Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Kavita Ravi
dblp:32/3103
· DBLP profile ↗
19ranked-venue papers
7as first author
0since 2021 · last 2008
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 9 · 3 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 7 · 4 first-authorTheory of computation · 7 · 2 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-authorHuman-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers |
Electronic design automation · 100% | |
| Theoretical computer science
4 papers |
Automated reasoning and model checking · 74% Algorithms and data structures · 15% Coding theory · 11% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
3D vision · 87% Robot manipulation · 13% |
Topics — the 15 heaviest of 15, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test › functional verification
constrained random verification |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Application of Formal Word-Level Analysis to Constrained Random Simulation · CAV 2008 |
Electronic design automation
hardware verification and test |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Application of Formal Word-Level Analysis to Constrained Random Simulation · CAV 2008 |
Automated reasoning and model checking › model checking › temporal logic model checking
CTL model checking |
0.0 | 1 | 2000 | Symbolic guided search for CTL model checking · DAC 2000 |
Automated reasoning and model checking
fixpoint computation |
0.0 | 1 | 2000 | To split or to conjoin: the question in image computation · DAC 2000 |
Automated reasoning and model checking
image computation |
0.0 | 1 | 2000 | To split or to conjoin: the question in image computation · DAC 2000 |
Algorithms and data structures › search algorithms
state-space search |
0.0 | 1 | 2000 | Symbolic guided search for CTL model checking · DAC 2000 |
Automated reasoning and model checking › model checking › temporal logic model checking
LTL model checking |
0.0 | 1 | 1999 | Efficient Decision Procedures for Model Checking of Linear Time Logic Properties · CAV 1999 |
Automated reasoning and model checking
model checking |
0.0 | 1 | 1999 | Efficient Decision Procedures for Model Checking of Linear Time Logic Properties · CAV 1999 |
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test
formal verification |
0.0 | 1 | 1998 | Approximation and Decomposition of Binary Decision Diagrams · DAC 1998 |
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test
hardware verification |
0.0 | 1 | 1998 | Approximation and Decomposition of Binary Decision Diagrams · DAC 1998 |
Coding theory › error-correcting codes › decoding › minimum distance decoding
bounded-distance decoding |
0.0 | 1 | 1998 | Approximation and Decomposition of Binary Decision Diagrams · DAC 1998 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › camera calibration
active calibration |
0.0 | 1 | 1995 | Active Camera Calibration Using Pan, Tilt and Roll · ICRA 1995 |
Computer vision › 3D vision
camera calibration |
0.0 | 1 | 1995 | Active Camera Calibration Using Pan, Tilt and Roll · ICRA 1995 |
Automated reasoning and model checking
reachability |
0.0 | 1 | 2000 | To split or to conjoin: the question in image computation · DAC 2000 |
Robotics › Robot manipulation
robot vision |
0.0 | 1 | 1995 | Active Camera Calibration Using Pan, Tilt and Roll · ICRA 1995 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
word-level analysis · 0.1reachability analysis · 0.0symbolic model checking · 0.0symbolic guided search · 0.0recursive case splitting · 0.0conjunction · 0.0decision procedure · 0.0robust estimation · 0.0pan-tilt-roll motion · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | Application of Formal Word-Level Analysis to Constrained Random Simulation
Hyondeuk Kim, HoonSang Jin, Kavita Ravi, Petr Spacek, John Pierce, Robert P. Kurshan, Fabio Somenzi |
CAV | 3 |
| 2008 | A Hybrid Algorithm for LTL Games
Saqib Sohail, Fabio Somenzi, Kavita Ravi |
VMCAI | 3 |
| 2006 | Compositional SCC Analysis for Language Emptiness
Chao Wang 0001, Roderick Bloem, Gary D. Hachtel, Kavita Ravi, Fabio Somenzi |
Formal Methods Syst. Des. | 4 |
| 2004 | Minimal Assignments for Bounded Model Checking
Kavita Ravi, Fabio Somenzi |
TACAS | 1 |
| 2004 | Fate and free will in error traces
HoonSang Jin, Kavita Ravi, Fabio Somenzi |
Int. J. Softw. Tools Technol. Transf. | 2 |
| 2002 | Analysis of Symbolic SCC Hull Algorithms
Fabio Somenzi, Kavita Ravi, Roderick Bloem |
FMCAD | 2 |
| 2002 | Fate and Free Will in Error Traces
HoonSang Jin, Kavita Ravi, Fabio Somenzi |
TACAS | 2 |
| 2001 | Divide and Compose: SCC Refinement for Language Emptiness
Chao Wang 0001, Roderick Bloem, Gary D. Hachtel, Kavita Ravi, Fabio Somenzi |
CONCUR | 4 |
| 2000 | Symbolic guided search for CTL model checkingabstractCTL model checking of complex systems often suffers from the state-explosion problem. We propose using Symbolic Guided Search to avoid difficult-to-represent sections of the state space and prevent state explosion from occurring. Roderick Bloem, Kavita Ravi, Fabio Somenzi |
DAC | 2 |
| 2000 | To split or to conjoin: the question in image computationabstractImage computation is the key step in fixpoint computations that are extensively used in model checking. Two techniques have been used for this step: one based on conjunction of the terms of the transition relation, and the other based on recursive case splitting. We discuss when one technique outperforms the other, and consequently formulate a hybrid approach to image computation. Experimental results show that the hybrid algorithm is much more robust than the “pure” algorithms and outperforms both of them in most cases. Our findings also shed light on the remark of several researchers that splitting is especially effective in approximate reachability analysis. In-Ho Moon, James H. Kukula, Kavita Ravi, Fabio Somenzi |
DAC | 3 |
| 2000 | A Comparative Study of Symbolic Algorithms for the Computation of Fair Cycles
Kavita Ravi, Roderick Bloem, Fabio Somenzi |
FMCAD | 1 |
| 1999 | Efficient Decision Procedures for Model Checking of Linear Time Logic Properties
Roderick Bloem, Kavita Ravi, Fabio Somenzi |
CAV | 2 |
| 1999 | Efficient Fixpoint Computation for Invariant CheckingabstractTechniques for the computation of fixpoints are key to the success of many formal verification algorithms. To be efficient, these techniques must take into account how sets of states are represented. When BDDs are used, this means controlling, directly or indirectly, the size of the BDDs. Traditional fixpoint computations do little to keep BDD sizes small, apart from reordering variables. In this paper, we present a new strategy that attempts to keep the size of the BDDs under control at every stage of the computation. Our contribution includes also new techniques to compute partial images, and to speed up and test convergence. We present experimental results that prove the effectiveness of our strategy by demonstrating up to 40 orders of magnitude improvement in the number of states computed. Kavita Ravi, Fabio Somenzi |
ICCD | 1 |
| 1998 | Approximation and Decomposition of Binary Decision DiagramsabstractEfficient techniques for the manipulation of Binary Decision Diagrams (BDDs) are key to the success of formal verification tools. Recent advances in reachability analysis and model checking algorithms have emphasized the need for efficient algorithms for the approximation and decomposition of BDDs. In this paper we present a new algorithm for approximation and analyze its performance in comparison with existing techniques. We also introduce a new decomposition algorithm that produces balanced partitions. The effectiveness of our contributions is demonstrated by improved results in reachability analysis for some hard problem instances. Kavita Ravi, Kenneth L. McMillan, Thomas R. Shiple, Fabio Somenzi |
DAC | 1 |
| 1997 | Active camera calibration using pan, tilt and rollabstractThree dimensional vision applications, such as robot vision, require modeling of the relationship between the two-dimensional images and the three-dimensional world. Camera calibration is a process which accurately models this relationship. The calibration procedure determines the geometric parameters of the camera, such as focal length and center of the image. Most of the existing calibration techniques use predefined patterns and a static camera. Recently, a novel calibration technique for computing the focal length and image center, which uses an active camera, has been developed. This technique does not require any predefined patterns or point-to-point correspondence between images-only a set of scenes with some stable edges. It was observed that the algorithms developed for the image center are sensitive to noise and hence unreliable in real situations. This report extends the techniques provided to develop a simpler, yet more robust method for computing the image center. Anup Basu, Kavita Ravi |
IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part B | 2 |
| 1996 | Modular Verification of Multipliers
Kavita Ravi, Abelardo Pardo, Gary D. Hachtel, Fabio Somenzi |
FMCAD | 1 |
| 1995 | High-density reachability analysisabstractWe address the problem of reachability analysis for large finite state systems. Symbolic techniques have revolutionized reachability analysis but still have limitations in traversing large systems. We present techniques to improve the symbolic breadth-first traversal and compute a lower bound on the reachable states. We identify the problem as one of density during traversal and our techniques seek to improve the same. Our results show a marked improvement on the existing breadth-first traversal methods. Kavita Ravi, Fabio Somenzi |
ICCAD | 1 |
| 1995 | Active Camera Calibration Using Pan, Tilt and RollabstractThree dimensional vision applications, such as robot vision, require modelling of the relationship between the 2D images and the 3D world. Camera calibration is a process which accurately models this relationship. The calibration procedure determines the geometric parameters of the camera, such as focal length and center of the image. Most of the existing calibration techniques use predefined patterns and a static camera. Recently, A. Basu (1993) developed a novel calibration technique for computing the focal length and image center which uses an active camera. This technique does not require any predefined patterns or point to point correspondence between images-only a set of scenes with some stable edges. It was observed that the algorithms developed for image center are sensitive to noise and hence unreliable in real situations. The article extends the techniques provided by Basu to develop a simpler, yet more robust method for computing the image center. Anup Basu, Kavita Ravi |
ICRA | 2 |
| 1995 | An active technique for piecewise calibration of robot manipulatorsabstractRobot calibration is essential to improve the positioning accuracy of robot manipulators. A mathematical (kinematic) model is used to describe the geometric structure of a robot manipulator. Robot calibration procedure involves calculating and improving the values of this model's parameters. The robot calibration technique presented in this paper uses a vision system, to calibrate the kinematic model. For an n-linked robot manipulator, the procedure calibrates one link at a time, starting with the n/sup th/ link by making small movements. The resulting equations are linear, consequently, the algorithms are simple. Kavita Ravi, Anup Basu |
IROS (1) | 1 |