Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Hans de Ferrante

dblp:319/1158 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein-protein interaction prediction
protein interface prediction
0.612022
PIPENN: protein interface prediction from sequence with an ensemble of neural nets · Bioinform. 2022
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein-protein interaction prediction
sequence-based interface prediction
0.612022
PIPENN: protein interface prediction from sequence with an ensemble of neural nets · Bioinform. 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

ensemble learning · 0.6deep learning · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 PIPENN: protein interface prediction from sequence with an ensemble of neural nets
abstract
MOTIVATION: The interactions between proteins and other molecules are essential to many biological and cellular processes. Experimental identification of interface residues is a time-consuming, costly and challenging task, while protein sequence data are ubiquitous. Consequently, many computational and machine learning approaches have been developed over the years to predict such interface residues from sequence. However, the effectiveness of different Deep Learning (DL) architectures and learning strategies for protein-protein, protein-nucleotide and protein-small molecule interface prediction has not yet been investigated in great detail. Therefore, we here explore the prediction of protein interface residues using six DL architectures and various learning strategies with sequence-derived input features. RESULTS: We constructed a large dataset dubbed BioDL, comprising protein-protein interactions from the PDB, and DNA/RNA and small molecule interactions from the BioLip database. We also constructed six DL architectures, and evaluated them on the BioDL benchmarks. This shows that no single architecture performs best on all instances. An ensemble architecture, which combines all six architectures, does consistently achieve peak prediction accuracy. We confirmed these results on the published benchmark set by Zhang and Kurgan (ZK448), and on our own existing curated homo- and heteromeric protein interaction dataset. Our PIPENN sequence-based ensemble predictor outperforms current state-of-the-art sequence-based protein interface predictors on ZK448 on all interaction types, achieving an AUC-ROC of 0.718 for protein-protein, 0.823 for protein-nucleotide and 0.842 for protein-small molecule. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Source code and datasets are available at https://github.com/ibivu/pipenn/. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Bas Stringer, Hans de Ferrante, Sanne Abeln, Jaap Heringa, K. Anton Feenstra, Reza Haydarlou
Bioinform.2