Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Rebecca Irlmeier
dblp:319/1611
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
0000-0001-8210-9584ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology
genomic epidemiology |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Cox regression is robust to inaccurate EHR-extracted event time: an application to EHR-based GWAS · Bioinform. 2022 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › statistical genetics
genotype-phenotype association |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Cox regression is robust to inaccurate EHR-extracted event time: an application to EHR-based GWAS · Bioinform. 2022 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › survival analysis
cox regression |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Cox regression is robust to inaccurate EHR-extracted event time: an application to EHR-based GWAS · Bioinform. 2022 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
survival analysis |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Cox regression is robust to inaccurate EHR-extracted event time: an application to EHR-based GWAS · Bioinform. 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
simulation · 0.6logistic regression · 0.6cox regression · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | Cox regression is robust to inaccurate EHR-extracted event time: an application to EHR-based GWASabstractMOTIVATION: Logistic regression models are used in genomic studies to analyze the genetic data linked to electronic health records (EHRs), and do not take full usage of the time-to-event information available in EHRs. Previous work has shown that Cox regression, which can account for left truncation and right censoring in EHRs, increased the power to detect genotype-phenotype associations compared to logistic regression. We extend this to evaluate the relative performance of Cox regression and various logistic regression models in the presence of positive errors in event time (delayed event time), relating to recorded event time accuracy. RESULTS: One Cox model and three logistic regression models were considered under different scenarios of delayed event time. Extensive simulations and a genomic study application were used to evaluate the impact of delayed event time. While logistic regression does not model the time-to-event directly, various logistic regression models used in the literature were more sensitive to delayed event time than Cox regression. Results highlighted the importance to identify and exclude the patients diagnosed before entry time. Cox regression had similar or modest improvement in statistical power over various logistic regression models at controlled type I error. This was supported by the empirical data, where the Cox models steadily had the highest sensitivity to detect known genotype-phenotype associations under all scenarios of delayed event time. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Access to individual-level EHR and genotype data is restricted by the IRB. Simulation code and R script for data process are at: https://github.com/QingxiaCindyChen/CoxRobustEHR.git. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Rebecca Irlmeier, Jacob J. Hughey, Lisa Bastarache, Joshua C. Denny, Qingxia Chen |
Bioinform. | 1 |