Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Xiao Sui 0001
dblp:320/2137-1
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-4889-6737ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers |
Distributed systems · 100% | |
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation · 100% |
Topics — the 8 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Distributed systems › consensus
byzantine agreement |
1.7 | 2 | 2025 | Practical Signature-Free Multivalued Validated Byzantine Agreement and Asynchronous Common Subset in Constant Time · IEEE Trans. Computers 2025 Pike: Two-Phase BFT With Linearity and Flexible View Change · IEEE Trans. Computers 2025 |
Distributed systems
consensus |
1.7 | 2 | 2025 | Practical Signature-Free Multivalued Validated Byzantine Agreement and Asynchronous Common Subset in Constant Time · IEEE Trans. Computers 2025 Pike: Two-Phase BFT With Linearity and Flexible View Change · IEEE Trans. Computers 2025 |
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation
secure multiparty computation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Practical Signature-Free Multivalued Validated Byzantine Agreement and Asynchronous Common Subset in Constant Time · IEEE Trans. Computers 2025 |
Distributed systems › consensus
asynchronous common subset |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Practical Signature-Free Multivalued Validated Byzantine Agreement and Asynchronous Common Subset in Constant Time · IEEE Trans. Computers 2025 |
Distributed systems › fault tolerance
byzantine fault tolerance |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Pike: Two-Phase BFT With Linearity and Flexible View Change · IEEE Trans. Computers 2025 |
Distributed systems
fault tolerance |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Practical Signature-Free Multivalued Validated Byzantine Agreement and Asynchronous Common Subset in Constant Time · IEEE Trans. Computers 2025 |
Distributed systems › fault tolerance › byzantine fault tolerance
view change |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Pike: Two-Phase BFT With Linearity and Flexible View Change · IEEE Trans. Computers 2025 |
Distributed systems
communication complexity |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Pike: Two-Phase BFT With Linearity and Flexible View Change · IEEE Trans. Computers 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
validated byzantine agreement · 1.7asynchronous common subset · 1.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Pike: Two-Phase BFT With Linearity and Flexible View ChangeabstractAs the first Byzantine fault-tolerant (BFT) protocol with linear communication complexity, HotStuff (PODC 2019) has received significant attention. HotStuff has three round-trips for both normal case operations and view change protocols. Follow-up studies attempt to reduce the number of phases for HotStuff. However, most studies give up on one thing in return for another. This paper extends our previous work Marlin (DSN 2022) to Pike, another BFT protocol with two phases and linear communication complexity. Both Pike and Marlin use the same cryptographic tools as in HotStuff and introduce no additional assumptions. Marlin has a more efficient view change (i.e., leader election) protocol but a more complicated data structure. Pike further simplifies the data structure at the cost of longer view changes in extreme cases. We implement the Pike, Marlin, HotStuff, and HotStuff-2, showing that both Pike and Marlin outperform HotStuff in normal case operations. Xiao Sui 0001, Qichang Liu, Sisi Duan |
IEEE Trans. Computers | 1 |
| 2025 | Practical Signature-Free Multivalued Validated Byzantine Agreement and Asynchronous Common Subset in Constant TimeabstractAsynchronous common subset (ACS) is a powerful paradigm enabling applications such as Byzantine fault-tolerance (BFT) and multi-party computation (MPC). The most efficient ACS framework in the information-theoretic setting is due to Ben-Or, Kelmer, and Rabin (BKR, 1994). The BKR ACS protocol has been both theoretically and practically impactful. BKR ACS has an$O(\log n)$running time (where$n$is the number of replicas) due to the usage of$n$parallel asynchronous binary agreement (ABA) instances, impacting both performance and scalability. Indeed, for a network of 16$\sim$64 replicas, the parallel ABA phase occupies about 95%$\sim$97% of the total runtime. A long-standing open problem is whether we can build an ACS framework with$O(1)$time while not increasing the message or communication complexity of the BKR protocol. We resolve the open problem, presenting the first constant-time ACS protocol with$O(n^{3})$messages in the information-theoretic and signature-free settings. Our key ingredient is the first information-theoretic and constant-time multivalued validated Byzantine agreement (MVBA) protocol. Our results can improve—asymptotically and concretely—various applications using ACS and MVBA. As an example, we implement FIN, a BFT protocol instantiated using our framework. Via a 121-server deployment on Amazon EC2, we show FIN reduces the overhead of the ABA phase to as low as 1.23% of the total runtime. Xin Wang 0122, Xiao Sui 0001, Sisi Duan |
IEEE Trans. Computers | 2 |