Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Gaia Grosso

dblp:317/6817 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Time series and sequential data · 44% Learning theory · 44% Representation and self-supervised learning · 13%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Time series and sequential data
anomaly detection
0.912025
AutoSciDACT: Automated Scientific Discovery through Contrastive Embedding and Hypothesis Testing · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Learning theory › hypothesis testing
two-sample testing
0.912025
AutoSciDACT: Automated Scientific Discovery through Contrastive Embedding and Hypothesis Testing · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › contrastive learning › contrastive feature learning
contrastive embedding
0.312025
AutoSciDACT: Automated Scientific Discovery through Contrastive Embedding and Hypothesis Testing · NeurIPS 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

two-sample test · 0.9new physics learning machine · 0.9contrastive pre-training · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 AutoSciDACT: Automated Scientific Discovery through Contrastive Embedding and Hypothesis Testing
abstract
Novelty detection in large scientific datasets faces two key challenges: the noisy and high-dimensional nature of experimental data, and the necessity of making *statistically robust* statements about any observed outliers. While there is a wealth of literature on anomaly detection via dimensionality reduction, most methods do not produce outputs compatible with quantifiable claims of scientific discovery. In this work we directly address these challenges, presenting the first step towards a unified pipeline for novelty detection adapted for the rigorous statistical demands of science. We introduce AutoSciDACT (Automated Scientific Discovery with Anomalous Contrastive Testing), a general-purpose pipeline for detecting novelty in scientific data. AutoSciDACT begins by creating expressive low-dimensional data representations using a contrastive pre-training, leveraging the abundance of high-quality simulated data in many scientific domains alongside expertise that can guide principled data augmentation strategies. These compact embeddings then enable an extremely sensitive machine learning-based two-sample test using the New Physics Learning Machine (NPLM) framework, which identifies and statistically quantifies deviations in observed data relative to a reference distribution (null hypothesis). We perform experiments across a range of astronomical, physical, biological, image, and synthetic datasets, demonstrating strong sensitivity to small injections of anomalous data across all domains.
Samuel Bright-Thonney, Christina Reissel, Gaia Grosso, Nathaniel Woodward, Katya Govorkova, Andrzej Novak, Sang Eon Park, Eric A. Moreno, Philip C. Harris
NeurIPS3