EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Martin E. Liggins
dblp:317/4950
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 1997
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Distributed systems · 88% Embedded and real-time systems · 12% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Distributed systems › distributed data processing
distributed data fusion |
0.0 | 1 | 1997 | Distributed Fusion Architectures and Algorithms for Target Tracking · Proc. IEEE 1997 |
Distributed systems › distributed algorithms
distributed estimation |
0.0 | 1 | 1997 | Distributed Fusion Architectures and Algorithms for Target Tracking · Proc. IEEE 1997 |
Distributed systems
distributed data association |
0.0 | 1 | 1997 | Distributed Fusion Architectures and Algorithms for Target Tracking · Proc. IEEE 1997 |
Embedded and real-time systems
sensor fusion |
0.0 | 1 | 1997 | Distributed Fusion Architectures and Algorithms for Target Tracking · Proc. IEEE 1997 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
multiple hypothesis tracking · 0.0joint probabilistic data association · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1997 | Distributed Fusion Architectures and Algorithms for Target TrackingabstractModern surveillance systems often utilize multiple physically distributed sensors of different types to provide complementary and overlapping coverage on targets. In order to generate target tracks and estimates, the sensor data need to be fused. While a centralized processing approach is theoretically optimal, there are significant advantages in distributing the fusion operations over multiple processing nodes. This paper discusses architectures for distributed fusion, whereby each node processes the data from its own set of sensors and communicates with other nodes to improve on the estimates, The information graph is introduced as a way of modeling information flow in distributed fusion systems and for developing algorithms. Fusion for target tracking involves two main operations: estimation and association. Distributed estimation algorithms based on the information graph are presented for arbitrary fusion architectures and related to linear and nonlinear distributed estimation results. The distributed data association problem is discussed in terms of track-to-track association likelihoods. Distributed versions of two popular tracking approaches (joint probabilistic data association and multiple hypothesis tracking) are then presented, and examples of applications are given. Martin E. Liggins, Chee-Yee Chong, Ivan Kadar, Mark G. Alford, Vincent Vannicola, Stelios C. A. Thomopoulos |
Proc. IEEE | 1 |