Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Sheza Naveed

dblp:319/3713 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
4since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0004-7176-1277ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 3 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021Security and privacy · 2 · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
2 papers
Collaborative and social computing · 68% Accessibility and assistive technology · 32%
Network and information security
1 paper
Privacy and data protection · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Collaborative and social computing › online communities
online community participation
1.012026
"If we post, what will people think of us?": Offline Norms, Online Engagement and Unpacking Gendered Experiences in a Pakistani Facebook Tech Community · CHI 2026
Privacy and data protection
privacy management
0.612022
"Ask this from the person who has private stuff": Privacy Perceptions, Behaviours and Beliefs Beyond W.E.I.R.D · CHI 2022
Accessibility and assistive technology › cognitive accessibility
low-literate users
0.212022
"Ask this from the person who has private stuff": Privacy Perceptions, Behaviours and Beliefs Beyond W.E.I.R.D · CHI 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

semi-structured interviews · 2.1qualitative study · 2.1participant observation · 1.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 "If we post, what will people think of us?": Offline Norms, Online Engagement and Unpacking Gendered Experiences in a Pakistani Facebook Tech Community
abstract
This paper investigates how deeply entrenched offline gender norms and patriarchal power structures constrain and shape participation within Tech Aids, a large Facebook community in Pakistan focused on peer-to-peer technical help and e-commerce transactions. Through a qualitative study involving 14 months of participant observation and 20 semi-structured interviews (11 male, 9 female), we document significant gendered disparities: women exhibit lower public engagement, driven primarily by heightened privacy concerns, fear of harassment, and perceived male gatekeeping. Our analysis reveals that traditional socio-cultural restrictions on women’s mobility and constrained interactions with unfamiliar men in physical tech marketplaces are directly mirrored in the online Tech Aids environment. To manage these risks, women actively engage in practices of digital purdah, using workarounds like proxy-posting through male relatives to maintain both technical access and cultural modesty. By linking these offline barriers to online participation strategies, this study provides a vulnerability-centric framework and actionable design insights for creating more equitable online tech communities that explicitly address complex, deeply rooted socio-cultural constraints in non-WEIRD contexts.
Hamza Naveed, Sheza Naveed, Raksha Hungund, Michaelanne Thomas
CHI2
2026 Nice to Know You're Not Alone: Co-designing Community-centered Online Safety and Privacy Education with Librarians
Tanisha Afnan, Sheza Naveed, Griffin Christie, Jackie Hu, Byron Lowens, Allison McDonald, Florian Schaub
SOUPS2
2026 How We Define Privacy Literacy: Teaching Experiences & Challenges of Community-Engaged Privacy Educators
abstract
This study examines the pedagogical approaches and experiences of community-engaged educators—individuals who teach privacy, online safety, or security to specific communities through community organizations, companies, or local institutions, such as libraries. We draw on interviews with 21 such educators across the United States and find that, unlike some privacy and security advice that may emphasize knowledge retention of common skills and strategies, these educators prioritized teaching for independent decision-making. Our participants conceptualized privacy literacy as a process for taking informed action, and, from their insights, we identified five core competencies of privacy literacy: (1) data fluency, (2) account security, (3) fraud detection, (4) information vetting, and (5) surveillance capitalism. Notably, these competencies integrate privacy, security, and online safety concepts into privacy literacy—reflecting an increasingly integrated threat landscape. Embedded within the communities they serve, these educators shared their deep understanding of their students’ needs, which varied dramatically, and shared ways in which they tailored their programming accordingly. However, educators also shared significant teaching constraints, including limited time, resources, and organizational support. We discuss the implications of our findings for privacy literacy and for supporting community-engaged privacy literacy efforts.
Tanisha Afnan, Sheza Naveed, Griffin Christie, Jackie Hu, Byron Lowens, Allison McDonald, Florian Schaub
Proc. Priv. Enhancing Technol.2
2022 "Ask this from the person who has private stuff": Privacy Perceptions, Behaviours and Beliefs Beyond W.E.I.R.D
abstract
We explore privacy perceptions, beliefs and practices of low-literate, low-income users in Pakistan, a patriarchal and religious context with a literacy rate of approx. 68% and where 59% of mobile users have less than 6 years of formal education. Through a qualitative study with 40 participants (17 male and 23 female) we examine the cultural, religious, and familial structures that impact users perceptions, management, and control of their personal privacy. We reveal significant gendered differences in privacy understandings, privacy preserving practices and the access to privacy related knowledge. Our work also highlights the seminal impact religious beliefs have on men and women’s understandings and management of privacy and the prolific use of after-market modified apps to support users specific privacy needs. The privacy concerns raised by our participants provide HCI researchers with valuable insights into designing privacy affordances for vulnerable and diverse populations beyond Western, educated, industrialized, rich and democratic contexts.
Sheza Naveed, Hamza Naveed, Mobin Javed, Maryam Mustafa
CHI1