Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Asaf Karnieli

dblp:317/4659 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0003-3562-7463ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Efficient and distributed learning · 79% 3D vision · 21%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers
Parallel and multicore computing · 84% Distributed systems · 16%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › distributed training › large model training
distributed training of large language models
0.912025
Tensor-Parallelism with Partially Synchronized Activations · NeurIPS 2025
Parallel and multicore computing › distributed deep learning training
tensor parallelism
0.912025
Tensor-Parallelism with Partially Synchronized Activations · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
distributed training
0.712023
DropCompute: simple and more robust distributed synchronous training via compute variance reduction · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › distributed training
straggler mitigation
0.712023
DropCompute: simple and more robust distributed synchronous training via compute variance reduction · NeurIPS 2023
Computer vision › 3D vision › 3d shape reconstruction › shape from x
shape from shadow
0.612022
DeepShadow: Neural Shape from Shadow · ECCV (2) 2022
Distributed systems › distributed algorithms
distributed synchronization
0.212023
DropCompute: simple and more robust distributed synchronous training via compute variance reduction · NeurIPS 2023
Parallel and multicore computing
parallel programming models and runtimes
0.212023
DropCompute: simple and more robust distributed synchronous training via compute variance reduction · NeurIPS 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

tensor parallelism · 1.7partial activation synchronization · 1.7variance reduction · 1.3allreduce · 1.3neural rendering · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Tensor-Parallelism with Partially Synchronized Activations
abstract
Training and inference of Large Language Models (LLMs) with tensor-parallelism requires substantial communication to synchronize activations. Our findings suggest that with a few minor adjustments to current practices, LLMs can be trained without fully synchronizing activations, reducing bandwidth demands. We name this “Communication-Aware Architecture for Tensor-parallelism” (CAAT-Net). We train a 7B parameter CAAT-Net model and show that tensor-parallel communication can be reduced by up to 50% with no significant drop in pretraining accuracy across nearly all evaluated benchmarks. We also experiment with smaller 130M and 1.1B models to show the robustness and scalability of our method. We find that, in some scenarios, validation loss can even improve when reducing communication. Finally, we demonstrate how CAAT-Net accelerates both training and inference workloads across various settings and model sizes.
Itay Lamprecht, Asaf Karnieli, Yair Hanani, Niv Giladi, Daniel Soudry
NeurIPS2
2023 DropCompute: simple and more robust distributed synchronous training via compute variance reduction
abstract
Background: Distributed training is essential for large scale training of deep neural networks (DNNs). The dominant methods for large scale DNN training are synchronous (e.g. All-Reduce), but these require waiting for all workers in each step. Thus, these methods are limited by the delays caused by straggling workers. Results: We study a typical scenario in which workers are straggling due to variability in compute time. We find an analytical relation between compute time properties and scalability limitations, caused by such straggling workers. With these findings, we propose a simple yet effective decentralized method to reduce the variation among workers and thus improve the robustness of synchronous training. This method can be integrated with the widely used All-Reduce. Our findings are validated on large-scale training tasks using 200 Gaudi Accelerators.
Niv Giladi, Shahar Gottlieb, Moran Shkolnik, Asaf Karnieli, Ron Banner, Elad Hoffer, Kfir Y. Levy, Daniel Soudry
NeurIPS4
2022 DeepShadow: Neural Shape from Shadow
Asaf Karnieli, Ohad Fried, Yacov Hel-Or
ECCV (2)1