Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jia Qing Tan
dblp:317/1012
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Vision and language · 100% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Visualization and visual analytics · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › Vision and language › visual question answering
chart question answering |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | OpenCQA: Open-ended Question Answering with Charts · EMNLP 2022 |
Computer vision › Vision and language
visual question answering |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | OpenCQA: Open-ended Question Answering with Charts · EMNLP 2022 |
Visualization and visual analytics › visualization literacy › visualization interpretation
chart understanding |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | OpenCQA: Open-ended Question Answering with Charts · EMNLP 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
multimodal baseline models · 1.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | OpenCQA: Open-ended Question Answering with ChartsabstractCharts are very popular to analyze data and convey important insights. People often analyze visualizations to answer open-ended questions that require explanatory answers. Answering such questions are often difficult and time-consuming as it requires a lot of cognitive and perceptual efforts. To address this challenge, we introduce a new task called OpenCQA, where the goal is to answer an open-ended question about a chart with descriptive texts. We present the annotation process and an in-depth analysis of our dataset. We implement and evaluate a set of baselines under three practical settings. In the first setting, a chart and the accompanying article is provided as input to the model. The second setting provides only the relevant paragraph(s) to the chart instead of the entire article, whereas the third setting requires the model to generate an answer solely based on the chart. Our analysis of the results show that the top performing models generally produce fluent and coherent text while they struggle to perform complex logical and arithmetic reasoning. Shankar Kantharaj, Do Xuan Long, Rixie Tiffany Ko Leong, Jia Qing Tan, Enamul Hoque Prince, Shafiq R. Joty |
EMNLP | 4 |