Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Ziquan Fu

dblp:317/0362 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Knowledge representation and reasoning · 67% Trustworthy machine learning · 33%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
commonsense reasoning
0.712023
Say What You Mean! Large Language Models Speak Too Positively about Negative Commonsense Knowledge · ACL (1) 2023
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › language model interpretability
language model probing
0.712023
Say What You Mean! Large Language Models Speak Too Positively about Negative Commonsense Knowledge · ACL (1) 2023
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › semantic representation
script knowledge
0.712023
Distilling Script Knowledge from Large Language Models for Constrained Language Planning · ACL (1) 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

large language model · 0.7knowledge distillation · 0.7constrained keywords-to-sentence generation · 0.7boolean question answering · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Say What You Mean! Large Language Models Speak Too Positively about Negative Commonsense Knowledge
abstract
Large language models (LLMs) have been widely studied for their ability to store and utilize positive knowledge.However, negative knowledge, such as "lions don't live in the ocean", is also ubiquitous in the world but rarely mentioned explicitly in the text.What do LLMs know about negative knowledge?This work examines the ability of LLMs to negative commonsense knowledge.We design a constrained keywords-to-sentence generation task (CG) and a Boolean question-answering task (QA) to probe LLMs.Our experiments reveal that LLMs frequently fail to generate valid sentences grounded in negative commonsense knowledge, yet they can correctly answer polar yes-or-no questions.We term this phenomenon the belief conflict of LLMs.Our further analysis shows that statistical shortcuts and negation reporting bias from language modeling pre-training cause this conflict.1 * Work done while at Brain Technologies, Inc.
Jiangjie Chen, Ziquan Fu, Sijie Cheng, Lei Li 0005, Yanghua Xiao
ACL (1)3
2023 Distilling Script Knowledge from Large Language Models for Constrained Language Planning
abstract
Siyu Yuan, Jiangjie Chen, Ziquan Fu, Xuyang Ge, Soham Shah, Charles Jankowski, Yanghua Xiao, Deqing Yang. Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2023.
Jiangjie Chen, Ziquan Fu, Xuyang Ge, Soham Shah, Charles Robert Jankowski, Yanghua Xiao, Deqing Yang
ACL (1)3