Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Dana Campbell
dblp:32/4402
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2004
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Visualization and visual analytics · 100% | |
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper |
Interaction techniques and input · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Visualization and visual analytics
biological data visualization |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | Visualizations for taxonomic and phylogenetic trees · Bioinform. 2004 |
Visualization and visual analytics › biological data visualization
phylogenetic tree visualization |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | Visualizations for taxonomic and phylogenetic trees · Bioinform. 2004 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
integrated search and browsing · 0.1coupled interaction · 0.1animation · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2004 | How users interact with biodiversity information using TaxonTreeabstractBiodiversity databases have recently become widely available to the public and to other researchers. To retrieve information from these resources, users must understand the underlying data schemas even though they often are not content experts. Many other domains share this problem. We developed an interface, TaxonTree, to visualize the taxonomic hierarchy of animal names. We applied integrated searching and browsing so that users need not have complete knowledge either of appropriate keywords or the organization of the data. Our qualitative user study of TaxonTree in an undergraduate course is the first to describe usage patterns in the biodiversity domain. We found that tree-based interaction and visualization aided users ' understanding of the data. Most users approached biodiversity data by browsing, using common, general knowledge rather than the scientific keyword expertise necessary to search using traditional interfaces. Users with different levels of interest in the domain had different interaction preferences. Bongshin Lee, Cynthia Sims Parr, Dana Campbell, Benjamin B. Bederson |
AVI | 3 |
| 2004 | Visualizations for taxonomic and phylogenetic treesabstractAbstract Motivation: Despite substantial efforts to develop and populate the back-ends of biological databases, front-ends to these systems often rely on taxonomic expertise. This research applies techniques from human–computer interaction research to the biodiversity domain. Results: We developed an interactive node-link tool, TaxonTree, illustrating the value of a carefully designed interaction model, animation, and integrated searching and browsing towards retrieval of biological names and other information. Users tested the tool using a new, large integrated dataset of animal names with phylogenetic-based and classification-based tree structures. These techniques also translated well for a tool, DoubleTree, to allow comparison of trees using coupled interaction. Our approaches will be useful not only for biological data but as general portal interfaces. Availability: Working versions of TaxonTree and DoubleTree and video demonstrations of DoubleTree are available at http://www.cs.umd.edu/hcil/biodiversity Supplementary information: All datasets and folk tree illustration are available at http://www.cs.umd.edu/hcil/biodiversity Cynthia Sims Parr, Bongshin Lee, Dana Campbell, Benjamin B. Bederson |
Bioinform. | 3 |