Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Han Schaminée

dblp:32/9832 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Empirical software engineering · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Empirical software engineering
developer studies
0.112021
Managers hate uncertainty: good and bad experiences with adaptive project management (invited talk) · ESEC/SIGSOFT FSE 2021
Empirical software engineering
software project management
0.112021
Managers hate uncertainty: good and bad experiences with adaptive project management (invited talk) · ESEC/SIGSOFT FSE 2021
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2021 Managers hate uncertainty: good and bad experiences with adaptive project management (invited talk)
abstract
There is intrinsic uncertainty in product development. Uncertainty is often confused with risk, where unknowns can be identified in advance. Traditional predictive project management methods are based on risk management and it will be explained why these methods often are less effective in domains with higher uncertainty. Adaptive methods seem to be more effective, as they better deal with that uncertainty. Examples will be given where adaptive methods have led to higher predictability. But many managers still often believe predictive methods lead to higher predictability. We will formulate some hypotheses on why managers still prefer predictive methods, based on own experience and initial research. Further research is required to validate these hypotheses.
Han Schaminée
ESEC/SIGSOFT FSE1