Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jeremy Frank

dblp:32/67 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
32ranked-venue papers
10as first author
8since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 24 · 7 first-author · 6 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 9 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 6 · 3 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 4 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 3 · 2 first-authorComputer networks · 1Theory of computation · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
9 papers
Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 92% Learning theory · 3% Reinforcement learning · 3%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Quantum computing and quantum information · 100%

Topics — the 20 heaviest of 25, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction
scheduling
0.922025
Analyzing Launch Operations Using the Spaceport Throughput Analysis Resource (STAR) · ICAPS 2025
SOFIA's Choice: An AI Approach to Scheduling Airborne Astronomy Observations · AAAI 2004
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction
constraint programming
0.912025
Analyzing Launch Operations Using the Spaceport Throughput Analysis Resource (STAR) · ICAPS 2025
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction
temporal planning
0.722022
Solving Disjunctive Temporal Networks with Uncertainty under Restricted Time-Based Controllability Using Tree Search and Graph Neural Networks · AAAI 2022
Temporal Planning for Compilation of Quantum Approximate Optimization Circuits · IJCAI 2017
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › constraint satisfaction
constraint relaxation
0.612022
Explaining Soft-Goal Conflicts through Constraint Relaxations · IJCAI 2022
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › temporal planning
dynamic controllability
0.612022
Solving Disjunctive Temporal Networks with Uncertainty under Restricted Time-Based Controllability Using Tree Search and Graph Neural Networks · AAAI 2022
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction
tree search
0.612022
Solving Disjunctive Temporal Networks with Uncertainty under Restricted Time-Based Controllability Using Tree Search and Graph Neural Networks · AAAI 2022
Quantum computing and quantum information
quantum circuit compilation
0.312017
Temporal Planning for Compilation of Quantum Approximate Optimization Circuits · IJCAI 2017
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › goal reasoning
goal decomposition
0.212016
Hierarchical Planning: Relating Task and Goal Decomposition with Task Sharing · IJCAI 2016
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction
hierarchical planning
0.212016
Hierarchical Planning: Relating Task and Goal Decomposition with Task Sharing · IJCAI 2016
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › hierarchical problem solving
task decomposition
0.212016
Hierarchical Planning: Relating Task and Goal Decomposition with Task Sharing · IJCAI 2016
Machine learning › Learning theory
phase transition
0.212014
Parametrized Families of Hard Planning Problems from Phase Transitions · AAAI 2014
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › planning › planning evaluation
planning benchmarks
0.212014
Parametrized Families of Hard Planning Problems from Phase Transitions · AAAI 2014
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › model-based reinforcement learning
model-based planning
0.212013
The challenges of verification and validation of automated planning systems (keynote) · ASE 2013
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › planning
mission planning
0.012013
The challenges of verification and validation of automated planning systems (keynote) · ASE 2013
Optical networks › optical access network
passive optical network
0.011998
Passive optical network architecture based on waveguide grating routing · IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 1998
Routing and switching › traffic engineering
traffic routing
0.011998
Using Collective Intelligence to Route Internet Traffic · NIPS 1998
Optical networks
wavelength-division multiplexing
0.011998
Passive optical network architecture based on waveguide grating routing · IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 1998
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › heuristic search
local search
0.011997
Learning Short-Term Weights for GSAT · IJCAI (1) 1997
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction
satisfiability
0.011997
Learning Short-Term Weights for GSAT · IJCAI (1) 1997
Optical networks › routing and wavelength assignment
lightpath routing
0.011998
Passive optical network architecture based on waveguide grating routing · IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 1998

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

simulation · 1.0rescheduling · 0.9constraint programming · 0.9plan explanation · 0.6graph neural network · 0.6conflict analysis · 0.6temporal planners · 0.3temporal planner · 0.3interactive model development · 0.2reinforcement learning · 0.0performance evaluation · 0.0network design algorithm · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Time-Dependent Orienteering for High Altitude UAVs to Monitor Greenhouse Gases: - Mixed Integer Programming vs. Monte Carlo Tree Search
Richard Levinson, Vinay Ravindra, Jeremy Frank, Meghan Chandarana Saephan
CPAIOR (2)3
2025 Analyzing Launch Operations Using the Spaceport Throughput Analysis Resource (STAR)
abstract
We describe the development of the Spaceport Throughput Analysis Resource (STAR), which evaluates Kennedy Space Center spaceport launch throughput. STAR integrates simulation and limited rescheduling, using a constraint programming model to check constraints and reschedule events. The outputs of STAR are launch delays, and the constraint violations leading to those delays, that can be used to inform infrastructure investments to reduce future delays. At STAR's core is a constraint program representing a limited horizon scheduling problem used to identify resource constraint violations, and revise schedules in the presence of unexpected events that disrupt the launch schedule. We describe the design and implementation of STAR using illustrative examples, and describe performance results on use cases showing how increased launch rates stress KSC infrastructure.
Richard Levinson, Vijayakumar Baskaran, Jeffrey Brink, Jeremy Frank
ICAPS4
2024 An On-Board Off-Board Framework for Online Replanning: Applied to UAVs in Urban Environments
Timothy Darrah, Jeremy Frank, Marcos Quiñones-Grueiro, Gautam Biswas
ICAART (1)2
2024 Science Target Prioritization Framework for Remote Sensing
abstract
Behind the scenes of a remote sensing mission there are complex decision making and planning operations. Streamlining these operations, with a quantitative scientific value framework, aids efficient and optimized science data collection. While there have been previous efforts to quantify the science value for specific science scenarios, our work aims to develop a general framework which can be applied across different scenarios. We describe a pipeline of processes which combines model forecast and observation data, in computational forms, as dictated by the mission objectives set forth by subject matter experts. The framework is described with use cases involving the monitoring of nitrogen dioxide (NO2) concentrations over the Gulf of Mexico and methane concentrations over interior Alaska.
Vinay Ravindra, Douglas Caldwell, Meghan Chandarana Saephan, Bryan Duncan, Sarah Strode, William Swartz, Kristen Manies, Jeremy Frank, Richard Levinson, Eugene Turkov
IGARSS8
2022 Solving Disjunctive Temporal Networks with Uncertainty under Restricted Time-Based Controllability Using Tree Search and Graph Neural Networks
abstract
Scheduling under uncertainty is an area of interest in artificial intelligence. We study the problem of Dynamic Controllability (DC) of Disjunctive Temporal Networks with Uncertainty (DTNU), which seeks a reactive scheduling strategy to satisfy temporal constraints in response to uncontrollable action durations. We introduce new semantics for reactive scheduling: Time-based Dynamic Controllability (TDC) and a restricted subset of TDC, R-TDC. We present a tree search approach to determine whether or not a DTNU is R-TDC. Moreover, we leverage the learning capability of a Graph Neural Network (GNN) as a heuristic for tree search guidance. Finally, we conduct experiments on a known benchmark on which we show R-TDC to retain significant completeness with regard to DC, while being faster to prove. This results in the tree search processing fifty percent more DTNU problems in R-TDC than the state-of-the-art DC solver does in DC with the same time budget. We also observe that GNN tree search guidance leads to substantial performance gains on benchmarks of more complex DTNUs, with up to eleven times more problems solved than the baseline tree search.
Kevin Osanlou, Jeremy Frank, Andrei Bursuc, Tristan Cazenave, Éric Jacopin, Christophe Guettier, J. Benton 0001
AAAI2
2022 Explaining Soft-Goal Conflicts through Constraint Relaxations
abstract
Recent work suggests to explain trade-offs between soft-goals in terms of their conflicts, i.e., minimal unsolvable soft-goal subsets. But this does not explain the conflicts themselves: Why can a given set of soft-goals not be jointly achieved? Here we approach that question in terms of the underlying constraints on plans in the task at hand, namely resource availability and time windows. In this context, a natural form of explanation for a soft-goal conflict is a minimal constraint relaxation under which the conflict disappears (``if the deadline was 1 hour later, it would work''). We explore algorithms for computing such explanations. A baseline is to simply loop over all relaxed tasks and compute the conflicts for each separately. We improve over this by two algorithms that leverage information -- conflicts, reachable states -- across relaxed tasks. We show that these algorithms can exponentially outperform the baseline in theory, and we run experiments confirming that advantage in practice.
Rebecca Eifler, Jeremy Frank, Jörg Hoffmann 0001
IJCAI2
2022 Joint Chance Constrained Probabilistic Simple Temporal Networks via Column Generation (Extended Abstract)
abstract
Probabilistic Simple Temporal Networks (PSTN) are used to represent scheduling problems under uncertainty. In a temporal network that is Strongly Controllable (SC) there exists a concrete schedule that is robust to any uncertainty. We solve the problem of determining Chance Constrained PSTN SC as a Joint Chance Constrained optimisation problem via column generation, lifting the usual assumptions of independence and Boole's inequality typically leveraged in PSTN literature. Our approach offers on average a 10 times reduction in cost versus previous methods.
Andrew Murray, Michael Cashmore, Ashwin Arulselvan, Jeremy Frank
SOCS4
2021 Soil Moisture Monitoring Using Autonomous and Distributed Spacecraft (D-Shield)
abstract
We describe a suite of scalable software methods and frameworks to helps schedule payload operations of a large constellation, with multiple payloads per and across spacecraft, such that the collection of observational data and their downlink, constrained by the constellation constraints (orbital mechanics), resources (e.g., power) and subsystems (e.g., attitude control), results in maximum science value for a selected use case. Constellation topology, spacecraft and ground network characteristics can be imported from design tools or existing constellations and can serve as elements of an operations design tool. Our framework includes a science simulator to inform the scheduler of the predictive value of observations or operational decisions. Autonomous, realtime re-scheduling based on past observations needs improved data assimilation methods within the simulator.
Sreeja Nag, Mahta Moghaddam, Daniel Selva, Jeremy Frank, Vinay Ravindra, Richard Levinson, Amir Azemati, Ben Gorr 0001, Alan Li, Ruzbeh Akbar
IGARSS4
2020 Planning for Compilation of a Quantum Algorithm for Graph Coloring
abstract
The problem of compiling general quantum algorithms for implementation on near-term quantum processors has been introduced to the AI community. Previous work demonstrated that temporal planning is an attractive approach for part of this compilationtask, specifically, the routing of circuits that implement the Quantum Alternating Operator Ansatz (QAOA) applied to the MaxCut problem on a quantum processor architecture. In this paper, we extend the earlier work to route circuits that implement QAOA for Graph Coloring problems. QAOA for coloring requires execution of more, and more complex, operations on the chip, which makes routing a more challenging problem. We evaluate the approach on state-of-the-art hardware architectures from leading quantum computing companies. Additionally, we apply a planning approach to qubit initialization. Our empirical evaluation shows that temporal planning compares well to reasonable analytic upper bounds, and that solving qubit initialization with a classical planner generally helps temporal planners in finding shorter-makespan compilations for QAOA for Graph Coloring. These advances suggest that temporal planning can be an effective approach for more complex quantum computing algorithms and architectures.
Minh Do, Zhihui Wang 0012, Bryan O'Gorman, Davide Venturelli, Eleanor Gilbert Rieffel, Jeremy Frank
ECAI6
2020 D-SHIELD: DISTRIBUTED SPACECRAFT WITH HEURISTIC INTELLIGENCE TO ENABLE LOGISTICAL DECISIONS
abstract
D-SHIELD is a suite of scalable software tools that helps schedule payload operations of a large constellation, with multiple payloads per and across spacecraft, such that the collection of observational data and their downlink, constrained by the constellation constraints (orbital mechanics), resources (e.g., power) and subsystems (e.g., attitude control), results in maximum science value for a selected use case. Constellation topology, spacecraft and ground network characteristics can be imported from design tools or existing constellations and can serve as elements of an operations design tool. D-SHIELD will include a science simulator to inform the scheduler of the predictive value of observations or operational decisions. Autonomous, realtime re-scheduling based on past observations needs improved data assimilation methods within the simulator.
Sreeja Nag, Mahta Moghaddam, Daniel Selva, Jeremy Frank, Vinay Ravindra, Richard Levinson, Amir Azemati, Alan Aguilar, Alan Li, Ruzbeh Akbar
IGARSS4
2017 Temporal Planning for Compilation of Quantum Approximate Optimization Circuits
abstract
We investigate the application of temporal planners to the problem of compiling quantum circuits to emerging quantum hardware. While our approach is general, we focus our initial experiments on Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) circuits that have few ordering constraints and thus allow highly parallel plans. We report on experiments using several temporal planners to compile circuits of various sizes to a realistic hardware architecture. This early empirical evaluation suggests that temporal planning is a viable approach to quantum circuit compilation.
Davide Venturelli, Minh Do, Eleanor Gilbert Rieffel, Jeremy Frank
IJCAI4
2016 Hierarchical Planning: Relating Task and Goal Decomposition with Task Sharing
Ron Alford, Vikas Shivashankar, Mark Roberts, Jeremy Frank, David W. Aha
IJCAI4
2016 A Hybrid Quantum-Classical Approach to Solving Scheduling Problems
abstract
An effective approach to solving complex problems is to decompose them and integrate dedicated solvers for those subproblems. We introduce a hybrid decomposition that incorporates: (1) a quantum annealer that samples from the configuration space of a relaxed problem to obtain strong candidate solutions, and (2) a classical processor that maintains a global search tree and enforces constraints on the relaxed components of the problem. Our framework is the first to use quantum annealing as part of a complete search. We consider variants of our approach with differing amounts of guidance from the quantum annealer. We empirically test our algorithm and compare the variants on problems from three scheduling domains: graph-coloring-type scheduling, simplified Mars Lander task scheduling, and airport runway scheduling. While we were only able to test on problems of small sizes, due to the limitation of currently available quantum annealing hardware, the empirical results show that results obtained from the quantum annealer can be used for more effective search node pruning and to improve node selection heuristics when compared to a standard classical approach.
Tony T. Tran, Minh Do, Eleanor Gilbert Rieffel, Jeremy Frank, Zhihui Wang 0012, Bryan O'Gorman, Davide Venturelli, J. Christopher Beck
SOCS4
2014 Parametrized Families of Hard Planning Problems from Phase Transitions
abstract
There are two complementary ways to evaluate planning algorithms: performance on benchmark problems derived from real applications and analysis of performance on parametrized families of problems with known properties. Prior to this work, few means of generating parametrized families of hard planning problems were known. We generate hard planning problems from the solvable/unsolvable phase transition region of well-studied NP-complete problems that map naturally to navigation and scheduling, aspects common to many planning domains. We observe significant differences between state-of-the-art planners on these problem families, enabling us to gain insight into the relative strengths and weaknesses of these planners. Our results confirm exponential scaling of hardness with problem size, even at very small problem sizes. These families provide complementary test sets exhibiting properties not found in existing benchmarks.
Eleanor Gilbert Rieffel, Davide Venturelli, Minh Do, Itay Hen, Jeremy Frank
AAAI5
2014 Robust Plan Execution in Multi-agent Environments
abstract
This paper presents a novel multi-agent reactive execution model that keeps track of the execution of an agent to recover from incoming failures. It is a domain-independent execution model, which can be exploited in any planning control application, embedded into a more general multi-agent planning framework. The multi-agent reactive execution model provides a mechanism allowing an agent to respond to failures that prevent completion of a task when another agent is not able to repair the failure by itself. The model exploits the reactive planning capabilities of agents to come up with a solution at runtime, thus preventing agents from having to resort to replanning. We show the application of the proposed model for the control of multiple autonomous space vehicles.
Cesar Guzman, Pablo Castejón, Eva Onaindia, Jeremy Frank
ICTAI4
2013 The challenges of verification and validation of automated planning systems (keynote)
abstract
Mission planning is central to space mission operations, and has benefited from advances in model-based planning software. A model is a description of the objects, actions, constraints and preferences that the planner reasons over to generate plans. Developing, verifying and validating a planning model is, however, a difficult task. Mission planning constraints and preferences arise from many sources, including simulators and engineering specification documents. As mission constraints evolve, planning domain modelers must add and update model constraints efficiently using the available source data, catching errors quickly, and correcting the model. The consequences of erroneous models are very high, especially in the space operations environment. We first describe the space operations environment, particularly the role of the mission planning system. We then describe model-based planning, and briefly review the current state of the practice in designing model-based mission planning tools and the challenges facing model developers. We then describe an Interactive Model Development Environment (IMDE) approach to developing mission planning systems. This approach integrates modeling and simulation environments to reduce model editing time, generate simulations automatically to evaluate plans, and identify modeling errors automatically by evaluating simulation output. The IMDE approach was tested on a small subset of the Lunar Atmosphere and Dust Environment Explorer (LADEE) flight software to demonstrate how to develop the LADEE mission planning system.
Jeremy Frank
ASE1
2011 Planning solar array operations on the international space station
abstract
Flight controllers manage the orientation and modes of eight large solar arrays that power the International Space Station (ISS). The task requires generating plans that balance complex constraints and preferences. These considerations include context-dependent constraints on viable solar array configurations, temporal limits on transitions between configurations, and preferences on which considerations have priority. The Solar Array Constraint Engine (SACE) treats this operations planning problem as a sequence of tractable constrained optimization problems. SACE uses constraint management and automated planning capabilities to reason about the constraints, to find optimal array configurations subject to these constraints and solution preferences, and to automatically generate solar array operations plans. SACE further provides flight controllers with real-time situational awareness and what-if analysis capabilities. SACE is built on the Extensible Universal Remote Operations Planning Architecture (EUROPA) model-based planning system. EUROPA facilitated SACE development by providing model-based planning, built-in constraint reasoning capability, and extensibility. This article formulates the planning problem, explains how EUROPA solves the problem, and provides performance statistics from several planning scenarios. SACE reduces a highly manual process that takes weeks to an automated process that takes tens of minutes.
Sudhakar Y. Reddy, Jeremy Frank, Michael Iatauro, Matthew E. Boyce, Elif Kürklü, Mitchell Ai-Chang, Ari K. Jónsson
ACM Trans. Intell. Syst. Technol.2
2007 Using Data Mining to Enhance Automated Planning and Scheduling
abstract
Automated planning is a combinatorial problem that is important to many NASA endeavors, including ground operations and control applications for unmanned and manned space flight. There is significant value to integrating planning and data mining to create better planners. We describe current work in this area, covering uses of data mining to speed up planners, improve the quality of plans returned by planners, and learn domain models for automated planners. The central contribution of this paper is a snap shot of the state of the art in integrating these technologies and a summary of challenges and open research issues
Jeremy Frank
CIDM1
2005 Mixed Discrete and Continuous Algorithms for Scheduling Airborne Astronomy Observations
Jeremy Frank, Elif Kürklü
CPAIOR1
2005 High and dry: trading water vapor, fuel and observing time for airborne infrared astronmomy
abstract
Scheduling astronomy observations for the Strato- spheric Observatory for Infrared Astronomy (SOFIA) requires assessing tradeoffs between the percentage of scheduled obser- vations, the Line Of Sight Water Vapor (LOS-WV) achieved on those observations, and fuel consumption. This trade space is complex, depending on time of year and specific mixes of observations, and cannot be effectively analyzed by hand. We demonstrate the complexity of these tradeoffs and show that an Automated Flight Planner (AFP) is a crucial part of trade space analysis during flight planning. The Stratospheric Observatory for Infrared Astronomy (SOFIA) is NASA's next generation airborne astronomical observatory. The facility consists of a 747-SP modified to accommodate a 2.5 meter telescope. SOFIA is expected to fly an average of 140 science flights per year over its 20 year lifetime, and will commence operations in early 2005. The SOFIA telescope is mounted aft of the wings on the port side of the aircraft and is articulated through a range of 20 ◦ to 60 ◦ of elevation. A significant problem in future SOFIA operations is that of scheduling Facility Instrument (FI) flights in support of the SOFIA General Investigator (GI) program. GIs are expected to propose small numbers of observations, and many observations must be grouped together to make up single flights. Approximately 70 GI flight per year are expected, with 5-15 observations per flight.
Jeremy Frank, Elif Kürklü
IGARSS1
2004 SOFIA's Choice: An AI Approach to Scheduling Airborne Astronomy Observations
Jeremy Frank, Michael A. K. Gross, Elif Kürklü
AAAI1
2004 PLASMA: A Constraint Based Planning Architecture
Andrew Bachmann, Tania Bedrax-Weiss, Jeremy Frank, Michael Iatauro, Conor McGann, Will Taylor
CP3
2004 Bounding the Resource Availability of Partially Ordered Events with Constant Resource Impact
Jeremy Frank
CP1
2003 Scheduling in the Face of Uncertain Resource Consumption and Utility
Jeremy Frank, Richard Dearden
CP1
2000 A Framework for Dynamic Constraint Reasoning using Procedural Constraints
Ari K. Jónsson, Jeremy Frank
ECAI2
1998 Using Collective Intelligence to Route Internet Traffic
David H. Wolpert, Kagan Tumer, Jeremy Frank
NIPS3
1998 Asymptotic and Finite Size Parameters for Phase Transitions: Hamiltonian Circuit as a Case Study
Jeremy Frank, Ian P. Gent, Toby Walsh
Inf. Process. Lett.1
1998 Passive optical network architecture based on waveguide grating routing
abstract
We explore an optical network architecture which employs dense wavelength division multiplexing (WDM) technology and passive waveguide grating routers (WGRs) to establish a virtual topology based on lightpath communication. We examine the motivation and the technical challenges involved in this approach, propose and examine the characteristics of a network design algorithm, and provide some illustrative performance results.
Dhritiman Banerjee, Jeremy Frank, Biswanath Mukherjee
IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun.2
1997 Learning Short-Term Weights for GSAT
Jeremy Frank
IJCAI (1)1
1997 When Gravity Fails: Local Search Topology
abstract
Local search algorithms for combinatorial search problems frequently encounter a sequence of states in which it is impossible to improve the value of the objective function; moves through these regions, called plateau moves, dominate the time spent in local search. We analyze and characterize plateaus for three different classes of randomly generated Boolean Satisfiability problems. We identify several interesting features of plateaus that impact the performance of local search algorithms. We show that local minima tend to be small but occasionally may be very large. We also show that local minima can be escaped without unsatisfying a large number of clauses, but that systematically searching for an escape route may be computationally expensive if the local minimum is large. We show that plateaus with exits, called benches, tend to be much larger than minima, and that some benches have very few exit states which local search can use to escape. We show that the solutions (i.e., global minima) of randomly generated problem instances form clusters, which behave similarly to local minima. We revisit several enhancements of local search algorithms and explain their performance in light of our results. Finally we discuss strategies for creating the next generation of local search algorithms.
Jeremy Frank, Peter C. Cheeseman, John C. Stutz
J. Artif. Intell. Res.1
1996 Constraint Satisfaction in Optical Routing for Passive Wavelength-Routed Networks
Dhritiman Banerjee, Jeremy Frank
CP2
1996 Local Search and the Number of Solutions
David A. Clark, Jeremy Frank, Ian P. Gent, Ewan MacIntyre, Neven Tomov, Toby Walsh
CP2