EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Adele Cutler
dblp:32/5051
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Theory of computation · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Data mining · 87% Data integration and cleaning · 13% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Kernel, tree and ensemble methods · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods › ensemble learning › tree ensembles
random forest |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Geometry- and Accuracy-Preserving Random Forest Proximities · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2023 |
Data mining › anomaly detection › outlier detection
distance-based outlier detection |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Geometry- and Accuracy-Preserving Random Forest Proximities · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2023 |
Data mining › anomaly detection
outlier detection |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Geometry- and Accuracy-Preserving Random Forest Proximities · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2023 |
Data integration and cleaning › missing data
missing value imputation |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Geometry- and Accuracy-Preserving Random Forest Proximities · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
random forest · 1.3out-of-bag estimation · 1.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Geometry- and Accuracy-Preserving Random Forest ProximitiesabstractRandom forests are considered one of the best out-of-the-box classification and regression algorithms due to their high level of predictive performance with relatively little tuning. Pairwise proximities can be computed from a trained random forest and measure the similarity between data points relative to the supervised task. Random forest proximities have been used in many applications including the identification of variable importance, data imputation, outlier detection, and data visualization. However, existing definitions of random forest proximities do not accurately reflect the data geometry learned by the random forest. In this paper, we introduce a novel definition of random forest proximities called Random Forest-Geometry- and Accuracy-Preserving proximities (RF-GAP). We prove that the proximity-weighted sum (regression) or majority vote (classification) using RF-GAP exactly matches the out-of-bag random forest prediction, thus capturing the data geometry learned by the random forest. We empirically show that this improved geometric representation outperforms traditional random forest proximities in tasks such as data imputation and provides outlier detection and visualization results consistent with the learned data geometry. Jake S. Rhodes, Adele Cutler, Kevin R. Moon |
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. | 2 |
| 1994 | Accelerations for global optimization covering methods using second derivatives
William Baritompa, Adele Cutler |
J. Glob. Optim. | 2 |