Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Shane McCully

dblp:319/3699 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Usability and user experience research · 33% User interface design and tools · 33% Design research and methods · 33%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Design research and methods › ideation method
design cards
0.612022
The TAC Toolkit: Supporting Design for User Acceptance of Health Technologies from a Macro-Temporal Perspective · CHI 2022
User interface design and tools › design tools
design toolkit
0.612022
The TAC Toolkit: Supporting Design for User Acceptance of Health Technologies from a Macro-Temporal Perspective · CHI 2022
Usability and user experience research
technology acceptance
0.612022
The TAC Toolkit: Supporting Design for User Acceptance of Health Technologies from a Macro-Temporal Perspective · CHI 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

workshop evaluation · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 The TAC Toolkit: Supporting Design for User Acceptance of Health Technologies from a Macro-Temporal Perspective
abstract
User acceptance is key for the successful uptake and use of health technologies, but also impacted by numerous factors not always easily accessible nor operationalised by designers in practice. This work seeks to facilitate the application of acceptance theory in design practice through the Technology Acceptance (TAC) toolkit: a novel theory-based design tool and method comprising 16 cards, 3 personas, 3 scenarios, a virtual think-space, and a website, which we evaluated through workshops conducted with 21 designers of health technologies. Findings showed that the toolkit revised and extended designers’ knowledge of technology acceptance, fostered their appreciation, empathy and ethical values while designing for acceptance, and contributed towards shaping their future design practice. We discuss implications for considering user acceptance a dynamic, multi-stage process in design practice, and better supporting designers in imagining distant acceptance challenges. Finally, we examine the generative value of the TAC toolkit and its possible future evolution.
Camille Nadal, Shane McCully, Kevin Doherty, Corina Sas, Gavin Doherty
CHI2