Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Semanti Basu

dblp:317/7883 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
3as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · conflict

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 27% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 23% Robot manipulation · 13%
Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
2 papers
Human-AI interaction · 54% Human-robot interaction · 46%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
assembly planning
0.912025
Robot Planning Under Uncertainty for Object Assembly and Troubleshooting Using Human Causal Models · ICRA 2025
Robotics › Robot manipulation › assembly
object assembly
0.912025
Robot Planning Under Uncertainty for Object Assembly and Troubleshooting Using Human Causal Models · ICRA 2025
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › planning under uncertainty
partially observable markov decision process
0.912025
Robot Planning Under Uncertainty for Object Assembly and Troubleshooting Using Human Causal Models · ICRA 2025
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction
planning under uncertainty
0.912025
Robot Planning Under Uncertainty for Object Assembly and Troubleshooting Using Human Causal Models · ICRA 2025
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › causal reasoning
causal learning
0.812024
Invited: Using Causal Information to Enable More Efficient Robot Operation · DAC 2024
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
causal reasoning
0.812024
Invited: Using Causal Information to Enable More Efficient Robot Operation · DAC 2024
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation › knowledge transfer
causal transfer
0.812024
Invited: Using Causal Information to Enable More Efficient Robot Operation · DAC 2024
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › generalization in reinforcement learning
task generalization
0.812024
Invited: Using Causal Information to Enable More Efficient Robot Operation · DAC 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

crowdsourcing · 1.7approximate priors · 1.7POMDP planning · 1.7user study · 1.5one-to-one transfer · 1.5many-to-one transfer · 1.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Robot Planning Under Uncertainty for Object Assembly and Troubleshooting Using Human Causal Models
abstract
In this paper we explore if human mental models of objects, even when flawed, can be integrated with a collaborative robot's decision making framework to allow it to make smarter choices under partial observability for different object-related tasks such as assembly and troubleshooting. We demonstrate how (1) these informative causal models can be extracted from humans through crowdsourcing, (2) object assembly and troubleshooting can be formulated as Partially Observable Markov Decision Processes (POMDPs) and (3) our extracted causal models can be incorporated into those models in the form of approximate priors. Finally, (4) we use systematic experimentation in simulation to demonstrate the success of this approach, with 2 X average improvement in reward observed for object assembly tasks, and 1.4 X average improvement in reward observed for troubleshooting tasks.
Semanti Basu, Semir Tatlidil, Tiffany Tran, Serena Saxena, Tom Williams 0001, Steven A. Sloman, R. Iris Bahar
ICRA1
2024 Invited: Using Causal Information to Enable More Efficient Robot Operation
abstract
Causal reasoning is a key factor that allows human beings to effortlessly draw parallels between two seemingly different tasks. Given access to a limited number of human-generated causal models, if robots could be taught to perform a similar "transfer", then they could potentially generalize to different domains using limited human intervention. The goal is to effectively generate human-like causal models for an unknown task by learning from a small dataset of human-generated causal models on other related tasks. In this paper we propose two different methods to leverage causal models obtained from humans to generalize to a new task. We ran a user study to obtain causal models on how different light-producing objects function. We then explore one-to-one transfer, where we directly use a causal model generated by a participant to infer the causal model of another object. We also explore many-to-one transfer, where we leverage causal models from different objects and users to infer the causal model of an unknown object. Automated transfer of causal models from humans to unrelated domains has the potential to replicate human-like reasoning in an unknown scenario in the absence of an expert. That chain of reasoning represented through causal models can then be used by autonomous agents to guide several downstream tasks such as object assembly, trouble shooting, and repair.
Semanti Basu, Semir Tatlidil, Steven A. Sloman, R. Iris Bahar
DAC1
2022 Anthropometric salient points and convolutional neural network (CNN) for 3D human body classification
Semanti Basu, Fernand S. Cohen
Multim. Tools Appl.1