Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Yazid Janati El Idrissi
dblp:319/4479
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 54% Generative modeling · 25% Deep learning architectures and training · 11% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Computational photography and imaging · 100% |
Topics — the 12 heaviest of 12, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference
bayesian inference |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Monte Carlo guided Denoising Diffusion models for Bayesian linear inverse problems · ICLR 2024 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Monte Carlo guided Denoising Diffusion models for Bayesian linear inverse problems · ICLR 2024 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
score-based generative model |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Monte Carlo guided Denoising Diffusion models for Bayesian linear inverse problems · ICLR 2024 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › monte carlo methods › markov chain monte carlo
particle gibbs |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | State and parameter learning with PARIS particle Gibbs · ICML 2023 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › language modeling
smoothing |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | State and parameter learning with PARIS particle Gibbs · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
state space model |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | State and parameter learning with PARIS particle Gibbs · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › monte carlo methods
importance sampling |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | NEO: Non Equilibrium Sampling on the Orbits of a Deterministic Transform · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › monte carlo methods
markov chain monte carlo |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | NEO: Non Equilibrium Sampling on the Orbits of a Deterministic Transform · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference
partition function estimation |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | NEO: Non Equilibrium Sampling on the Orbits of a Deterministic Transform · NeurIPS 2021 |
Computational photography and imaging
computational photography |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Monte Carlo guided Denoising Diffusion models for Bayesian linear inverse problems · ICLR 2024 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › latent variable model
hidden markov model |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | State and parameter learning with PARIS particle Gibbs · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › sampling
multimodal sampling |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | NEO: Non Equilibrium Sampling on the Orbits of a Deterministic Transform · NeurIPS 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
sequential monte carlo · 1.5denoising diffusion · 1.5rao-blackwellization · 0.7parisian particle gibbs · 0.7conditional SMC · 0.7non-equilibrium orbits · 0.5iterated sampling-importance-resampling · 0.5conformal hamiltonian system · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Monte Carlo guided Denoising Diffusion models for Bayesian linear inverse problemsabstractIll-posed linear inverse problems arise frequently in various applications, from computational photography to medical imaging.
A recent line of research exploits Bayesian inference with informative priors to handle the ill-posedness of such problems.
Amongst such priors, score-based generative models (SGM) have recently been successfully applied to several different inverse problems.
In this study, we exploit the particular structure of the prior defined by the SGM to define a sequence of intermediate linear inverse problems. As the noise level decreases, the posteriors of these inverse problems get closer to the target posterior of the original inverse problem.
To sample from this sequence of posteriors, we propose the use of Sequential Monte Carlo (SMC) methods.
The proposed algorithm, \algo, is shown to be theoretically grounded and we provide numerical simulations showing that it outperforms competing baselines when dealing with ill-posed inverse problems in a Bayesian setting. Gabriel Cardoso 0001, Yazid Janati El Idrissi, Sylvain Le Corff, Eric Moulines |
ICLR | 2 |
| 2023 | State and parameter learning with PARIS particle GibbsabstractNon-linear state-space models, also known as general hidden Markov models (HMM), are ubiquitous in statistical machine learning, being the most classical generative models for serial data and sequences. Learning in HMM, either via Maximum Likelihood Estimation (MLE) or Markov Score Climbing (MSC) requires the estimation of the- smoothing expectation of some additive functionals. Controlling the bias and the variance of this estimation is crucial to establish the convergence of learning algorithms. Our first contribution is to design a novel additive smoothing algorithm, the Parisian particle Gibbs (PPG) sampler, which can be viewed as a PaRIS (Olsson, Westerborn 2017) algorithm driven by conditional SMC moves, resulting in bias-reduced estimates of the targeted quantities. We substantiate the PPG algorithm with theoretical results, including new bounds on bias and variance as well as deviation inequalities. We then establish, in the learning context, and under standard assumptions, non-asymptotic bounds highlighting the value of bias reduction and the implicit Rao--Blackwellization of PPG. These are the first non-asymptotic results of this kind in this setting. We illustrate our theoretical results with numerical experiments supporting our claims. Gabriel Cardoso 0001, Yazid Janati El Idrissi, Sylvain Le Corff, Eric Moulines, Jimmy Olsson |
ICML | 2 |
| 2021 | NEO: Non Equilibrium Sampling on the Orbits of a Deterministic TransformabstractSampling from a complex distribution $\pi$ and approximating its intractable normalizing constant $\mathrm{Z}$ are challenging problems. In this paper, a novel family of importance samplers (IS) and Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) samplers is derived. Given an invertible map $\mathrm{T}$, these schemes combine (with weights) elements from the forward and backward Orbits through points sampled from a proposal distribution $\rho$. The map $\mathrm{T}$ does not leave the target $\pi$ invariant, hence the name NEO, standing for Non-Equilibrium Orbits. NEO-IS provides unbiased estimators of the normalizing constant and self-normalized IS estimators of expectations under $\pi$ while NEO-MCMC combines multiple NEO-IS estimates of the normalizing constant and an iterated sampling-importance resampling mechanism to sample from $\pi$. For $\mathrm{T}$ chosen as a discrete-time integrator of a conformal Hamiltonian system, NEO-IS achieves state-of-the art performance on difficult benchmarks and NEO-MCMC is able to explore highly multimodal targets. Additionally, we provide detailed theoretical results for both methods. In particular, we show that NEO-MCMC is uniformly geometrically ergodic and establish explicit mixing time estimates under mild conditions. Achille Thin, Yazid Janati El Idrissi, Sylvain Le Corff, Charles Ollion, Eric Moulines, Arnaud Doucet, Alain Durmus, Christian X. Robert |
NeurIPS | 2 |