Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Marta Lemanczyk

dblp:319/1762 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 72% Medical and health informatics · 28%
Network and information security
1 paper
Privacy and data protection · 50% Cryptographic protocols and secure computation · 50%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene regulation › regulatory element discovery
enhancer prediction
0.812024
Metadata-guided feature disentanglement for functional genomics · Bioinform. 2024
Bioinformatics and computational biology
functional genomics
0.812024
Metadata-guided feature disentanglement for functional genomics · Bioinform. 2024
Medical and health informatics
clinical prediction
0.612022
Federated Random Forests can improve local performance of predictive models for various healthcare applications · Bioinform. 2022
Privacy and data protection
privacy-preserving data analysis
0.212022
Federated Random Forests can improve local performance of predictive models for various healthcare applications · Bioinform. 2022
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation
secure multiparty computation
0.212022
Federated Random Forests can improve local performance of predictive models for various healthcare applications · Bioinform. 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

random forest · 1.1federated learning · 1.1feature disentanglement · 0.8deep learning · 0.8adversarial learning · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Metadata-guided feature disentanglement for functional genomics
abstract
With the development of high-throughput technologies, genomics datasets rapidly grow in size, including functional genomics data. This has allowed the training of large Deep Learning (DL) models to predict epigenetic readouts, such as protein binding or histone modifications, from genome sequences. However, large dataset sizes come at a price of data consistency, often aggregating results from a large number of studies, conducted under varying experimental conditions. While data from large-scale consortia are useful as they allow studying the effects of different biological conditions, they can also contain unwanted biases from confounding experimental factors. Here, we introduce Metadata-guided Feature Disentanglement (MFD)-an approach that allows disentangling biologically relevant features from potential technical biases. MFD incorporates target metadata into model training, by conditioning weights of the model output layer on different experimental factors. It then separates the factors into disjoint groups and enforces independence of the corresponding feature subspaces with an adversarially learned penalty. We show that the metadata-driven disentanglement approach allows for better model introspection, by connecting latent features to experimental factors, without compromising, or even improving performance in downstream tasks, such as enhancer prediction, or genetic variant discovery. The code will be made available at https://github.com/HealthML/MFD.
Alexander Rakowski, Remo Monti, Viktoriia Huryn, Marta Lemanczyk, Uwe Ohler, Christoph Lippert
Bioinform.4
2022 Federated Random Forests can improve local performance of predictive models for various healthcare applications
abstract
MOTIVATION: Limited data access has hindered the field of precision medicine from exploring its full potential, e.g. concerning machine learning and privacy and data protection rules.Our study evaluates the efficacy of federated Random Forests (FRF) models, focusing particularly on the heterogeneity within and between datasets. We addressed three common challenges: (i) number of parties, (ii) sizes of datasets and (iii) imbalanced phenotypes, evaluated on five biomedical datasets. RESULTS: The FRF outperformed the average local models and performed comparably to the data-centralized models trained on the entire data. With an increasing number of models and decreasing dataset size, the performance of local models decreases drastically. The FRF, however, do not decrease significantly. When combining datasets of different sizes, the FRF vastly improve compared to the average local models. We demonstrate that the FRF remain more robust and outperform the local models by analyzing different class-imbalances.Our results support that FRF overcome boundaries of clinical research and enables collaborations across institutes without violating privacy or legal regulations. Clinicians benefit from a vast collection of unbiased data aggregated from different geographic locations, demographics and other varying factors. They can build more generalizable models to make better clinical decisions, which will have relevance, especially for patients in rural areas and rare or geographically uncommon diseases, enabling personalized treatment. In combination with secure multi-party computation, federated learning has the power to revolutionize clinical practice by increasing the accuracy and robustness of healthcare AI and thus paving the way for precision medicine. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The implementation of the federated random forests can be found at https://featurecloud.ai/. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Anne-Christin Hauschild, Marta Lemanczyk, Julian O. Matschinske, Tobias Frisch, Olga I. Zolotareva, Andreas Holzinger, Jan Baumbach, Dominik Heider
Bioinform.2