Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jacob Huh

dblp:319/4261 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Deep learning architectures and training · 40% Reinforcement learning · 26% Representation and self-supervised learning · 26%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Mathematical optimization · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › normalization
weight normalization
0.812024
Scalable Optimization in the Modular Norm · NeurIPS 2024
Mathematical optimization
lipschitz continuity
0.812024
Scalable Optimization in the Modular Norm · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › neural network representation learning › deep representation learning
autoencoder representation learning
0.512021
Learning to Ground Multi-Agent Communication with Autoencoders · NeurIPS 2021
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › multi-agent reinforcement learning
multi-agent communication
0.512021
Learning to Ground Multi-Agent Communication with Autoencoders · NeurIPS 2021
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Multi-agent systems
emergent communication
0.112021
Learning to Ground Multi-Agent Communication with Autoencoders · NeurIPS 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

recursive norm definition · 1.5modular norm · 1.5representation grounding · 0.5autoencoding · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Scalable Optimization in the Modular Norm
abstract
To improve performance in contemporary deep learning, one is interested in scaling up the neural network in terms of both the number and the size of the layers. When ramping up the width of a single layer, graceful scaling of training has been linked to the need to normalize the weights and their updates in the "natural norm" particular to that layer. In this paper, we significantly generalize this idea by defining the modular norm, which is the natural norm on the full weight space of any neural network architecture. The modular norm is defined recursively in tandem with the network architecture itself. We show that the modular norm has several promising applications. On the practical side, the modular norm can be used to normalize the updates of any base optimizer so that the learning rate becomes transferable across width and depth. This means that the user does not need to compute optimizer-specific scale factors in order to scale training. On the theoretical side, we show that for any neural network built from "well-behaved" atomic modules, the gradient of the network is Lipschitz-continuous in the modular norm, with the Lipschitz constant admitting a simple recursive formula. This characterization opens the door to porting standard ideas in optimization theory over to deep learning. We have created a Python package called Modula that automatically normalizes weight updates in the modular norm of the architecture. Both the Modula package and code for our experiments are provided in the supplementary material.
Tim Large, Jacob Huh, Hyojin Bahng, Phillip Isola, Jeremy Bernstein
NeurIPS3
2021 Learning to Ground Multi-Agent Communication with Autoencoders
abstract
Communication requires having a common language, a lingua franca, between agents. This language could emerge via a consensus process, but it may require many generations of trial and error. Alternatively, the lingua franca can be given by the environment, where agents ground their language in representations of the observed world. We demonstrate a simple way to ground language in learned representations, which facilitates decentralized multi-agent communication and coordination. We find that a standard representation learning algorithm -- autoencoding -- is sufficient for arriving at a grounded common language. When agents broadcast these representations, they learn to understand and respond to each other's utterances and achieve surprisingly strong task performance across a variety of multi-agent communication environments.
Toru Lin, Jacob Huh, Christopher Stauffer, Ser-Nam Lim, Phillip Isola
NeurIPS2