Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Marta Lemanczyk
dblp:319/1762
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 72% Medical and health informatics · 28% | |
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Privacy and data protection · 50% Cryptographic protocols and secure computation · 50% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene regulation › regulatory element discovery
enhancer prediction |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Metadata-guided feature disentanglement for functional genomics · Bioinform. 2024 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
functional genomics |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Metadata-guided feature disentanglement for functional genomics · Bioinform. 2024 |
Medical and health informatics
clinical prediction |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Federated Random Forests can improve local performance of predictive models for various healthcare applications · Bioinform. 2022 |
Privacy and data protection
privacy-preserving data analysis |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Federated Random Forests can improve local performance of predictive models for various healthcare applications · Bioinform. 2022 |
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation
secure multiparty computation |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Federated Random Forests can improve local performance of predictive models for various healthcare applications · Bioinform. 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
random forest · 1.1federated learning · 1.1feature disentanglement · 0.8deep learning · 0.8adversarial learning · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Metadata-guided feature disentanglement for functional genomicsabstractWith the development of high-throughput technologies, genomics datasets rapidly grow in size, including functional genomics data. This has allowed the training of large Deep Learning (DL) models to predict epigenetic readouts, such as protein binding or histone modifications, from genome sequences. However, large dataset sizes come at a price of data consistency, often aggregating results from a large number of studies, conducted under varying experimental conditions. While data from large-scale consortia are useful as they allow studying the effects of different biological conditions, they can also contain unwanted biases from confounding experimental factors. Here, we introduce Metadata-guided Feature Disentanglement (MFD)-an approach that allows disentangling biologically relevant features from potential technical biases. MFD incorporates target metadata into model training, by conditioning weights of the model output layer on different experimental factors. It then separates the factors into disjoint groups and enforces independence of the corresponding feature subspaces with an adversarially learned penalty. We show that the metadata-driven disentanglement approach allows for better model introspection, by connecting latent features to experimental factors, without compromising, or even improving performance in downstream tasks, such as enhancer prediction, or genetic variant discovery. The code will be made available at https://github.com/HealthML/MFD. Alexander Rakowski, Remo Monti, Viktoriia Huryn, Marta Lemanczyk, Uwe Ohler, Christoph Lippert |
Bioinform. | 4 |
| 2022 | Federated Random Forests can improve local performance of predictive models for various healthcare applicationsabstractMOTIVATION: Limited data access has hindered the field of precision medicine from exploring its full potential, e.g. concerning machine learning and privacy and data protection rules.Our study evaluates the efficacy of federated Random Forests (FRF) models, focusing particularly on the heterogeneity within and between datasets. We addressed three common challenges: (i) number of parties, (ii) sizes of datasets and (iii) imbalanced phenotypes, evaluated on five biomedical datasets. RESULTS: The FRF outperformed the average local models and performed comparably to the data-centralized models trained on the entire data. With an increasing number of models and decreasing dataset size, the performance of local models decreases drastically. The FRF, however, do not decrease significantly. When combining datasets of different sizes, the FRF vastly improve compared to the average local models. We demonstrate that the FRF remain more robust and outperform the local models by analyzing different class-imbalances.Our results support that FRF overcome boundaries of clinical research and enables collaborations across institutes without violating privacy or legal regulations. Clinicians benefit from a vast collection of unbiased data aggregated from different geographic locations, demographics and other varying factors. They can build more generalizable models to make better clinical decisions, which will have relevance, especially for patients in rural areas and rare or geographically uncommon diseases, enabling personalized treatment. In combination with secure multi-party computation, federated learning has the power to revolutionize clinical practice by increasing the accuracy and robustness of healthcare AI and thus paving the way for precision medicine. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The implementation of the federated random forests can be found at https://featurecloud.ai/. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Anne-Christin Hauschild, Marta Lemanczyk, Julian O. Matschinske, Tobias Frisch, Olga I. Zolotareva, Andreas Holzinger, Jan Baumbach, Dominik Heider |
Bioinform. | 2 |