Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Clément Sarrazin

dblp:319/4470 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Mathematical optimization · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Mathematical optimization › convergence analysis
convergence bounds
0.512021
Non-asymptotic convergence bounds for Wasserstein approximation using point clouds · NeurIPS 2021
Mathematical optimization
gradient descent
0.512021
Non-asymptotic convergence bounds for Wasserstein approximation using point clouds · NeurIPS 2021
Mathematical optimization
nonconvex optimization
0.512021
Non-asymptotic convergence bounds for Wasserstein approximation using point clouds · NeurIPS 2021
Mathematical optimization › optimal transport
wasserstein distance approximation
0.512021
Non-asymptotic convergence bounds for Wasserstein approximation using point clouds · NeurIPS 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

power diagram · 0.5lloyd's algorithm · 0.5gradient descent · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2021 Non-asymptotic convergence bounds for Wasserstein approximation using point clouds
abstract
Several issues in machine learning and inverse problems require to generate discrete data, as if sampled from a model probabilitydistribution. A common way to do so relies on the construction of a uniform probability distribution over a set of $N$ points whichminimizes the Wasserstein distance to the model distribution. This minimization problem, where the unknowns are the positions of the atoms, is non-convex. Yet, in most cases, a suitably adjusted version of Lloyd's algorithm in which Voronoi cells are replaced by Power cells, leads to configurations with small Wasserstein error. This is surprising because, again, of the non-convex nature of the problem, which moreover admits spurious critical points. We provide explicit upper bounds for the convergence speed of this Lloyd-type algorithm, starting from a cloud of points sufficiently far from each other. This already works after one step of the iteration procedure, and similar bounds can be deduced, for the corresponding gradient descent. These bounds naturally lead to a sort of Poliak-Łojasiewicz inequality for the Wasserstein distance cost, with an error term depending on the distances between Dirac masses in the discrete distribution.
Quentin Mérigot, Filippo Santambrogio, Clément Sarrazin
NeurIPS3