Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Krishika Haresh Khemani
dblp:319/4223
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
0000-0003-1449-6812ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper |
Interaction techniques and input · 44% User interface design and tools · 44% Design research and methods · 13% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
User interface design and tools
design guidelines |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Unpacking Practitioners' Attitudes Towards Codifications of Design Knowledge for Voice User Interfaces · CHI 2022 |
Interaction techniques and input
voice interaction |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Unpacking Practitioners' Attitudes Towards Codifications of Design Knowledge for Voice User Interfaces · CHI 2022 |
Design research and methods
design practice |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Unpacking Practitioners' Attitudes Towards Codifications of Design Knowledge for Voice User Interfaces · CHI 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
interview study · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | Unpacking Practitioners' Attitudes Towards Codifications of Design Knowledge for Voice User InterfacesabstractRecent HCI research has sought to develop guidelines—‘heuristics’, ‘best practices’, ‘principles’ and so on—for voice user interfaces (VUI) to aid both practitioners and researchers in improving the quality of VUI-based design. However, limited research is available on how such design knowledge is conceptualised and used by industry practitioners. We present a small interview-based study conducted with 9 experienced VUI industry practitioners. Their concerns range from terminological challenges associated with VUI design knowledge, the role of codifications of such knowledge like design guidelines alongside their practical design work, through to their views on the value of ‘harmonisation’ of VUI design knowledge. Given the complex—albeit preliminary—picture that emerges, we argue for HCI's deeper consideration of how design knowledge meshes with the contingencies of practice, so that VUI design knowledge—such as design guidelines developed in HCI—delivers the most potential value for industry practice. Krishika Haresh Khemani, Stuart Reeves |
CHI | 1 |