Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Gary Tom

dblp:317/7089 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 50% Computational science and engineering · 50%
Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 44% Optimization for machine learning · 44% Generative modeling · 13%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › model-based optimization
bayesian optimization
0.712023
GAUCHE: A Library for Gaussian Processes in Chemistry · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes
gaussian process
0.712023
GAUCHE: A Library for Gaussian Processes in Chemistry · NeurIPS 2023
Computational science and engineering
computational chemistry
0.712023
Tartarus: A Benchmarking Platform for Realistic And Practical Inverse Molecular Design · NeurIPS 2023
Computational science and engineering › materials informatics
inverse molecular design
0.712023
Tartarus: A Benchmarking Platform for Realistic And Practical Inverse Molecular Design · NeurIPS 2023
Bioinformatics and computational biology › molecular informatics
molecular design
0.712023
Tartarus: A Benchmarking Platform for Realistic And Practical Inverse Molecular Design · NeurIPS 2023
Bioinformatics and computational biology › drug discovery
molecular optimization
0.712023
Tartarus: A Benchmarking Platform for Realistic And Practical Inverse Molecular Design · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Generative modeling
molecular generation
0.212023
Tartarus: A Benchmarking Platform for Realistic And Practical Inverse Molecular Design · NeurIPS 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

reinforcement learning · 1.3physical simulation · 1.3generative model · 1.3gaussian process · 0.7bayesian optimization · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 GAUCHE: A Library for Gaussian Processes in Chemistry
abstract
We introduce GAUCHE, an open-source library for GAUssian processes in CHEmistry. Gaussian processes have long been a cornerstone of probabilistic machine learning, affording particular advantages for uncertainty quantification and Bayesian optimisation. Extending Gaussian processes to molecular representations, however, necessitates kernels defined over structured inputs such as graphs, strings and bit vectors. By providing such kernels in a modular, robust and easy-to-use framework, we seek to enable expert chemists and materials scientists to make use of state-of-the-art black-box optimization techniques. Motivated by scenarios frequently encountered in practice, we showcase applications for GAUCHE in molecular discovery, chemical reaction optimisation and protein design. The codebase is made available at https://github.com/leojklarner/gauche.
Ryan-Rhys Griffiths, Leo Klarner, Henry B. Moss, Aditya Ravuri, Sang Truong, Yuanqi Du, Samuel Stanton, Gary Tom, Bojana Rankovic, Arian Rokkum Jamasb, Aryan Deshwal, Julius Schwartz, Austin Tripp, Gregory Kell, Simon Frieder, Anthony Bourached, Alex Chan, Jacob Moss, Chengzhi Guo, Johannes Peter Dürholt, Saudamini Chaurasia, Ji Won Park, Felix Strieth-Kalthoff, Alpha A. Lee, Bingqing Cheng, Alán Aspuru-Guzik, Philippe Schwaller, Jian Tang 0005
NeurIPS8
2023 Tartarus: A Benchmarking Platform for Realistic And Practical Inverse Molecular Design
abstract
The efficient exploration of chemical space to design molecules with intended properties enables the accelerated discovery of drugs, materials, and catalysts, and is one of the most important outstanding challenges in chemistry. Encouraged by the recent surge in computer power and artificial intelligence development, many algorithms have been developed to tackle this problem. However, despite the emergence of many new approaches in recent years, comparatively little progress has been made in developing realistic benchmarks that reflect the complexity of molecular design for real-world applications. In this work, we develop a set of practical benchmark tasks relying on physical simulation of molecular systems mimicking real-life molecular design problems for materials, drugs, and chemical reactions. Additionally, we demonstrate the utility and ease of use of our new benchmark set by demonstrating how to compare the performance of several well-established families of algorithms. Overall, we believe that our benchmark suite will help move the field towards more realistic molecular design benchmarks, and move the development of inverse molecular design algorithms closer to the practice of designing molecules that solve existing problems in both academia and industry alike.
AkshatKumar Nigam, Robert Pollice, Gary Tom, Kjell Jorner, John Willes, Luca A. Thiede, Anshul Kundaje, Alán Aspuru-Guzik
NeurIPS3