Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Rebecca Irlmeier

dblp:319/1611 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
0000-0001-8210-9584ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology
genomic epidemiology
0.612022
Cox regression is robust to inaccurate EHR-extracted event time: an application to EHR-based GWAS · Bioinform. 2022
Bioinformatics and computational biology › statistical genetics
genotype-phenotype association
0.612022
Cox regression is robust to inaccurate EHR-extracted event time: an application to EHR-based GWAS · Bioinform. 2022
Bioinformatics and computational biology › survival analysis
cox regression
0.212022
Cox regression is robust to inaccurate EHR-extracted event time: an application to EHR-based GWAS · Bioinform. 2022
Bioinformatics and computational biology
survival analysis
0.212022
Cox regression is robust to inaccurate EHR-extracted event time: an application to EHR-based GWAS · Bioinform. 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

simulation · 0.6logistic regression · 0.6cox regression · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 Cox regression is robust to inaccurate EHR-extracted event time: an application to EHR-based GWAS
abstract
MOTIVATION: Logistic regression models are used in genomic studies to analyze the genetic data linked to electronic health records (EHRs), and do not take full usage of the time-to-event information available in EHRs. Previous work has shown that Cox regression, which can account for left truncation and right censoring in EHRs, increased the power to detect genotype-phenotype associations compared to logistic regression. We extend this to evaluate the relative performance of Cox regression and various logistic regression models in the presence of positive errors in event time (delayed event time), relating to recorded event time accuracy. RESULTS: One Cox model and three logistic regression models were considered under different scenarios of delayed event time. Extensive simulations and a genomic study application were used to evaluate the impact of delayed event time. While logistic regression does not model the time-to-event directly, various logistic regression models used in the literature were more sensitive to delayed event time than Cox regression. Results highlighted the importance to identify and exclude the patients diagnosed before entry time. Cox regression had similar or modest improvement in statistical power over various logistic regression models at controlled type I error. This was supported by the empirical data, where the Cox models steadily had the highest sensitivity to detect known genotype-phenotype associations under all scenarios of delayed event time. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Access to individual-level EHR and genotype data is restricted by the IRB. Simulation code and R script for data process are at: https://github.com/QingxiaCindyChen/CoxRobustEHR.git. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Rebecca Irlmeier, Jacob J. Hughey, Lisa Bastarache, Joshua C. Denny, Qingxia Chen
Bioinform.1