Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Dylan M. Asmar
dblp:317/4731
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
3as first author
6since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0001-6849-0999ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 3 first-author · 5 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 2 · 2 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Reinforcement learning · 54% Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 22% Motion planning and robot control · 15% |
Topics — the 8 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › multi-agent reinforcement learning › markov games
decentralized partially observable markov decision process |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Efficient Multiagent Planning via Shared Action Suggestions · AAAI 2026 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › multi-agent reinforcement learning
multi-agent communication |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Efficient Multiagent Planning via Shared Action Suggestions · AAAI 2026 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction
multi-agent planning |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Efficient Multiagent Planning via Shared Action Suggestions · AAAI 2026 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control
model predictive control |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Model Predictive Optimized Path Integral Strategies · ICRA 2023 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Multi-agent systems › multi-agent decision making
cooperative decision making |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Collaborative Decision Making Using Action Suggestions · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
multi-agent reinforcement learning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Collaborative Decision Making Using Action Suggestions · NeurIPS 2022 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › planning under uncertainty
partially observable markov decision process |
0.3 | 1 | 2026 | Efficient Multiagent Planning via Shared Action Suggestions · AAAI 2026 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
trajectory optimization |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Model Predictive Optimized Path Integral Strategies · ICRA 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
joint belief estimation · 1.0belief pruning · 1.0model predictive path integral · 0.7importance sampling · 0.7adaptive importance sampling · 0.7simulated experiments · 0.6policy estimation · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Efficient Multiagent Planning via Shared Action SuggestionsabstractDecentralized partially observable Markov decision processes with communication (Dec-POMDP-Com) provide a framework for multiagent decision making under uncertainty, but the NEXP-complete complexity for finite-horizon problems renders solutions intractable in general. While sharing actions and observations can reduce the complexity to PSPACE-complete, we propose an approach that bridges POMDPs and Dec-POMDPs by communicating only suggested joint actions, eliminating the need to share observations while retaining near-centralized performance. Our algorithm estimates joint beliefs using shared actions to prune infeasible beliefs. Each agent maintains possible belief sets for other agents, pruning them based on suggested actions to form an estimated joint belief usable with any centralized policy. This approach requires solving a POMDP for each agent, reducing computational complexity while preserving performance. We demonstrate its effectiveness on several Dec-POMDP benchmarks, showing performance comparable to centralized methods when shared actions enable effective belief pruning. This action-based communication framework offers a natural avenue for integrating human-agent cooperation, opening new directions for scalable multiagent planning under uncertainty, with applications in both autonomous systems and human-agent teams. Dylan M. Asmar, Mykel J. Kochenderfer |
AAAI | 1 |
| 2025 | LeRAAT: LLM-Enabled Real-Time Aviation Advisory ToolabstractIn aviation emergencies, high-stakes decisions must be made in an instant. Pilots rely on quick access to precise, context-specific information—an area where emerging tools like large language models (LLMs) show promise in providing critical support. To help research the effects of bringing AI into an aircraft cockpit, this paper introduces LeRAAT, a framework that integrates LLMs with the X-Plane flight simulator to deliver real-time, context-aware pilot assistance. The system uses live flight data, weather conditions, and aircraft documentation to generate recommendations aligned with aviation best practices and tailored to the particular situation. It employs a Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) pipeline that extracts and synthesizes information from aircraft type-specific manuals, including performance specifications and emergency procedures, as well as aviation regulatory materials, such as FAA directives and standard operating procedures. We showcase the framework in both a virtual reality and traditional on-screen simulation. LeRAAT can support a wide range of future research applications such as pilot training, human factors, and operational decision support. Marc R. Schlichting, Vale Rasmussen, Heba Alazzeh, Houjun Liu, Kiana Jafari Meimandi, Amelia F. Hardy, Dylan M. Asmar, Mykel J. Kochenderfer |
ECAI | 7 |
| 2025 | More than Marketing? On the Information Value of AI Benchmarks for Practitioners
Amelia F. Hardy, Anka Reuel, Kiana Jafari Meimandi, Lisa Soder, Allie Griffith, Dylan M. Asmar, Oluwasanmi Koyejo, Michael S. Bernstein, Mykel J. Kochenderfer |
IUI | 6 |
| 2024 | Optimal Control of Mechanical Ventilators with Learned Respiratory DynamicsabstractDeciding on appropriate mechanical ventilator management strategies significantly impacts the health outcomes for patients with respiratory diseases. Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) is one such disease that requires careful ventilator operation to be effectively treated. In this work, we frame the management of ventilators for patients with ARDS as a sequential decision making problem using the Markov decision process framework. We implement and compare controllers based on clinical guidelines contained in the ARDSnet protocol, optimal control theory, and learned latent dynamics represented as neural networks. The Pulse Physiology Engine’s respiratory dynamics simulator is used to establish a repeatable benchmark, gather simulated data, and quantitatively compare these controllers. We score performance in terms of measured improvement in established ARDS health markers (pertaining to improved respiratory rate, oxygenation, and vital signs). Our results demonstrate that techniques leveraging neural networks and optimal control can automatically discover effective ventilation management strategies without access to explicit ventilator management procedures or guidelines (such as those defined in the ARDSnet protocol). Isaac Ronald Ward, Dylan M. Asmar, Mansur M. Arief, Jana Krystofova Mike, Mykel J. Kochenderfer |
CBMS | 2 |
| 2023 | Model Predictive Optimized Path Integral StrategiesabstractWe generalize the derivation of model predictive path integral control (MPPI) to allow for a single joint distribution across controls in the control sequence. This reformation allows for the implementation of adaptive importance sampling (AIS) algorithms into the original importance sampling step while still maintaining the benefits of MPPI such as working with arbitrary system dynamics and cost functions. The benefit of optimizing the proposal distribution by integrating AIS at each control step is demonstrated in simulated environments including controlling multiple cars around a track. The new algorithm is more sample efficient than MPPI, achieving better performance with fewer samples. This performance disparity grows as the dimension of the action space increases. Results from simulations suggest the new algorithm can be used as an anytime algorithm, increasing the value of control at each iteration versus relying on a large set of samples. Repository—https://github.com/sisl/MPOPIS Dylan M. Asmar, Ransalu Senanayake, Shawn Manuel, Mykel J. Kochenderfer |
ICRA | 1 |
| 2022 | Collaborative Decision Making Using Action SuggestionsabstractThe level of autonomy is increasing in systems spanning multiple domains, but these systems still experience failures. One way to mitigate the risk of failures is to integrate human oversight of the autonomous systems and rely on the human to take control when the autonomy fails. In this work, we formulate a method of collaborative decision making through action suggestions that improves action selection without taking control of the system. Our approach uses each suggestion efficiently by incorporating the implicit information shared through suggestions to modify the agent's belief and achieves better performance with fewer suggestions than naively following the suggested actions. We assume collaborative agents share the same objective and communicate through valid actions. By assuming the suggested action is dependent only on the state, we can incorporate the suggested action as an independent observation of the environment. The assumption of a collaborative environment enables us to use the agent's policy to estimate the distribution over action suggestions. We propose two methods that use suggested actions and demonstrate the approach through simulated experiments. The proposed methodology results in increased performance while also being robust to suboptimal suggestions. Dylan M. Asmar, Mykel J. Kochenderfer |
NeurIPS | 1 |