Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Claudia de O. Melo

dblp:32/9660 · also Claudia de Oliveira Melo · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0002-8082-8048ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 3 · 2 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Empirical software engineering · 62% Software maintenance and evolution · 38%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Empirical software engineering
developer studies
0.712023
A Theory of Organizational Structures for Development and Infrastructure Professionals · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2023
Software maintenance and evolution
software ecosystems
0.712023
A Theory of Organizational Structures for Development and Infrastructure Professionals · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2023
Empirical software engineering › qualitative research
grounded theory
0.212023
A Theory of Organizational Structures for Development and Infrastructure Professionals · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2023
Empirical software engineering
qualitative research
0.212023
A Theory of Organizational Structures for Development and Infrastructure Professionals · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

semi-structured interviews · 0.7grounded theory · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 A Theory of Organizational Structures for Development and Infrastructure Professionals
abstract
DevOps and continuous delivery have impacted the organizational structures of development and infrastructure groups in software-producing organizations. Our research aims at revealing the different options adopted by the software industry to organize such groups, understanding why different organizations adopt distinct structures, and discovering how organizations handle the drawbacks of each structure. We interviewed 68 carefully-selected IT professionals, 45 working in Brazil, 10 in the USA, 8 in Europe, 1 in Canada, and 4 in globally distributed teams. By analyzing these conversations through a Grounded Theory process, we identified conditions, causes, reasons to avoid, consequences, and contingencies related to each discovered structure (segregated departments, collaborative departments, API-mediated departments, and single department). In this way, we offer a theory to explain organizational structures for development and infrastructure professionals. This theory can support practitioners and researchers in comprehending and discussing the DevOps phenomenon and its related issues, and also provides valuable input to practitioners’ decision-making.
Leonardo A. F. Leite, Nelson Lago, Claudia de O. Melo, Fabio Kon, Paulo Meirelles
IEEE Trans. Software Eng.3
2013 Interpretative case studies on agile team productivity and management
Claudia de O. Melo, Daniela S. Cruzes, Fabio Kon, Reidar Conradi
Inf. Softw. Technol.1
2011 Empirical Evaluation of Agile Practices Impact on Team Productivity
Claudia de O. Melo, Fabio Kon
XP1