Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Gregory J. Opiteck

dblp:317/4890 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1997
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Emerging computing paradigms · 61% Integrated circuit design · 39%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Emerging computing paradigms › nanoelectronics
molecular electronics
0.011997
Overview of nanoelectronic devices · Proc. IEEE 1997
Emerging computing paradigms › nanoelectronics
nanoelectronic devices
0.011997
Overview of nanoelectronic devices · Proc. IEEE 1997
Integrated circuit design › emerging device technologies
quantum-effect devices
0.011997
Overview of nanoelectronic devices · Proc. IEEE 1997
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1997 Overview of nanoelectronic devices
abstract
This paper provides an overview of research developments toward nanometer-scale electronic switching devices for use in building ultra-densely integrated electronic computers. Specifically, two classes of alternatives to the field-effect transistor are considered: (1) quantum-effect and single-electron solid-state devices and (2) molecular electronic devices. A taxonomy of devices in each class is provided, operational principles are described and compared for the various types of devices, and the literature about each is surveyed. This information is presented in nonmathematical terms intended for a general, technically interested readership.
David Goldhaber-Gordon, Michael S. Montemerlo, J. Christopher Love, Gregory J. Opiteck, James C. Ellenbogen
Proc. IEEE4