Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Claudia de O. Melo
dblp:32/9660 · also Claudia de Oliveira Melo
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0002-8082-8048ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 3 · 2 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Empirical software engineering · 62% Software maintenance and evolution · 38% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Empirical software engineering
developer studies |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | A Theory of Organizational Structures for Development and Infrastructure Professionals · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2023 |
Software maintenance and evolution
software ecosystems |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | A Theory of Organizational Structures for Development and Infrastructure Professionals · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2023 |
Empirical software engineering › qualitative research
grounded theory |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | A Theory of Organizational Structures for Development and Infrastructure Professionals · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2023 |
Empirical software engineering
qualitative research |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | A Theory of Organizational Structures for Development and Infrastructure Professionals · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
semi-structured interviews · 0.7grounded theory · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | A Theory of Organizational Structures for Development and Infrastructure ProfessionalsabstractDevOps and continuous delivery have impacted the organizational structures of development and infrastructure groups in software-producing organizations. Our research aims at revealing the different options adopted by the software industry to organize such groups, understanding why different organizations adopt distinct structures, and discovering how organizations handle the drawbacks of each structure. We interviewed 68 carefully-selected IT professionals, 45 working in Brazil, 10 in the USA, 8 in Europe, 1 in Canada, and 4 in globally distributed teams. By analyzing these conversations through a Grounded Theory process, we identified conditions, causes, reasons to avoid, consequences, and contingencies related to each discovered structure (segregated departments, collaborative departments, API-mediated departments, and single department). In this way, we offer a theory to explain organizational structures for development and infrastructure professionals. This theory can support practitioners and researchers in comprehending and discussing the DevOps phenomenon and its related issues, and also provides valuable input to practitioners’ decision-making. Leonardo A. F. Leite, Nelson Lago, Claudia de O. Melo, Fabio Kon, Paulo Meirelles |
IEEE Trans. Software Eng. | 3 |
| 2013 | Interpretative case studies on agile team productivity and management
Claudia de O. Melo, Daniela S. Cruzes, Fabio Kon, Reidar Conradi |
Inf. Softw. Technol. | 1 |
| 2011 | Empirical Evaluation of Agile Practices Impact on Team Productivity
Claudia de O. Melo, Fabio Kon |
XP | 1 |