Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Adele Cutler

dblp:32/5051 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Theory of computation · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Data mining · 87% Data integration and cleaning · 13%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Kernel, tree and ensemble methods · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods › ensemble learning › tree ensembles
random forest
0.712023
Geometry- and Accuracy-Preserving Random Forest Proximities · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2023
Data mining › anomaly detection › outlier detection
distance-based outlier detection
0.712023
Geometry- and Accuracy-Preserving Random Forest Proximities · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2023
Data mining › anomaly detection
outlier detection
0.712023
Geometry- and Accuracy-Preserving Random Forest Proximities · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2023
Data integration and cleaning › missing data
missing value imputation
0.212023
Geometry- and Accuracy-Preserving Random Forest Proximities · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

random forest · 1.3out-of-bag estimation · 1.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Geometry- and Accuracy-Preserving Random Forest Proximities
abstract
Random forests are considered one of the best out-of-the-box classification and regression algorithms due to their high level of predictive performance with relatively little tuning. Pairwise proximities can be computed from a trained random forest and measure the similarity between data points relative to the supervised task. Random forest proximities have been used in many applications including the identification of variable importance, data imputation, outlier detection, and data visualization. However, existing definitions of random forest proximities do not accurately reflect the data geometry learned by the random forest. In this paper, we introduce a novel definition of random forest proximities called Random Forest-Geometry- and Accuracy-Preserving proximities (RF-GAP). We prove that the proximity-weighted sum (regression) or majority vote (classification) using RF-GAP exactly matches the out-of-bag random forest prediction, thus capturing the data geometry learned by the random forest. We empirically show that this improved geometric representation outperforms traditional random forest proximities in tasks such as data imputation and provides outlier detection and visualization results consistent with the learned data geometry.
Jake S. Rhodes, Adele Cutler, Kevin R. Moon
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell.2
1994 Accelerations for global optimization covering methods using second derivatives
William Baritompa, Adele Cutler
J. Glob. Optim.2