Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Avijeet Ghosh

dblp:319/5990 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021Theory of computation · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
3 papers
Logic in computer science · 46% Automated reasoning and model checking · 29% Computational complexity · 25%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Knowledge representation and reasoning · 100%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › logic in computer science › logical foundations › non-classical logics
epistemic logic
0.912025
Reasoning About Knowledge on Regular Expressions Is 2EXPTIME-Complete · KR 2025
Logic in computer science › completeness
2EXPTIME-completeness
0.912025
Reasoning About Knowledge on Regular Expressions Is 2EXPTIME-Complete · KR 2025
Automated reasoning and model checking
satisfiability
0.912025
Reasoning About Knowledge on Regular Expressions Is 2EXPTIME-Complete · KR 2025
Logic in computer science
epistemic logic
0.712023
On Simple Expectations and Observations of Intelligent Agents: A Complexity Study · KR 2023
Logic in computer science › epistemic logic
dynamic epistemic logic
0.612022
On Verifying Expectations and Observations of Intelligent Agents · IJCAI 2022
Automated reasoning and model checking
model checking
0.612022
On Verifying Expectations and Observations of Intelligent Agents · IJCAI 2022
Computational complexity › complexity of reasoning
model checking complexity
0.612022
On Verifying Expectations and Observations of Intelligent Agents · IJCAI 2022
Logic in computer science › epistemic logic › dynamic epistemic logic
public announcement logic
0.212023
On Simple Expectations and Observations of Intelligent Agents: A Complexity Study · KR 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

epistemic logic · 1.7automata theory · 1.7complexity analysis · 1.2model checking · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Reasoning About Knowledge on Regular Expressions Is 2EXPTIME-Complete
abstract
Logics for reasoning about knowledge and actions have seen many applications in various domains of multi-agent systems, including epistemic planning. Change of knowledge based on observations about the surroundings forms a key aspect in such planning scenarios. Public Observation Logic (POL) is a variant of public announcement logic for reasoning about knowledge that gets updated based on public observations. Each state in an epistemic (Kripke) model is equipped with a set of expected observations. These states evolve as the expectations get matched with the actual observations. In this work, we prove that the satisfiability problem of POL is 2EXPTIME-complete.
Avijeet Ghosh, Sujata Ghosh, François Schwarzentruber
KR1
2023 On Simple Expectations and Observations of Intelligent Agents: A Complexity Study
abstract
Public observation logic (POL) reasons about agent expectations and agent observations in various real world situations. The expectations of agents take shape based on certain protocols about the world around and they remove those possible scenarios where their exceptions and observations do not match. This in turn influences the epistemic reasoning of these agents. In this work, we study the computational complexity of the satisfaction problems of various fragments of POL. In the process, we also highlight the inevitable link that these fragments have with the well-studied Public announcement logic.
Sourav Chakraborty 0001, Avijeet Ghosh, Sujata Ghosh, François Schwarzentruber
KR2
2022 On Verifying Expectations and Observations of Intelligent Agents
abstract
Public observation logic (POL) is a variant of dynamic epistemic logic to reason about agent expectations and agent observations. Agents have certain expectations, regarding the situation at hand, that are actuated by the relevant protocols, and they eliminate possible worlds in which their expectations do not match with their observations. In this work, we investigate the computational complexity of the model checking problem for POL and prove its PSPACE-completeness. We also study various syntactic fragments of POL. We exemplify the applicability of POL model checking in verifying different characteristics and features of an interactive system with respect to the distinct expectations and (matching) observations of the system. Finally, we provide a discussion on the implementation of the model checking algorithms.
Sourav Chakraborty 0001, Avijeet Ghosh, Sujata Ghosh, François Schwarzentruber
IJCAI2