Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
D. Benjamin Gordon
dblp:32/1185
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
0000-0003-0619-7791ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 4 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
3 papers |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene regulation
gene regulatory network |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Prediction of whole-cell transcriptional response with machine learning · Bioinform. 2022 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
systems biology |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Prediction of whole-cell transcriptional response with machine learning · Bioinform. 2022 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › sequence analysis
motif discovery |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | A hypothesis-based approach for identifying the binding specificity of regulatory proteins from chromatin immunoprecipitation data · Bioinform. 2006 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene regulation
regulatory genomics |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | A hypothesis-based approach for identifying the binding specificity of regulatory proteins from chromatin immunoprecipitation data · Bioinform. 2006 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene regulation
transcription factor binding site prediction |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | A hypothesis-based approach for identifying the binding specificity of regulatory proteins from chromatin immunoprecipitation data · Bioinform. 2006 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene regulation
transcriptional regulation analysis |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | TAMO: a flexible, object-oriented framework for analyzing transcriptional regulation using DNA-sequence motifs · Bioinform. 2005 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › epigenomics
ChIP-chip analysis |
0.0 | 1 | 2006 | A hypothesis-based approach for identifying the binding specificity of regulatory proteins from chromatin immunoprecipitation data · Bioinform. 2006 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
machine learning · 0.6high-throughput sequencing · 0.6RNA-seq · 0.6cross-validation · 0.1constrained local optimization · 0.1object-oriented framework · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | Prediction of whole-cell transcriptional response with machine learningabstractMOTIVATION: Applications in synthetic and systems biology can benefit from measuring whole-cell response to biochemical perturbations. Execution of experiments to cover all possible combinations of perturbations is infeasible. In this paper, we present the host response model (HRM), a machine learning approach that maps response of single perturbations to transcriptional response of the combination of perturbations. RESULTS: The HRM combines high-throughput sequencing with machine learning to infer links between experimental context, prior knowledge of cell regulatory networks, and RNASeq data to predict a gene's dysregulation. We find that the HRM can predict the directionality of dysregulation to a combination of inducers with an accuracy of >90% using data from single inducers. We further find that the use of prior, known cell regulatory networks doubles the predictive performance of the HRM (an R2 from 0.3 to 0.65). The model was validated in two organisms, Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis, using new experiments conducted after training. Finally, while the HRM is trained with gene expression data, the direct prediction of differential expression makes it possible to also conduct enrichment analyses using its predictions. We show that the HRM can accurately classify >95% of the pathway regulations. The HRM reduces the number of RNASeq experiments needed as responses can be tested in silico prior to the experiment. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The HRM software and tutorial are available at https://github.com/sd2e/CDM and the configurable differential expression analysis tools and tutorials are available at https://github.com/SD2E/omics_tools. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Mohammed Eslami, Amin Espah Borujeni, Hamed Eramian, Mark Weston, George Zheng, Joshua Urrutia, Carolyn Corbet, Diveena Becker, Paul Maschhoff, Katie Clowers, Alexander Cristofaro, Hamid Doost Hosseini, D. Benjamin Gordon, Yuval Dorfan, Jedediah Singer, Matthew W. Vaughn, Niall Gaffney, John M. Fonner, Joe Stubbs, Christopher A. Voigt, Enoch Yeung |
Bioinform. | 13 |
| 2006 | A hypothesis-based approach for identifying the binding specificity of regulatory proteins from chromatin immunoprecipitation dataabstractMOTIVATION: Genome-wide chromatin-immunoprecipitation (ChIP-chip) detects binding of transcriptional regulators to DNA in vivo at low resolution. Motif discovery algorithms can be used to discover sequence patterns in the bound regions that may be recognized by the immunoprecipitated protein. However, the discovered motifs often do not agree with the binding specificity of the protein, when it is known. RESULTS: We present a powerful approach to analyzing ChIP-chip data, called THEME, that tests hypotheses concerning the sequence specificity of a protein. Hypotheses are refined using constrained local optimization. Cross-validation provides a principled standard for selecting the optimal weighting of the hypothesis and the ChIP-chip data and for choosing the best refined hypothesis. We demonstrate how to derive hypotheses for proteins from 36 domain families. Using THEME together with these hypotheses, we analyze ChIP-chip datasets for 14 human and mouse proteins. In all the cases the identified motifs are consistent with the published data with regard to the binding specificity of the proteins. Kenzie D. MacIsaac, D. Benjamin Gordon, Lena Nekludova, Duncan T. Odom, Joerg Schreiber, David K. Gifford, Richard A. Young, Ernest Fraenkel |
Bioinform. | 2 |
| 2006 | An improved map of conserved regulatory sites for Saccharomyces cerevisiaeabstractBACKGROUND: The regulatory map of a genome consists of the binding sites for proteins that determine the transcription of nearby genes. An initial regulatory map for S. cerevisiae was recently published using six motif discovery programs to analyze genome-wide chromatin immunoprecipitation data for 203 transcription factors. The programs were used to identify sequence motifs that were likely to correspond to the DNA-binding specificity of the immunoprecipitated proteins. We report improved versions of two conservation-based motif discovery algorithms, PhyloCon and Converge. Using these programs, we create a refined regulatory map for S. cerevisiae by reanalyzing the same chromatin immunoprecipitation data. RESULTS: Applying the same conservative criteria that were applied in the original study, we find that PhyloCon and Converge each separately discover more known specificities than the combination of all six programs in the previous study. Combining the results of PhyloCon and Converge, we discover significant sequence motifs for 36 transcription factors that were previously missed. The new set of motifs identifies 636 more regulatory interactions than the previous one. The new network contains 28% more regulatory interactions among transcription factors, evidence of greater cross-talk between regulators. CONCLUSION: Combining two complementary computational strategies for conservation-based motif discovery improves the ability to identify the specificity of transcriptional regulators from genome-wide chromatin immunoprecipitation data. The increased sensitivity of these methods significantly expands the map of yeast regulatory sites without the need to alter any of the thresholds for statistical significance. The new map of regulatory sites reveals a more elaborate and complex view of the yeast genetic regulatory network than was observed previously. Kenzie D. MacIsaac, D. Benjamin Gordon, David K. Gifford, Gary D. Stormo, Ernest Fraenkel |
BMC Bioinform. | 3 |
| 2005 | TAMO: a flexible, object-oriented framework for analyzing transcriptional regulation using DNA-sequence motifs
D. Benjamin Gordon, Lena Nekludova, Scott McCallum, Ernest Fraenkel |
Bioinform. | 1 |