Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
A. U. Shankar
dblp:32/4026
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 1986
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Computer networks · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer networks
1 paper |
Transport protocols and congestion control · 70% Network management and operations · 30% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Transport protocols and congestion control
flow control |
0.0 | 1 | 1986 | A verified sliding window protocol with variable flow control · SIGCOMM 1986 |
Network management and operations
protocol verification |
0.0 | 1 | 1986 | A verified sliding window protocol with variable flow control · SIGCOMM 1986 |
Transport protocols and congestion control
window protocol |
0.0 | 1 | 1986 | A verified sliding window protocol with variable flow control · SIGCOMM 1986 |
Transport protocols and congestion control › transport protocols
reliable data transfer |
0.0 | 1 | 1986 | A verified sliding window protocol with variable flow control · SIGCOMM 1986 |
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1986 | A verified sliding window protocol with variable flow controlabstractWe present a verified sliding window protocol which uses modulo-N sequence numbers to achieve reliable flow-controlled data transfer between a source and a destination. Communication channels are assumed to lose, duplicate and reorder messages in transit. The destination's data needs are represented by a receive window whose size can vary with time. The destination entity uses acknowledgement messages to inform the source entity of the current receive window size and the sequence number of the data word next expected. The source entity responds by sending segments of data words that lie within the allowed window. Each data segment is accompanied by an identifying sequence number and the size of the data segment. The destination entity also uses selective acknowledgement and selective reject messages to inform the source entity of the reception or lack of reception, respectively, of out-of-sequence data segments. Thus, this protocol is a proper extension of the Arpanet's TCP. We have obtained the minimum value of N that ensures correct data transfer and flow control, in terms of the minimum message transmission time, the maximum message lifetime, and the maximum receive window size. The protocol imposes no constraints on the retransmissions of messages or on the data segment sizes; thus, any retransmission policy that optimizes the protocol's performance can be used. A. U. Shankar |
SIGCOMM | 1 |