Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Yankun Liu

dblp:319/2264 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
0009-0007-5882-444XORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Medical and health informatics · 100%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Image recognition and object detection · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
medical image analysis
0.612022
Predicting colorectal cancer tumor mutational burden from histopathological images and clinical information using multi-modal deep learning · Bioinform. 2022
Medical and health informatics › oncology
cancer diagnosis
0.612022
Predicting colorectal cancer tumor mutational burden from histopathological images and clinical information using multi-modal deep learning · Bioinform. 2022
Medical and health informatics
immunotherapy
0.212022
Predicting colorectal cancer tumor mutational burden from histopathological images and clinical information using multi-modal deep learning · Bioinform. 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

resnet · 1.1deep learning · 1.1multimodal compact bilinear pooling · 0.6multi-modal compact bilinear pooling · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 DeepPBI-KG: a deep learning method for the prediction of phage-bacteria interactions based on key genes
abstract
Phages, the natural predators of bacteria, were discovered more than 100 years ago. However, increasing antimicrobial resistance rates have revitalized phage research. Methods that are more time-consuming and efficient than wet-laboratory experiments are needed to help screen phages quickly for therapeutic use. Traditional computational methods usually ignore the fact that phage-bacteria interactions are achieved by key genes and proteins. Methods for intraspecific prediction are rare since almost all existing methods consider only interactions at the species and genus levels. Moreover, most strains in existing databases contain only partial genome information because whole-genome information for species is difficult to obtain. Here, we propose a new approach for interaction prediction by constructing new features from key genes and proteins via the application of K-means sampling to select high-quality negative samples for prediction. Finally, we develop DeepPBI-KG, a corresponding prediction tool based on feature selection and a deep neural network. The results show that the average area under the curve for prediction reached 0.93 for each strain, and the overall AUC and area under the precision-recall curve reached 0.89 and 0.92, respectively, on the independent test set; these values are greater than those of other existing prediction tools. The forward and reverse validation results indicate that key genes and key proteins regulate and influence the interaction, which supports the reliability of the model. In addition, intraspecific prediction experiments based on Klebsiella pneumoniae data demonstrate the potential applicability of DeepPBI-KG for intraspecific prediction. In summary, the feature engineering and interaction prediction approaches proposed in this study can effectively improve the robustness and stability of interaction prediction, can achieve high generalizability, and may provide new directions and insights for rapid phage screening for therapy.
Tongqing Wei, Chenqi Lu, Hanxiao Du, Qianru Yang, Yankun Liu, Yuanhao Tang, Wen-Hong Zhang
Briefings Bioinform.6
2022 Predicting colorectal cancer tumor mutational burden from histopathological images and clinical information using multi-modal deep learning
abstract
MOTIVATION: Tumor mutational burden (TMB) is an indicator of the efficacy and prognosis of immune checkpoint therapy in colorectal cancer (CRC). In general, patients with higher TMB values are more likely to benefit from immunotherapy. Though whole-exome sequencing is considered the gold standard for determining TMB, it is difficult to be applied in clinical practice due to its high cost. There are also a few DNA panel-based methods to estimate TMB; however, their detection cost is also high, and the associated wet-lab experiments usually take days, which emphasize the need for faster and cheaper alternatives. RESULTS: In this study, we propose a multi-modal deep learning model based on a residual network (ResNet) and multi-modal compact bilinear pooling to predict TMB status (i.e. TMB high (TMB_H) or TMB low(TMB_L)) directly from histopathological images and clinical data. We applied the model to CRC data from The Cancer Genome Atlas and compared it with four other popular methods, namely, ResNet18, ResNet50, VGG19 and AlexNet. We tested different TMB thresholds, namely, percentiles of 10%, 14.3%, 15%, 16.3%, 20%, 30% and 50%, to differentiate TMB_H and TMB_L.For the percentile of 14.3% (i.e. TMB value 20) and ResNet18, our model achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.817 after 5-fold cross-validation, which was better than that of other compared models. In addition, we also found that TMB values were significantly associated with the tumor stage and N and M stages. Our study shows that deep learning models can predict TMB status from histopathological images and clinical information only, which is worth clinical application.
Kaimei Huang, Binghu Lin, Yankun Liu, Jingwu Li, Geng Tian, Jialiang Yang
Bioinform.4