EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Andreas Opelt
dblp:32/6986
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
6as first author
0since 2021 · last 2008
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 6 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 4 · 4 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
5 papers |
Image recognition and object detection · 97% Learning paradigms · 3% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Geometric modeling and processing · 100% |
Topics — the 8 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
object detection |
0.3 | 4 | 2008 | Learning an Alphabet of Shape and Appearance for Multi-Class Object Detection · Int. J. Comput. Vis. 2008 A Boundary-Fragment-Model for Object Detection · ECCV (2) 2006 Incremental learning of object detectors using a visual shape alphabet · CVPR (1) 2006 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › object detection
multi-class object detection |
0.1 | 2 | 2008 | Learning an Alphabet of Shape and Appearance for Multi-Class Object Detection · Int. J. Comput. Vis. 2008 Incremental learning of object detectors using a visual shape alphabet · CVPR (1) 2006 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
object recognition |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | Generic Object Recognition with Boosting · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2006 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › object recognition
weakly supervised object recognition |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | Generic Object Recognition with Boosting · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2006 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › image classification
object classification |
0.0 | 1 | 2008 | Learning an Alphabet of Shape and Appearance for Multi-Class Object Detection · Int. J. Comput. Vis. 2008 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
incremental learning |
0.0 | 1 | 2006 | Incremental learning of object detectors using a visual shape alphabet · CVPR (1) 2006 |
Geometric modeling and processing
shape representation |
0.0 | 1 | 2006 | A Boundary-Fragment-Model for Object Detection · ECCV (2) 2006 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › object detection
boosting-based detection |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | Weak Hypotheses and Boosting for Generic Object Detection and Recognition · ECCV (2) 2004 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
boosting · 0.2boundary-fragment model · 0.1visual alphabet representation · 0.1shape features · 0.1local feature descriptor · 0.1feature selection · 0.1adaboost · 0.1weak hypotheses · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | Learning an Alphabet of Shape and Appearance for Multi-Class Object DetectionabstractWe present a novel algorithmic approach to object categorization and detection that can learn category specific detectors, using Boosting, from a visual alphabet of shape and appearance. The alphabet itself is learnt incrementally during this process. The resulting representation consists of a set of category-specific descriptors—basic shape features are represented by boundary-fragments, and appearance is represented by patches—where each descriptor in combination with centroid vectors for possible object centroids (geometry) forms an alphabet entry. Our experimental results highlight several qualities of this novel representation. First, we demonstrate the power of purely shape-based representation with excellent categorization and detection results using a Boundary-Fragment-Model (BFM), and investigate the capabilities of such a model to handle changes in scale and viewpoint, as well as intra- and inter-class variability. Second, we show that incremental learning of a BFM for many categories leads to a sub-linear growth of visual alphabet entries by sharing of shape features, while this generalization over categories at the same time often improves categorization performance (over independently learning the categories). Finally, the combination of basic shape and appearance (boundary-fragments and patches) features can further improve results. Certain feature types are preferred by certain categories, and for some categories we achieve the lowest error rates that have been reported so far. Andreas Opelt, Axel Pinz, Andrew Zisserman |
Int. J. Comput. Vis. | 1 |
| 2006 | Fusing Shape and Appearance Information for Object Category DetectionabstractWe present methods for recognizing object categories which are able to combine various feature types (e.g. image patches and edge boundaries). Our objective is to detect object instances in an image, as opposed to the easier task of image categorization. To this end, we investigate two algorithms for learning and detecting object categories which both benefit from combining features. The first uses a naive combination method for detectors each employing only one type of feature, the second learns the best features (from a pool of patches and boundaries). In experiments we achieve comparable results to the state of the art over a number of datasets, and for some categories we even achieve the lowest errors that have been reported so far. The results also show that certain object categories prefer certain feature types (e.g. boundary fragments for airplanes). Andreas Opelt, Andrew Zisserman, Axel Pinz |
BMVC | 1 |
| 2006 | Incremental learning of object detectors using a visual shape alphabetabstractWe address the problem of multiclass object detection. Our aims are to enable models for new categories to benefit from the detectors built previously for other categories, and for the complexity of the multiclass system to grow sublinearly with the number of categories. To this end we introduce a visual alphabet representation which can be learnt incrementally, and explicitly shares boundary fragments (contours) and spatial configurations (relation to centroid) across object categories. We develop a learning algorithm with the following novel contributions: (i) AdaBoost is adapted to learn jointly, based on shape features; (ii) a new learning schedule enables incremental additions of new categories; and (iii) the algorithm learns to detect objects (instead of categorizing images). Furthermore, we show that category similarities can be predicted from the alphabet. We obtain excellent experimental results on a variety of complex categories over several visual aspects. We show that the sharing of shape features not only reduces the number of features required per category, but also often improves recognition performance, as compared to individual detectors which are trained on a per-class basis. Andreas Opelt, Axel Pinz, Andrew Zisserman |
CVPR (1) | 1 |
| 2006 | A Boundary-Fragment-Model for Object Detection
Andreas Opelt, Axel Pinz, Andrew Zisserman |
ECCV (2) | 1 |
| 2006 | Generic Object Recognition with BoostingabstractThis paper explores the power and the limitations of weakly supervised categorization. We present a complete framework that starts with the extraction of various local regions of either discontinuity or homogeneity. A variety of local descriptors can be applied to form a set of feature vectors for each local region. Boosting is used to learn a subset of such feature vectors (weak hypotheses) and to combine them into one final hypothesis for each visual category. This combination of individual extractors and descriptors leads to recognition rates that are superior to other approaches which use only one specific extractor/descriptor setting. To explore the limitation of our system, we had to set up new, highly complex image databases that show the objects of interest at varying scales and poses, in cluttered background, and under considerable occlusion. We obtain classification results up to 81 percent ROC-equal error rate on the most complex of our databases. Our approach outperforms all comparable solutions on common databases. Andreas Opelt, Axel Pinz, Michael Fussenegger, Peter Auer |
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. | 1 |
| 2004 | Weak Hypotheses and Boosting for Generic Object Detection and Recognition
Andreas Opelt, Michael Fussenegger, Axel Pinz, Peter Auer |
ECCV (2) | 1 |