EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Ramya Muthukrishnan
dblp:318/6770
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 3 · 3 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Multi-agent systems · 61% Robot navigation and mapping · 39% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping
coverage control |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | LPAC: Learnable Perception-Action-Communication Loops With Applications to Coverage Control · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2025 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Multi-agent systems › multi-robot coordination
multi-robot coverage control |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | LPAC: Learnable Perception-Action-Communication Loops With Applications to Coverage Control · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2025 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Multi-agent systems
swarm robotics |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | LPAC: Learnable Perception-Action-Communication Loops With Applications to Coverage Control · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
imitation learning · 0.9graph neural network · 0.9convolutional neural network · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Spatial Regularisation for Improved Accuracy and Interpretability in Keypoint-Based Registration
Benjamin Billot, Ramya Muthukrishnan, Esra Abaci Turk, Patricia Ellen Grant, Nicholas Ayache, Hervé Delingette, Polina Golland |
MICCAI (14) | 2 |
| 2025 | LPAC: Learnable Perception-Action-Communication Loops With Applications to Coverage ControlabstractCoverage control is the problem of navigating a robot swarm to collaboratively monitor features or a phenomenon of interest not knowna priori. The problem is challenging in decentralized settings with robots that have limited communication and sensing capabilities. We propose a learnable Perception-Action-Communication (LPAC) architecture for the problem, wherein a convolutional neural network (CNN) processes localized perception; a graph neural network (GNN) facilitates robot communications; finally, a shallow multi-layer perceptron (MLP) computes robot actions. The GNN enables collaboration in the robot swarm by computingwhatinformation to communicate with nearby robots andhowto incorporate received information. Evaluations show that the LPAC models—trained using imitation learning—outperform standard decentralized and centralized coverage control algorithms. The learned policy generalizes to environments different from the training dataset, transfers to larger environments with more robots, and is robust to noisy position estimates. The results indicate the suitability of LPAC architectures for decentralized navigation in robot swarms to achieve collaborative behavior. Saurav Agarwal, Ramya Muthukrishnan, Walker Gosrich, Vijay Kumar 0001, Alejandro Ribeiro |
IEEE Trans. Robotics | 2 |
| 2022 | Extracting seizure frequency from epilepsy clinic notes: a machine reading approach to natural language processingabstractOBJECTIVE: Seizure frequency and seizure freedom are among the most important outcome measures for patients with epilepsy. In this study, we aimed to automatically extract this clinical information from unstructured text in clinical notes. If successful, this could improve clinical decision-making in epilepsy patients and allow for rapid, large-scale retrospective research. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We developed a finetuning pipeline for pretrained neural models to classify patients as being seizure-free and to extract text containing their seizure frequency and date of last seizure from clinical notes. We annotated 1000 notes for use as training and testing data and determined how well 3 pretrained neural models, BERT, RoBERTa, and Bio_ClinicalBERT, could identify and extract the desired information after finetuning. RESULTS: The finetuned models (BERTFT, Bio_ClinicalBERTFT, and RoBERTaFT) achieved near-human performance when classifying patients as seizure free, with BERTFT and Bio_ClinicalBERTFT achieving accuracy scores over 80%. All 3 models also achieved human performance when extracting seizure frequency and date of last seizure, with overall F1 scores over 0.80. The best combination of models was Bio_ClinicalBERTFT for classification, and RoBERTaFT for text extraction. Most of the gains in performance due to finetuning required roughly 70 annotated notes. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Our novel machine reading approach to extracting important clinical outcomes performed at or near human performance on several tasks. This approach opens new possibilities to support clinical practice and conduct large-scale retrospective clinical research. Future studies can use our finetuning pipeline with minimal training annotations to answer new clinical questions. Kevin Xie, Ryan S. Gallagher, Erin C. Conrad, Chadric O. Garrick, Steven Baldassano, John M. Bernabei, Peter D. Galer, Nina J. Ghosn, Adam S. Greenblatt, Tara Jennings, Alana Kornspun, Catherine V. Kulick-Soper, Jal M. Panchal, Akash R. Pattnaik, Brittany Scheid, Danmeng Wei, Micah Weitzman, Ramya Muthukrishnan, Joongwon Kim, Brian Litt, Colin A. Ellis, Dan Roth 0001 |
J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc. | 18 |