

multi-label classification · 1.7meta-learning · 0.9ReLU · 0.9GELU · 0.9hypothesis ensembling · 0.8diversification · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Do We Always Need the Simplicity Bias? Looking for Optimal Inductive Biases in the Wild
abstract
Neural architectures tend to fit their data with relatively simple functions. This "simplicity bias" is widely regarded as key to their success. This paper explores the limits of this principle. Building on recent findings that the simplicity bias stems from ReLU activations [96], we introduce a method to meta-learn new activation functions and inductive biases better suited to specific tasks.Findings. We identify multiple tasks where the simplicity bias is inadequate and ReLUs suboptimal. In these cases, we learn new activation functions that perform better by inducing a prior of higher complexity. Interestingly, these cases correspond to domains where neural networks have historically struggled: tabular data, regression tasks, cases of shortcut learning, and algorithmic grokking tasks. In comparison, the simplicity bias induced by ReLUs proves adequate on image tasks where the best learned activations are nearly identical to ReLUs and GeLUs.Implications. Contrary to popular belief, the simplicity bias of ReLU networks is not universally useful. It is near-optimal for image classification, but other inductive biases are sometimes preferable. We showed that activation functions can control these inductive biases, but future tailored architectures might provide further benefits. Advances are still needed to characterize a model’s inductive biases beyond "complexity", and their adequacy with the data.
Damien Teney, Liangze Jiang, Florin Gogianu, Ehsan Abbasnejad
CVPR2
2025 OOD-Chameleon: Is Algorithm Selection for OOD Generalization Learnable?
abstract
Out-of-distribution (OOD) generalization is challenging because distribution shifts come in many forms. Numerous algorithms exist to address specific settings, but *choosing the right training algorithm for the right dataset* without trial and error is difficult. Indeed, real-world applications often involve multiple types and combinations of shifts that are hard to analyze theoretically. **Method.** This work explores the possibility of *learning* the selection of a training algorithm for OOD generalization. We propose a proof of concept (OOD-Chameleon) that formulates the selection as a multi-label classification over candidate algorithms, trained on a *dataset of datasets* representing a variety of shifts. We evaluate the ability of OOD-Chameleon to rank algorithms on unseen shifts and datasets based only on dataset characteristics, i.e., without training models first, unlike traditional model selection. **Findings.** Extensive experiments show that the learned selector identifies high-performing algorithms across synthetic, vision, and language tasks. Further inspection shows that it learns non-trivial decision rules, which provide new insights into the applicability of existing algorithms. Overall, this new approach opens the possibility of better exploiting and understanding the plethora of existing algorithms for OOD generalization.
Liangze Jiang, Damien Teney
ICML1
2025 Optimal Output Synchronization of Euler-Lagrange Systems With Uncertain Time-Varying Quadratic Cost Functions
abstract
In this article, we study the optimal output synchronization problem (OOSP) for uncertain networked Euler-Lagrange (EL) systems. Specifically, the system outputs are expected to be synchronized at the solution of an uncertain distributed time-varying quadratic optimization problem, where each local time-varying cost function includes uncertain parameters. From a centralized perspective, we first develop a controller with adaptive control gains to guide the output of a double-integrator system toward the time-varying optimal solution. By employing the modified average estimators, we extend the centralized design to a distributed implementation to address the OOSP for uncertain EL systems. Using matrix trace properties and composite Lyapunov analysis, we prove that the system outputs can asymptotically converge to the desired time-varying optimal solution. Two examples are used to verify the proposed designs.
Liangze Jiang, Zhengguang Wu, Lei Wang 0059, Yong Xu 0005
IEEE Trans. Cybern.1
2025 Distributed Continuous-Time Optimization With Uncertain Time-Varying Quadratic Cost Functions
abstract
This article studies distributed continuous-time optimization for time-varying quadratic cost functions with uncertain parameters. We first propose a centralized adaptive optimization algorithm using partial information of the cost function. It can be seen that even if there are uncertain parameters in the cost function, exact optimization can still be achieved. To solve this problem in a distributed manner when different local cost functions have identical Hessians, we propose a novel distributed algorithm that cascades the fixed-time average estimator and the distributed optimizer. We remove the requirement for the upper bounds of certain complex functions by integrating state-based gains in the proposed design. We further extend this result to address the distributed optimization where the time-varying cost functions have nonidentical Hessians. We prove the convergence of all the proposed algorithms in the global sense. Numerical examples verify the proposed algorithms.
Liangze Jiang, Zhengguang Wu, Lei Wang 0059
IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Syst.1
2024 Unraveling the Key Components of OOD Generalization via Diversification
abstract
Supervised learning datasets may contain multiple cues that explain the training set equally well, i.e., learning any of them would lead to the correct predictions on the training data. However, many of them can be spurious, i.e., lose their predictive power under a distribution shift and consequently fail to generalize to out-of-distribution (OOD) data. Recently developed "diversification" methods (Lee et al., 2023; Pagliardini et al., 2023) approach this problem by finding multiple diverse hypotheses that rely on different features. This paper aims to study this class of methods and identify the key components contributing to their OOD generalization abilities. We show that (1) diversification methods are highly sensitive to the distribution of the unlabeled data used for diversification and can underperform significantly when away from a method-specific sweet spot. (2) Diversification alone is insufficient for OOD generalization. The choice of the used learning algorithm, e.g., the model's architecture and pretraining, is crucial. In standard experiments (classification on Waterbirds and Office-Home datasets), using the second-best choice leads to an up to 20\% absolute drop in accuracy. (3) The optimal choice of learning algorithm depends on the unlabeled data and vice versa i.e. they are co-dependent. (4) Finally, we show that, in practice, the above pitfalls cannot be alleviated by increasing the number of diverse hypotheses, the major feature of diversification methods. These findings provide a clearer understanding of the critical design factors influencing the OOD generalization abilities of diversification methods. They can guide practitioners in how to use the existing methods best and guide researchers in developing new, better ones.
Harold Benoit, Liangze Jiang, Andrei Atanov, Oguzhan Fatih Kar, Mattia Rigotti, Amir Zamir
ICLR2
2023 Test-Time Robust Personalization for Federated Learning
Liangze Jiang
ICLR1