Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Depanshu Sani

dblp:320/0200 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
4as first author
5since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 5 · 4 first-author · 5 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 3 first-author · 4 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Face, body and person analysis · 49% Image recognition and object detection · 19% Graph learning · 12%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › Face, body and person analysis › re-identification
animal re-identification
2.022026
Active Learning for Animal Re-Identification with Ambiguity-Aware Sampling · AAAI 2026
Exploiting Graph-Based Structural Priors for Visual Recognition · AAAI 2026
Computer vision › Face, body and person analysis
re-identification
2.022026
Active Learning for Animal Re-Identification with Ambiguity-Aware Sampling · AAAI 2026
Exploiting Graph-Based Structural Priors for Visual Recognition · AAAI 2026
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
active learning
1.012026
Active Learning for Animal Re-Identification with Ambiguity-Aware Sampling · AAAI 2026
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
visual recognition
1.012026
Exploiting Graph-Based Structural Priors for Visual Recognition · AAAI 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

rank-order metric · 1.0must-link and cannot-link constraints · 1.0inductive bias · 1.0graph-based structural priors · 1.0foundation model · 1.0constrained clustering refinement · 1.0metric learning · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Exploiting Graph-Based Structural Priors for Visual Recognition
abstract
Nature is inherently structured! The entities in the real world are naturally organized in rich relationships. For example, dolphins and sharks, despite their striking visual resemblance in body shape and fins, are actually from entirely different branches of the animal hierarchy, i.e., mammals and fishes, respectively. This remarkable similarity is a prime example of ‘convergent evolution’, where unrelated species develop similar features because they face similar environmental challenges. This illustrates how nature’s underlying organization often transcends superficial visual resemblances. Although humans intuitively grasp and utilize these profound natural constraints, they are typically underutilized in most AI systems. As a result, trained AI models tend to align with statistical patterns in the data, such as sampling biases or class imbalance, rather than adhering to the underlying relational consistency. This thesis argues that AI systems must evolve beyond learning “flat” feature representations, which are domain-agnostic and derived purely from data correlations, to “explicitly model the domain-specific structural relationships”. A key benefit of encoding relational priors in the learning process is that it can inject domain knowledge as an inductive bias, leading to more robust and reliable models. My research investigates incorporating domain knowledge by leveraging “graph-based structural priors” that explicitly model relational constraints in various visual recognition tasks. This work spans three distinct dimensions of visual recognition, progressing from coarse-level (image-level) to fine-grained (scene-level) understanding. My research highlights a crucial limitation in existing AI models: they often fail to incorporate real-world constraints, leading to significant errors. I show that even powerful, pre-trained neural networks can make severe mistakes due to a lack of domain knowledge. I argue that standard metrics like top-1 accuracy, precision, and recall are insufficient for evaluating model robustness, and propose a new metric based on rank order of the predictions as a better indicator of reliability. The benchmark on various large-scale datasets confirms that existing solutions do not sufficiently capture the domain knowledge, which is often available as a taxonomy tree, motivating our design of better learning frameworks. I also examine complex visual re-identification (Re-ID) tasks, such as monitoring animals in the wild. I find that existing foundational models struggle with new species and environments. This challenge is compounded by the high cost of manual annotation for adapting these systems to new settings. While existing unsupervised learning methods can help reduce the need for extensive labeling, they often suffer from under- and over-segmentation errors, which led me to develop more effective active learning strategies. Finally, I address the limitations of the classic Kalman filter, a widely used tool for dynamic systems. I point out that this filter makes a flawed assumption that the movement of each individual object is independent of its dynamic surroundings. In the real world, this is rarely the case. I demonstrate the need for a new filtering mechanism that not only considers an object’s past movements but also its spatial relationship with other dynamic entities in its environment. In my analysis, I observed the vision foundation models for all recognition tasks, i.e., classification, detection, and segmentation, lack the domain knowledge. I believe that our learning framework, which was designed specifically for classification, can be adapted for other recognition tasks. I speculate that a unified learning framework can be designed that can be leveraged for making vision foundation models aware of the available taxonomy.
Depanshu Sani
AAAI1
2026 Active Learning for Animal Re-Identification with Ambiguity-Aware Sampling
abstract
Animal re-identification (Re-ID) has recently gained substantial attention in the AI research community due to its high impact on biodiversity monitoring and unique research challenges arising from environmental factors. The subtle distinguishing patterns like stripes or spots, handling new species and the inherent open-set nature make the problem even harder. To address these complexities, foundation models trained on labeled, large-scale and multi-species animal Re-ID datasets have recently been introduced to enable zero-shot Re-ID. However, our benchmarking reveals significant gaps in their zero-shot Re-ID performance for both known and unknown species. While this highlights the need for collecting labeled data in new domains, exhaustive annotation for Re-ID is laborious and requires domain expertise. Our analyses also show that existing unsupervised (USL) and active learning (AL) Re-ID methods underperform for animal Re-ID. To address these limitations, we introduce a novel AL Re-ID framework that leverages complementary clustering methods to uncover and target structurally ambiguous regions in the embedding space for mining pairs of samples that are both informative and broadly representative. Oracle feedback on these pairs, in the form of must-link and cannot-link constraints, facilitates a simple annotation interface, which naturally integrates with existing USL methods through our proposed constrained clustering refinement algorithm. Through extensive experiments, we demonstrate that, by utilizing only 0.033% of all possible annotations, our approach consistently outperforms existing foundational, USL and AL baselines. Specifically, we report an average improvement of 10.49%, 11.19% and 3.99% (mAP) on 13 wildlife datasets over foundational, USL and AL methods, respectively, while attaining state-of-the-art performance on each dataset. Furthermore, we also show an improvement of 11.09%, 8.2% and 2.06% (AUC ROC) for unknown individuals in an open-world setting. We also present results on 2 publicly available person Re-ID datasets, showing average gains of 7.96% and 2.86% (mAP) over existing USL and AL Re-ID methods.
Depanshu Sani, Mehar Khurana, Saket Anand
AAAI1
2024 Sensor-Agnostic Graph-Aware Kalman Filter for Multi-Modal Multi-Object Tracking
Depanshu Sani, Anirudh Iyer, Prakhar Rai, Saket Anand, Anuj Srivastava, Kaushik Kalyanaraman
ICPR (16)1
2024 SICKLE: A Multi-Sensor Satellite Imagery Dataset Annotated with Multiple Key Cropping Parameters
abstract
The availability of well-curated datasets has driven the success of Machine Learning (ML) models. Despite greater access to earth observation data in agriculture, there is a scarcity of curated and labelled datasets, which limits the potential of its use in training ML models for remote sensing (RS) in agriculture. To this end, we introduce a first-of-its-kind dataset called SICKLE, which constitutes a time-series of multi-resolution imagery from 3 distinct satellites: Landsat-8, Sentinel-1 and Sentinel-2. Our dataset constitutes multi-spectral, thermal and microwave sensors during January 2018 - March 2021 period. We construct each temporal sequence by considering the cropping practices followed by farmers primarily engaged in paddy cultivation in the Cauvery Delta region of Tamil Nadu, India; and annotate the corresponding imagery with key cropping parameters at multiple resolutions (i.e. 3m, 10m and 30m). Our dataset comprises 2, 370 season-wise samples from 388 unique plots, having an average size of 0.38 acres, for classifying 21 crop types across 4 districts in the Delta, which amounts to approximately 209,000 satellite images. Out of the 2,370 samples, 351 paddy samples from 145 plots are annotated with multiple crop parameters; such as the variety of paddy, its growing season and productivity in terms of per-acre yields. Ours is also one among the first studies that consider the growing season activities pertinent to crop phenology (spans sowing, transplanting and harvesting dates) as parameters of interest. We benchmark SICKLE on three tasks: crop type, crop phenology (sowing, transplanting, harvesting), and yield prediction.
Depanshu Sani, Sandeep Mahato, Sourabh Saini, Harsh Kumar Agarwal, Charu Chandra Devshali, Saket Anand, Gaurav Arora, Thiagarajan Jayaraman
WACV1
2022 Learning Hierarchy Aware Features for Reducing Mistake Severity
Ashima Garg, Depanshu Sani, Saket Anand
ECCV (24)2