EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Claus Hofmann
dblp:32/2888
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Trustworthy machine learning · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness › out-of-distribution detection
outlier exposure |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Energy-based Hopfield Boosting for Out-of-Distribution Detection · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
out-of-distribution detection |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Energy-based Hopfield Boosting for Out-of-Distribution Detection · NeurIPS 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
outlier exposure · 0.8hopfield energy · 0.8boosting · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Energy-based Hopfield Boosting for Out-of-Distribution DetectionabstractOut-of-distribution (OOD) detection is critical when deploying machine learning models in the real world. Outlier exposure methods, which incorporate auxiliary outlier data in the training process, can drastically improve OOD detection performance compared to approaches without advanced training strategies. We introduce Hopfield Boosting, a boosting approach, which leverages modern Hopfield energy to sharpen the decision boundary between the in-distribution and OOD data. Hopfield Boosting encourages the model to focus on hard-to-distinguish auxiliary outlier examples that lie close to the decision boundary between in-distribution and auxiliary outlier data. Our method achieves a new state-of-the-art in OOD detection with outlier exposure, improving the FPR95 from 2.28 to 0.92 on CIFAR-10, from 11.76 to 7.94 on CIFAR-100, and from 50.74 to 36.60 on ImageNet-1K. Claus Hofmann, Simon Schmid, Bernhard Lehner, Daniel Klotz, Sepp Hochreiter |
NeurIPS | 1 |