Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jan Baumgärtner

dblp:319/2648 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-7825-3476ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 first-author · 3 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 3 · 2 first-author · 3 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Motion planning and robot control · 66% Robot manipulation · 34%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › design optimization
robot design optimization
0.912025
Learning Optimal Design Manifolds to Design More Practical Robotic Systems · ICRA 2025
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › assembly planning
disassembly planning
0.812024
Generalized Partially Destructive Disassembly Planning for Robotic Disassembly · ICRA 2024
Robotics › Robot manipulation › disassembly
robotic disassembly
0.812024
Generalized Partially Destructive Disassembly Planning for Robotic Disassembly · ICRA 2024
Robotics › Robot manipulation
assembly
0.212024
Generalized Partially Destructive Disassembly Planning for Robotic Disassembly · ICRA 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

manifold learning · 0.9symbolic planning · 0.8geometric reasoning · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Learning Optimal Design Manifolds to Design More Practical Robotic Systems
abstract
This paper introduces the optimal design manifold as a novel approach for understanding and optimizing the design of robotic systems. Existing optimization frameworks often jointly optimize design and behavior but lack insight into why specific designs are optimal for given tasks. Additionally, a functionally optimal design may not always be the most practical to build and practicality cannot always be captured by an objective function. By defining and learning the optimal design manifold, which represents the space of all optimal solutions, we provide a systematic method for exploring the design space and selecting the most practical optimal design. We apply the optimal design manifold to robot cell layout optimization, robot design optimization, and multi-camera placement and demonstrate its effectiveness in enhancing design choices by enabling a deeper understanding of what makes a design optimal.
Jan Baumgärtner, Alexander Puchta, Jürgen Fleischer
ICRA1
2024 Generalized Partially Destructive Disassembly Planning for Robotic Disassembly
abstract
While robotic assembly is a well researched topic, recycling and disassembly of products are also becoming ever more important as we transition to a more sustainable economy. In disassembly, we are typically only interested in a subset of product parts, which opens the possibility of using destructive processes such as tearing, cutting, or milling to speed up the disassembly. Currently, such destructive actions are only included as predefined case-specific actions such as milling away a screw head. By contrast, this paper presents a generalized approach to destructive disassembly planning that can automatically derive destructive disassembly actions from a symbolic representation of the disassembly state. Viable destructive actions are identified and verified only based on the underlying geometric model, circumventing the need for their explicit definition. We showcase the performance of this system both virtually on several test parts and physically by destructively and non-destructively disassembling a model of an electric motor using a robot manipulator with a multitool end effector.
Malte Hansjosten, Jan Baumgärtner, Jürgen Fleischer
ICRA2
2024 One Problem, One Solution: Unifying Robot Design and Cell Layout Optimization
abstract
The task-specific optimization of robotic systems has since the inception of the field been divided into the optimization of the robot and the optimization of the layout of its workstations. In this letter, we argue that these two problems are interdependent and should be treated as such. To this end, we present a unified problem formulation that enables for the simultaneous optimization of both the robot kinematics and the workstation layout. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach by jointly optimizing a robotic milling system. To compare our approach to the state of the art, we optimize the robot’s kinematics and layout separately. The results show that our approach outperforms the state of the art and that simultaneous optimization leads to up to eight times better solutions.
Jan Baumgärtner, Alexander Puchta, Jürgen Fleischer
IROS1