Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Carlos Castelar Wembers

dblp:319/2436 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Motion planning and robot control · 67% Autonomous driving · 33%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control › learning control
control policy learning
0.612022
Deep Drifting: Autonomous Drifting of Arbitrary Trajectories using Deep Reinforcement Learning · ICRA 2022
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
robot control
0.612022
Deep Drifting: Autonomous Drifting of Arbitrary Trajectories using Deep Reinforcement Learning · ICRA 2022
Robotics › Autonomous driving
vehicle control
0.612022
Deep Drifting: Autonomous Drifting of Arbitrary Trajectories using Deep Reinforcement Learning · ICRA 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

vehicle simulation · 0.6deep reinforcement learning · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 Deep Drifting: Autonomous Drifting of Arbitrary Trajectories using Deep Reinforcement Learning
abstract
In this paper, a Deep Neural Network is trained using Reinforcement Learning in order to drift on arbitrary trajectories which are defined by a sequence of waypoints. In a first step, a highly accurate vehicle simulation is used for the training process. Then, the obtained policy is refined and validated on a self-built model car. The chosen reward function is inspired by the scoring process of real life drifting competitions. It is kept simple and thus applicable to very general scenarios. The experimental results demonstrate that a relatively small network, given only a few measurements and control inputs, already achieves an outstanding performance. In simulation, the learned controller is able to reliably hold a steady state drift. Moreover, it is capable of generalizing to arbitrary, previously unknown trajectories and different driving conditions. After transferring the learned controller to the model car, it also performs surprisingly well given the physical constraints.
Fabian Domberg, Carlos Castelar Wembers, Hiren Patel, Georg Schildbach
ICRA2