EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Santhini K. A.
dblp:320/0168
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0003-1605-1841ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design
matching |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Matchings under One-Sided Preferences with Soft Quotas · IJCAI 2023 |
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design › matching
matching under preferences |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Matchings under One-Sided Preferences with Soft Quotas · IJCAI 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
flow networks · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Optimal matchings with one-sided preferences: fixed and cost-based quotas
Santhini K. A., Govind S. Sankar, Meghana Nasre |
Auton. Agents Multi Agent Syst. | 1 |
| 2023 | Matchings under One-Sided Preferences with Soft QuotasabstractAssigning applicants to posts in the presence of the preferences of applicants and quotas associated with posts is extensively investigated. For a post, lower quota guarantees, and upper quota limits the number of applicants assigned to it. Typically, quotas are assumed to be fixed, which need not be the case in practice. We address this by introducing a soft quota setting, in which every post is associated with two values – lower target and upper target which together denote a range for the intended number of applicants in any assignment. Unlike the fixed quota setting, we allow the number of applicants assigned to a post to fall outside the range. This leads to assignments with deviation. Here, we study the problem of computing an assignment that has two orthogonal optimization objectives – minimizing the deviation (maximum or total) w.r.t. soft quotas and ensuring optimality w.r.t. preferences of applicants (rank-maximality or fairness). The order in which these objectives are considered, the different possibilities to optimize deviation combined with the well-studied notions of optimality w.r.t. preferences open up a range of optimization problems of practical importance. We present efficient algorithms based on flow-networks to solve these optimization problems. Santhini K. A., Raghu Raman Ravi, Meghana Nasre |
IJCAI | 1 |