Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Keitaro Sakamoto

dblp:320/3711 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Learning theory · 48% Deep learning architectures and training · 29% Efficient and distributed learning · 24%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Learning theory
generalization bounds
1.422025
Benign Overfitting in Token Selection of Attention Mechanism · ICML 2025
Analyzing Lottery Ticket Hypothesis from PAC-Bayesian Theory Perspective · NeurIPS 2022
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
attention mechanism
0.912025
Benign Overfitting in Token Selection of Attention Mechanism · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Learning theory › overfitting
benign overfitting
0.912025
Benign Overfitting in Token Selection of Attention Mechanism · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › token reduction
token selection
0.912025
Benign Overfitting in Token Selection of Attention Mechanism · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
transformer
0.912025
Benign Overfitting in Token Selection of Attention Mechanism · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Learning theory
PAC-Bayesian analysis
0.612022
Analyzing Lottery Ticket Hypothesis from PAC-Bayesian Theory Perspective · NeurIPS 2022
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression
pruning
0.612022
Analyzing Lottery Ticket Hypothesis from PAC-Bayesian Theory Perspective · NeurIPS 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

training dynamics analysis · 0.9signal-to-noise ratio analysis · 0.9spike-and-slab distribution · 0.6iterative magnitude pruning · 0.6PAC-Bayes bounds · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Benign Overfitting in Token Selection of Attention Mechanism
abstract
Attention mechanism is a fundamental component of the transformer model and plays a significant role in its success. However, the theoretical understanding of how attention learns to select tokens is still an emerging area of research. In this work, we study the training dynamics and generalization ability of the attention mechanism, under classification problems with label noise. We show that, with the characterization of signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), the token selection of attention mechanism achieves “benign overfitting”, i.e., maintaining high generalization performance despite fitting label noise. Our work also demonstrates an interesting delayed acquisition of generalization after an initial phase of overfitting. Finally, we provide experiments to support our theoretical analysis using both synthetic and real-world datasets.
Keitaro Sakamoto, Issei Sato
ICML1
2022 Analyzing Lottery Ticket Hypothesis from PAC-Bayesian Theory Perspective
abstract
The lottery ticket hypothesis (LTH) has attracted attention because it can explain why over-parameterized models often show high generalization ability. It is known that when we use iterative magnitude pruning (IMP), which is an algorithm to find sparse networks with high generalization ability that can be trained from the initial weights independently, called winning tickets, the initial large learning rate does not work well in deep neural networks such as ResNet. However, since the initial large learning rate generally helps the optimizer to converge to flatter minima, we hypothesize that the winning tickets have relatively sharp minima, which is considered a disadvantage in terms of generalization ability. In this paper, we confirm this hypothesis and show that the PAC-Bayesian theory can provide an explicit understanding of the relationship between LTH and generalization behavior. On the basis of our experimental findings that IMP with a small learning rate finds relatively sharp minima and that the distance from the initial weights is deeply involved in winning tickets, we offer the PAC-Bayes bound using a spike-and-slab distribution to analyze winning tickets. Finally, we revisit existing algorithms for finding winning tickets from a PAC-Bayesian perspective and provide new insights into these methods.
Keitaro Sakamoto, Issei Sato
NeurIPS1