Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Clément Sarrazin
dblp:319/4470
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Mathematical optimization · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Mathematical optimization › convergence analysis
convergence bounds |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Non-asymptotic convergence bounds for Wasserstein approximation using point clouds · NeurIPS 2021 |
Mathematical optimization
gradient descent |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Non-asymptotic convergence bounds for Wasserstein approximation using point clouds · NeurIPS 2021 |
Mathematical optimization
nonconvex optimization |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Non-asymptotic convergence bounds for Wasserstein approximation using point clouds · NeurIPS 2021 |
Mathematical optimization › optimal transport
wasserstein distance approximation |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Non-asymptotic convergence bounds for Wasserstein approximation using point clouds · NeurIPS 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
power diagram · 0.5lloyd's algorithm · 0.5gradient descent · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | Non-asymptotic convergence bounds for Wasserstein approximation using point cloudsabstractSeveral issues in machine learning and inverse problems require to generate discrete data, as if sampled from a model probabilitydistribution. A common way to do so relies on the construction of a uniform probability distribution over a set of $N$ points whichminimizes the Wasserstein distance to the model distribution. This minimization problem, where the unknowns are the positions of the atoms, is non-convex. Yet, in most cases, a suitably adjusted version of Lloyd's algorithm in which Voronoi cells are replaced by Power cells, leads to configurations with small Wasserstein error. This is surprising because, again, of the non-convex nature of the problem, which moreover admits spurious critical points. We provide explicit upper bounds for the convergence speed of this Lloyd-type algorithm, starting from a cloud of points sufficiently far from each other. This already works after one step of the iteration procedure, and similar bounds can be deduced, for the corresponding gradient descent. These bounds naturally lead to a sort of Poliak-Łojasiewicz inequality for the Wasserstein distance cost, with an error term depending on the distances between Dirac masses in the discrete distribution. Quentin Mérigot, Filippo Santambrogio, Clément Sarrazin |
NeurIPS | 3 |