OBJECTIVE: Home healthcare (HHC) clinical notes contain critical infection indicators that clinicians need in structured "indicator + context" pairs. Data sparsity and limited computing resources hinder automated extraction in decentralized HHC settings. This study developed and evaluated a resource-efficient pipeline using instruction-tuned, moderate-sized large language models (LLMs) to address these barriers. To address the data sparsity challenge, we also assessed the impact of a targeted LLM-based data augmentation strategy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An expert-defined schema of 26 infection indicator categories was developed. We expanded the training set using a 3-stage workflow: targeted annotation, context mutation, and synthetic generation. We adapted 2 moderate-sized models (Gemma-12B and Qwen-14B) via Quantized Low-Rank Adaptation (QLoRA). We compared them to a larger-sized, prompted model and a smaller-sized, fully fine-tuned LLM. We evaluated all models on a held-out test set using partial micro-averaged F1 score, output reliability metrics, and qualitative error analysis. RESULTS: Instruction-tuned moderate-sized LLMs outperformed both baselines. The top-performing model, augmented Gemma-12B, achieved a partial micro-averaged F1 score of 0.879. LLM-based data augmentation enhanced overall performance, improving the identification of rare indicators and the interpretation of negations. The best model maintained a partial F1 score above 0.750 across all indicator categories. It also showed high format adherence, confirming its ability to generate reliable structured outputs. DISCUSSION: Instruction-tuning moderate-sized LLMs with QLoRA and targeted data augmentation enables high-accuracy extraction of infection indicators from HHC notes. CONCLUSION: This resource-efficient pipeline provides a scalable foundation for automated infection surveillance in healthcare settings with limited resources.

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to (1) review machine learning (ML)-based models for early infection diagnostic and prognosis prediction in post-acute care (PAC) settings, (2) identify key risk predictors influencing infection-related outcomes, and (3) examine the quality and limitations of these models. MATERIALS AND METHODS: PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, IEEE Xplore, CINAHL, and ACM digital library were searched in February 2024. Eligible studies leveraged PAC data to develop and evaluate ML models for infection-related risks. Data extraction followed the CHARMS checklist. Quality appraisal followed the PROBAST tool. Data synthesis was guided by the socio-ecological conceptual framework. RESULTS: Thirteen studies were included, mainly focusing on respiratory infections and nursing homes. Most used regression models with structured electronic health record data. Since 2020, there has been a shift toward advanced ML algorithms and multimodal data, biosensors, and clinical notes being significant sources of unstructured data. Despite these advances, there is insufficient evidence to support performance improvements over traditional models. Individual-level risk predictors, like impaired cognition, declined function, and tachycardia, were commonly used, while contextual-level predictors were barely utilized, consequently limiting model fairness. Major sources of bias included lack of external validation, inadequate model calibration, and insufficient consideration of data complexity. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Despite the growth of advanced modeling approaches in infection-related models in PAC settings, evidence supporting their superiority remains limited. Future research should leverage a socio-ecological lens for predictor selection and model construction, exploring optimal data modalities and ML model usage in PAC, while ensuring rigorous methodologies and fairness considerations.

OBJECTIVES: Little is known about proactive risk assessment concerning emergency department (ED) visits and hospitalizations in patients with heart failure (HF) who receive home healthcare (HHC) services. This study developed a time series risk model for predicting ED visits and hospitalizations in patients with HF using longitudinal electronic health record data. We also explored which data sources yield the best-performing models over various time windows. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We used data collected from 9362 patients from a large HHC agency. We iteratively developed risk models using both structured (eg, standard assessment tools, vital signs, visit characteristics) and unstructured data (eg, clinical notes). Seven specific sets of variables included: (1) the Outcome and Assessment Information Set, (2) vital signs, (3) visit characteristics, (4) rule-based natural language processing-derived variables, (5) term frequency-inverse document frequency variables, (6) Bio-Clinical Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers variables, and (7) topic modeling. Risk models were developed for 18 time windows (1-15, 30, 45, and 60 days) before an ED visit or hospitalization. Risk prediction performances were compared using recall, precision, accuracy, F1, and area under the receiver operating curve (AUC). RESULTS: The best-performing model was built using a combination of all 7 sets of variables and the time window of 4 days before an ED visit or hospitalization (AUC = 0.89 and F1 = 0.69). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: This prediction model suggests that HHC clinicians can identify patients with HF at risk for visiting the ED or hospitalization within 4 days before the event, allowing for earlier targeted interventions.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to explore the state of health information technology (HIT) usability evaluation in Africa. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We searched three electronic databases: PubMed, Embase, and Association for Computing Machinery. We categorized the stage of evaluations, the type of interactions assessed, and methods applied using Stead's System Development Life Cycle (SDLC) and Bennett and Shackel's usability models. RESULTS: Analysis of 73 of 1002 articles that met inclusion criteria reveals that HIT usability evaluations in Africa have increased in recent years and mainly focused on later SDLC stage (stages 4 and 5) evaluations in sub-Saharan Africa. Forty percent of the articles examined system-user-task-environment (type 4) interactions. Most articles used mixed methods to measure usability. Interviews and surveys were often used at each development stage, while other methods, such as quality-adjusted life year analysis, were only found at stage 5. Sixty percent of articles did not include a theoretical model or framework. DISCUSSION: The use of multistage evaluation and mixed methods approaches to obtain a comprehensive understanding HIT usability is critical to ensure that HIT meets user needs. CONCLUSIONS: Developing and enhancing usable HIT is critical to promoting equitable health service delivery and high-quality care in Africa. Early-stage evaluations (stages 1 and 2) and interactions (types 0 and 1) should receive special attention to ensure HIT usability prior to implementing HIT in the field.

OBJECTIVE: Understand the perceived role of electronic health records (EHR) and workflow fragmentation on clinician documentation burden in the emergency department (ED). METHODS: From February to June 2022, we conducted semistructured interviews among a national sample of US prescribing providers and registered nurses who actively practice in the adult ED setting and use Epic Systems' EHR. We recruited participants through professional listservs, social media, and email invitations sent to healthcare professionals. We analyzed interview transcripts using inductive thematic analysis and interviewed participants until we achieved thematic saturation. We finalized themes through a consensus-building process. RESULTS: We conducted interviews with 12 prescribing providers and 12 registered nurses. Six themes were identified related to EHR factors perceived to contribute to documentation burden including lack of advanced EHR capabilities, absence of EHR optimization for clinicians, poor user interface design, hindered communication, increased manual work, and added workflow blockages, and five themes associated with cognitive load. Two themes emerged in the relationship between workflow fragmentation and EHR documentation burden: underlying sources and adverse consequences. DISCUSSION: Obtaining further stakeholder input and consensus is essential to determine whether these perceived burdensome EHR factors could be extended to broader contexts and addressed through optimizing existing EHR systems alone or through a broad overhaul of the EHR's architecture and primary purpose. CONCLUSION: While most clinicians perceived that the EHR added value to patient care and care quality, our findings underscore the importance of designing EHRs that are in harmony with ED clinical workflows to alleviate the clinician documentation burden.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to identify temporal risk factor patterns documented in home health care (HHC) clinical notes and examine their association with hospitalizations or emergency department (ED) visits. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data for 73 350 episodes of care from one large HHC organization were analyzed using dynamic time warping and hierarchical clustering analysis to identify the temporal patterns of risk factors documented in clinical notes. The Omaha System nursing terminology represented risk factors. First, clinical characteristics were compared between clusters. Next, multivariate logistic regression was used to examine the association between clusters and risk for hospitalizations or ED visits. Omaha System domains corresponding to risk factors were analyzed and described in each cluster. RESULTS: Six temporal clusters emerged, showing different patterns in how risk factors were documented over time. Patients with a steep increase in documented risk factors over time had a 3 times higher likelihood of hospitalization or ED visit than patients with no documented risk factors. Most risk factors belonged to the physiological domain, and only a few were in the environmental domain. DISCUSSION: An analysis of risk factor trajectories reflects a patient's evolving health status during a HHC episode. Using standardized nursing terminology, this study provided new insights into the complex temporal dynamics of HHC, which may lead to improved patient outcomes through better treatment and management plans. CONCLUSION: Incorporating temporal patterns in documented risk factors and their clusters into early warning systems may activate interventions to prevent hospitalizations or ED visits in HHC.

OBJECTIVE: To identify the risk factors home healthcare (HHC) clinicians associate with patient deterioration and understand how clinicians respond to and document these risk factors. METHODS: We interviewed multidisciplinary HHC clinicians from January to March of 2021. Risk factors were mapped to standardized terminologies (eg, Omaha System). We used directed content analysis to identify risk factors for deterioration. We used inductive thematic analysis to understand HHC clinicians' response to risk factors and documentation of risk factors. RESULTS: Fifteen HHC clinicians identified a total of 79 risk factors that were mapped to standardized terminologies. HHC clinicians most frequently responded to risk factors by communicating with the prescribing provider (86.7% of clinicians) or following up with patients and caregivers (86.7%). HHC clinicians stated that a majority of risk factors can be found in clinical notes (ie, care coordination (53.3%) or visit (46.7%)). DISCUSSION: Clinicians acknowledged that social factors play a role in deterioration risk; but these factors are infrequently studied in HHC. While a majority of risk factors were represented in the Omaha System, additional terminologies are needed to comprehensively capture risk. Since most risk factors are documented in clinical notes, methods such as natural language processing are needed to extract them. CONCLUSION: This study engaged clinicians to understand risk for deterioration during HHC. The results of our study support the development of an early warning system by providing a comprehensive list of risk factors grounded in clinician expertize and mapped to standardized terminologies.