Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Sihang Zeng

dblp:316/9870 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0003-2921-829XORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Medical and health informatics · 33% Computational social science and digital humanities · 33% Bioinformatics and computational biology · 33%
Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Language models and text generation · 56% Reinforcement learning · 44%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Medical and health informatics › machine learning for healthcare › medical foundation model
medical large language model
0.812024
UltraMedical: Building Specialized Generalists in Biomedicine · NeurIPS 2024
Computational social science and digital humanities
preference learning
0.812024
UltraMedical: Building Specialized Generalists in Biomedicine · NeurIPS 2024
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model › large language model adaptation
supervised fine-tuning
0.212024
UltraMedical: Building Specialized Generalists in Biomedicine · NeurIPS 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

supervised fine-tuning · 1.5reinforcement learning from human feedback · 1.5direct preference optimization · 1.5reinforcement learning · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 ReviewRL: Towards Automated Scientific Review with RL
abstract
Sihang Zeng, Kai Tian, Kaiyan Zhang, Yuru Wang, Junqi Gao, Runze Liu, Sa Yang, Jingxuan Li, Xinwei Long, Jiaheng Ma, Biqing Qi, Bowen Zhou. Proceedings of the 2025 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 2025.
Sihang Zeng, Yuru Wang, Junqi Gao, Runze Liu 0002, Sa Yang, Xinwei Long, Jiaheng Ma, Biqing Qi, Bowen Zhou 0002
EMNLP1
2024 UltraMedical: Building Specialized Generalists in Biomedicine
abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities across various domains and are moving towards more specialized areas. Recent advanced proprietary models such as GPT-4 and Gemini have achieved significant advancements in biomedicine, which have also raised privacy and security challenges. The construction of specialized generalists hinges largely on high-quality datasets, enhanced by techniques like supervised fine-tuning and reinforcement learning from human or AI feedback, and direct preference optimization. However, these leading technologies (e.g., preference learning) are still significantly limited in the open source community due to the scarcity of specialized data. In this paper, we present the UltraMedical collections, which consist of high-quality manual and synthetic datasets in the biomedicine domain, featuring preference annotations across multiple advanced LLMs. By utilizing these datasets, we fine-tune a suite of specialized medical models based on Llama-3 series, demonstrating breathtaking capabilities across various medical benchmarks. Moreover, we develop powerful reward models skilled in biomedical and general reward benchmark, enhancing further online preference learning within the biomedical LLM community.
Sihang Zeng, Ermo Hua, Ning Ding 0002, Zhang-Ren Chen, Zhiyuan Ma 0005, Haoxin Li, Ganqu Cui, Biqing Qi, Xuekai Zhu, Xingtai Lv, Jinfang Hu, Zhiyuan Liu 0001, Bowen Zhou 0002
NeurIPS2
2024 CoRTEx: contrastive learning for representing terms via explanations with applications on constructing biomedical knowledge graphs
abstract
OBJECTIVES: Biomedical Knowledge Graphs play a pivotal role in various biomedical research domains. Concurrently, term clustering emerges as a crucial step in constructing these knowledge graphs, aiming to identify synonymous terms. Due to a lack of knowledge, previous contrastive learning models trained with Unified Medical Language System (UMLS) synonyms struggle at clustering difficult terms and do not generalize well beyond UMLS terms. In this work, we leverage the world knowledge from large language models (LLMs) and propose Contrastive Learning for Representing Terms via Explanations (CoRTEx) to enhance term representation and significantly improves term clustering. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The model training involves generating explanations for a cleaned subset of UMLS terms using ChatGPT. We employ contrastive learning, considering term and explanation embeddings simultaneously, and progressively introduce hard negative samples. Additionally, a ChatGPT-assisted BIRCH algorithm is designed for efficient clustering of a new ontology. RESULTS: We established a clustering test set and a hard negative test set, where our model consistently achieves the highest F1 score. With CoRTEx embeddings and the modified BIRCH algorithm, we grouped 35 580 932 terms from the Biomedical Informatics Ontology System (BIOS) into 22 104 559 clusters with O(N) queries to ChatGPT. Case studies highlight the model's efficacy in handling challenging samples, aided by information from explanations. CONCLUSION: By aligning terms to their explanations, CoRTEx demonstrates superior accuracy over benchmark models and robustness beyond its training set, and it is suitable for clustering terms for large-scale biomedical ontologies.
Huaiyuan Ying, Zhengyun Zhao, Sihang Zeng, Sheng Yu 0002
J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc.4