Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Taspon Gonggiatgul

dblp:317/1682 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2023
0009-0007-8111-071XORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Parallel and multicore computing · 100%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Mathematical optimization · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Parallel and multicore computing › parallel algorithms
branch-and-bound
0.612022
A parallel branch-and-bound algorithm with history-based domination · PPoPP 2022
Parallel and multicore computing › parallel algorithms › parallel search
parallel branch-and-bound
0.612022
A parallel branch-and-bound algorithm with history-based domination · PPoPP 2022
Mathematical optimization
combinatorial optimization
0.612022
A parallel branch-and-bound algorithm with history-based domination · PPoPP 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

thread restart · 1.1pool-based parallel search · 1.1history-based domination · 1.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 A parallel branch-and-bound algorithm with history-based domination and its application to the sequential ordering problem
abstract
In this paper, we describe the first parallel Branch-and-Bound (B&B) algorithm with a history-based domination technique. Although history-based domination substantially speeds up a B&B search, it makes parallelization much more challenging. Our algorithm is the first parallel exact algorithm for the Sequential Ordering Problem using a pure B&B approach. To effectively explore the solution space, we have developed three novel parallelization techniques: thread restart, parallel history domination, and history-table memory management. The proposed algorithm was experimentally evaluated using the SOPLIB and TSPLIB benchmarks on multi-core processors. Using 32 threads with a time limit of one hour, the algorithm gives geometric-mean speedups of 72x and 20x on the medium-difficulty SOPLIB and TSPLIB instances, respectively. On the hard instances, it solves 12 instances that the sequential algorithm does not solve, with geometric-mean speedups of 16x on SOPLIB and 32x on TSPLIB. Super-linear speedups up to 366x are seen on 16 instances.
Taspon Gonggiatgul, Ghassan Shobaki, Pinar Muyan-Özçelik
J. Parallel Distributed Comput.1
2022 A parallel branch-and-bound algorithm with history-based domination
abstract
In this paper, we describe a parallel Branch-and-Bound (B&B) algorithm with a history-based domination technique, and we apply it to the Sequential Ordering Problem (SOP). To the best of our knowledge, the proposed algorithm is the first parallel B&B algorithm that includes a history-based domination technique and is the first parallel B&B algorithm for solving the SOP using a pure B&B approach. The proposed algorithm takes a pool-based approach and employs a collection of novel techniques that we have developed to achieve effective parallel exploration of the solution space, including parallel history domination, history table memory management, and a thread restart technique. The proposed algorithm was experimentally evaluated using the SOPLIB and TSPLIB benchmarks. The results show that using ten threads with a time limit of one hour on the medium-difficulty instances, the proposed algorithm gives a geometric-mean speedup of 19.9 on SOPLIB and 10.23 on TSPLIB, with super-linear speedups up to 65x seen on 17 instances.
Taspon Gonggiatgul, Ghassan Shobaki, Pinar Muyan-Özçelik
PPoPP1