Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Michael Farrar

dblp:32/2160 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2017
0000-0002-5569-0366ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Parallel and multicore computing · 50% Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures · 50%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology
sequence alignment
0.112007
Striped Smith-Waterman speeds database searches six times over other SIMD implementations · Bioinform. 2007
Parallel and multicore computing › parallel computing › parallel bioinformatics
parallel sequence search
0.012007
Striped Smith-Waterman speeds database searches six times over other SIMD implementations · Bioinform. 2007
Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures › data-parallel accelerator
SIMD accelerator
0.012007
Striped Smith-Waterman speeds database searches six times over other SIMD implementations · Bioinform. 2007

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

instruction-level parallelism · 0.1SIMD instructions · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2017 Combination therapeutics of Nilotinib and radiation in acute lymphoblastic leukemia as an effective method against drug-resistance
abstract
Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph+) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is characterized by a very poor prognosis and a high likelihood of acquired chemo-resistance.Although tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy has improved clinical outcome, most ALL patients relapse following treatment with TKI due to the development of resistance.We developed an in vitro model of Nilotinib-resistant Ph+ leukemia cells to investigate whether low dose radiation (LDR) in combination with TKI therapy overcome chemo-resistance.Additionally, we developed a mathematical model, parameterized by cell viability experiments under Nilotinib treatment and LDR, to explain the cellular response to combination therapy.The addition of LDR significantly reduced drug resistance both in vitro and in computational model.Decreased expression level of phosphorylated AKT suggests that the combination treatment plays an important role in overcoming resistance through the AKT pathway.Modelpredicted cellular responses to the combined therapy provide good agreement with experimental results.Augmentation of LDR and Nilotinib therapy seems to be beneficial to control Ph+ leukemia resistance and the quantitative model can determine optimal dosing schedule to enhance the effectiveness of the combination therapy. Author summaryHigh likelihood of evolution of resistance to therapy is common in most forms of leukemia.This issue persists for tyrosine kinase inhibitor drug treatments as well as other forms of therapies.In the current work, we suggest a combination therapy where Ph+ acute lymphoblastic leukemic cells are treated with low-dose radiation before chemotherapy (Nilotinib).
Kamran Kaveh, Michael Farrar, Guy Storme, Marcucci Guido, Jamie Piepenburg, Jackson Penning, Jasmine Foo, Kevin Leder, Susanta K. Hui
PLoS Comput. Biol.3
2007 Striped Smith-Waterman speeds database searches six times over other SIMD implementations
abstract
MOTIVATION: The only algorithm guaranteed to find the optimal local alignment is the Smith-Waterman. It is also one of the slowest due to the number of computations required for the search. To speed up the algorithm, Single-Instruction Multiple-Data (SIMD) instructions have been used to parallelize the algorithm at the instruction level. RESULTS: A faster implementation of the Smith-Waterman algorithm is presented. This algorithm achieved 2-8 times performance improvement over other SIMD based Smith-Waterman implementations. On a 2.0 GHz Xeon Core 2 Duo processor, speeds of >3.0 billion cell updates/s were achieved. AVAILABILITY: http://farrar.michael.googlepages.com/Smith-waterman
Michael Farrar
Bioinform.1