Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jia Qing Tan

dblp:317/1012 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Vision and language · 100%
Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Visualization and visual analytics · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › Vision and language › visual question answering
chart question answering
0.612022
OpenCQA: Open-ended Question Answering with Charts · EMNLP 2022
Computer vision › Vision and language
visual question answering
0.612022
OpenCQA: Open-ended Question Answering with Charts · EMNLP 2022
Visualization and visual analytics › visualization literacy › visualization interpretation
chart understanding
0.212022
OpenCQA: Open-ended Question Answering with Charts · EMNLP 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

multimodal baseline models · 1.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 OpenCQA: Open-ended Question Answering with Charts
abstract
Charts are very popular to analyze data and convey important insights. People often analyze visualizations to answer open-ended questions that require explanatory answers. Answering such questions are often difficult and time-consuming as it requires a lot of cognitive and perceptual efforts. To address this challenge, we introduce a new task called OpenCQA, where the goal is to answer an open-ended question about a chart with descriptive texts. We present the annotation process and an in-depth analysis of our dataset. We implement and evaluate a set of baselines under three practical settings. In the first setting, a chart and the accompanying article is provided as input to the model. The second setting provides only the relevant paragraph(s) to the chart instead of the entire article, whereas the third setting requires the model to generate an answer solely based on the chart. Our analysis of the results show that the top performing models generally produce fluent and coherent text while they struggle to perform complex logical and arithmetic reasoning.
Shankar Kantharaj, Do Xuan Long, Rixie Tiffany Ko Leong, Jia Qing Tan, Enamul Hoque Prince, Shafiq R. Joty
EMNLP4