Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Stergios Verros

dblp:319/6451 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Systems, architecture and hardware · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Accessibility and assistive technology · 44% Human-robot interaction · 44% Health and well-being technologies · 13%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Human-robot interaction › physical human-robot interaction
admittance control
0.312018
Comparing Assistive Admittance Control Algorithms for a Trunk Supporting Exoskeleton · ICRA 2018
Accessibility and assistive technology › assistive technology
assistive exoskeleton
0.312018
Comparing Assistive Admittance Control Algorithms for a Trunk Supporting Exoskeleton · ICRA 2018
Health and well-being technologies › rehabilitation technology
rehabilitation robotics
0.112018
Comparing Assistive Admittance Control Algorithms for a Trunk Supporting Exoskeleton · ICRA 2018

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

variable admittance control · 0.3feedforward control · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2018 Comparing Assistive Admittance Control Algorithms for a Trunk Supporting Exoskeleton
abstract
Duchenne muscular dystrophy leaves patients with severe dependency on health care. In an effort to increase independence and quality of life, active exoskeletons are developed to support activities of daily living. This study is dedicated to the development and assessment of three different admittance control algorithms for a trunk supporting robot; a law with constant parameters, a law with added feed-forward force, and a law with variable parameters. A Fitts'-like experiment with 12 healthy subjects was performed to compare the control laws. The results show decreased movement times for the feedforward and variable admittance controllers with respect to the standard admittance.
Peter Gilius Van Lenthe, Stergios Verros, Edsko E. G. Hekman, Raffaella Carloni, H. F. J. M. Koopman
ICRA2