Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Sören Schröder

dblp:319/5223 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0001-5008-8117ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 2 · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
2 papers
Personal fabrication and tangible interfaces · 77% Wearable and physiological sensing · 14% Interaction techniques and input · 9%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Personal fabrication and tangible interfaces
shape-changing interfaces
1.012026
Emotion Through Motion: How Shape-Changing Jewelry Conveys Emotions · CHI 2026
Personal fabrication and tangible interfaces › smart textiles
textile interfaces
0.712023
What's That Shape? Investigating Eyes-Free Recognition of Textile Icons · CHI 2023
Interaction techniques and input › non-visual interaction
eyes-free interaction
0.212023
What's That Shape? Investigating Eyes-Free Recognition of Textile Icons · CHI 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

recognition study · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Emotion Through Motion: How Shape-Changing Jewelry Conveys Emotions
Anke Brocker, Felix Kasteel, Sören Schröder, Heiko Müller 0002, Jürgen Steimle, Jan O. Borchers
CHI3
2023 What's That Shape? Investigating Eyes-Free Recognition of Textile Icons
abstract
Textile surfaces, such as on sofas, cushions, and clothes, offer promising alternative locations to place controls for digital devices. Textiles are a natural, even abundant part of living spaces, and support unobtrusive input. While there is solid work on technical implementations of textile interfaces, there is little guidance regarding their design—especially their haptic cues, which are essential for eyes-free use. In particular, icons easily communicate information visually in a compact fashion, but it is unclear how to adapt them to the haptics-centric textile interface experience. Therefore, we investigated the recognizability of 84 haptic icons on fabrics. Each combines a shape, height profile (raised, recessed, or flat), and affected area (filled or outline). Our participants clearly preferred raised icons, and identified them with the highest accuracy and at competitive speeds. We also provide insights into icons that look very different, but are hard to distinguish via touch alone.
René Schäfer, Oliver Nowak 0002, Lovis Bero Suchmann, Sören Schröder, Jan O. Borchers
CHI4