Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Krishika Haresh Khemani

dblp:319/4223 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
0000-0003-1449-6812ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Interaction techniques and input · 44% User interface design and tools · 44% Design research and methods · 13%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
User interface design and tools
design guidelines
0.612022
Unpacking Practitioners' Attitudes Towards Codifications of Design Knowledge for Voice User Interfaces · CHI 2022
Interaction techniques and input
voice interaction
0.612022
Unpacking Practitioners' Attitudes Towards Codifications of Design Knowledge for Voice User Interfaces · CHI 2022
Design research and methods
design practice
0.212022
Unpacking Practitioners' Attitudes Towards Codifications of Design Knowledge for Voice User Interfaces · CHI 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

interview study · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 Unpacking Practitioners' Attitudes Towards Codifications of Design Knowledge for Voice User Interfaces
abstract
Recent HCI research has sought to develop guidelines—‘heuristics’, ‘best practices’, ‘principles’ and so on—for voice user interfaces (VUI) to aid both practitioners and researchers in improving the quality of VUI-based design. However, limited research is available on how such design knowledge is conceptualised and used by industry practitioners. We present a small interview-based study conducted with 9 experienced VUI industry practitioners. Their concerns range from terminological challenges associated with VUI design knowledge, the role of codifications of such knowledge like design guidelines alongside their practical design work, through to their views on the value of ‘harmonisation’ of VUI design knowledge. Given the complex—albeit preliminary—picture that emerges, we argue for HCI's deeper consideration of how design knowledge meshes with the contingencies of practice, so that VUI design knowledge—such as design guidelines developed in HCI—delivers the most potential value for industry practice.
Krishika Haresh Khemani, Stuart Reeves
CHI1