Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jonathan D. Stosz

dblp:317/4719 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1997
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
1 paper
Biometric security · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Biometric security › fingerprint recognition
fingerprint matching
0.011997
Fingerprint features-statistical analysis and system performance estimates · Proc. IEEE 1997
Biometric security
fingerprint recognition
0.011997
Fingerprint features-statistical analysis and system performance estimates · Proc. IEEE 1997
Biometric security › biometric performance evaluation
error rate estimation
0.011997
Fingerprint features-statistical analysis and system performance estimates · Proc. IEEE 1997

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

statistical analysis · 0.0performance modeling · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1997 Fingerprint features-statistical analysis and system performance estimates
abstract
As the need for personal authentication increases, many people are turning to biometric authentication as an alternative to traditional security devices. Concurrently, users and vendors of biometric authentication systems are searching for methods to establish system performance. This paper presents a model that defines the parameters necessary to estimate the performance of fingerprint-authentication systems without going through the rigors of intensive system testing inherent in establishing error rates. The model presented here was developed to predict the performance of the pore-based automated fingerprint-matching routine developed internally in the research and development division at the National Security Agency. This paper also discusses the statistics of fingerprint pores and the efficacy of using pores in addition to the traditionally used minutiae to improve system performance. In addition this paper links together the realms of automated matching and statistical evaluations of fingerprint features. The results of this link provides knowledge of practical performance limits of any automated matching routine that utilizes pores or minutia features.
Andrea R. Roddy, Jonathan D. Stosz
Proc. IEEE2