EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Nashlen Govindasamy
dblp:320/4058
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0002-7191-9829ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Theory of computation · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
2 papers |
Computational complexity · 100% |
Topics — the 9 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computational complexity › proof complexity
algebraic proof systems |
1.6 | 2 | 2026 | Lower Bounds against the Ideal Proof System in Finite Fields · STOC 2026 Simple Hard Instances for Low-Depth Algebraic Proofs · FOCS 2022 |
Computational complexity › proof complexity › algebraic proof systems
ideal proof system |
1.6 | 2 | 2026 | Lower Bounds against the Ideal Proof System in Finite Fields · STOC 2026 Simple Hard Instances for Low-Depth Algebraic Proofs · FOCS 2022 |
Computational complexity
proof complexity |
1.6 | 2 | 2026 | Lower Bounds against the Ideal Proof System in Finite Fields · STOC 2026 Simple Hard Instances for Low-Depth Algebraic Proofs · FOCS 2022 |
Computational complexity
lower bounds |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Lower Bounds against the Ideal Proof System in Finite Fields · STOC 2026 |
Computational complexity › circuit complexity
circuit lower bounds |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Simple Hard Instances for Low-Depth Algebraic Proofs · FOCS 2022 |
Computational complexity › algebraic complexity › arithmetic circuit complexity
constant-depth arithmetic circuits |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Simple Hard Instances for Low-Depth Algebraic Proofs · FOCS 2022 |
Computational complexity
circuit complexity |
0.3 | 1 | 2026 | Lower Bounds against the Ideal Proof System in Finite Fields · STOC 2026 |
Computational complexity › circuit complexity
w[p] |
0.3 | 1 | 2026 | Lower Bounds against the Ideal Proof System in Finite Fields · STOC 2026 |
Computational complexity › lower bounds
functional lower bounds |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Simple Hard Instances for Low-Depth Algebraic Proofs · FOCS 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
finite field arithmetic · 1.0algebraic complexity · 1.0set-multilinear projection · 0.6multilinear projection · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Lower Bounds against the Ideal Proof System in Finite FieldsabstractLower bounds against strong algebraic proof systems, and specifically fragments of the Ideal Proof System (IPS), have been obtained in an ongoing line of work. With the exception of the placeholder model, where the instance itself lacks small circuits, all existing bounds are proved only over large (or characteristic 0) fields, whereas finite fields form the more natural setting for propositional proof complexity. This work establishes lower bounds against fragments of IPS over constant-sized finite fields, resolving an open problem left by a series of prior works beginning with Forbes, Shpilka, Tzameret, and Wigderson (Theor. of Comput.’21), persisting with Behera, Limaye, Ramanathan, and Srinivasan (ICALP’25), and most recently posed by Forbes (CCC’24). We further highlight the importance of the constant-sized finite field regime in IPS by showing that any hard instance in this regime for a sufficiently strong proof system translates into a hard instance against AC0[p]-Frege, whose lower bounds remain a longstanding open problem. Tal Elbaz, Nashlen Govindasamy, Jiaqi Lu 0007, Iddo Tzameret |
STOC | 2 |
| 2022 | Simple Hard Instances for Low-Depth Algebraic ProofsabstractWe prove super-polynomial lower bounds on the size of propositional proof systems operating with constant-depth algebraic circuits over fields of zero characteristic. Specifically, we show that the subset-sum variant $\displaystyle \sum_{i,j,k,\ell\in[n]}Z_{i_{J}^{\prime}k}\ell x_{i}x_{j}x_{k}x_{\ell}-\beta=0$, for Boolean variables, does not have polynomial-size IPS refutations where the refutations are multilinear and written as constant-depth circuits. Andrews and Forbes (STOC’22) established recently a constant-depth IPS lower bound, but their hard instance does not have itself small constant-depth circuits, while our instance is computable already with small depth-2 circuits. Our argument relies on extending the recent breakthrough lower bounds against constant-depth algebraic circuits by Limaye, Srinivasan and Tavenas (FOCS’21) to the functional lower bound framework of Forbes, Shpilka, Tzameret and Wigderson (ToC’21), and may be of independent interest. Specifically, we construct a polynomial f computable with small-size constant-depth circuits, such that the multilinear polynomial computing $1/f$ over Boolean values and its appropriate set-multilinear projection are hard for constant-depth circuits. Nashlen Govindasamy, Tuomas Hakoniemi, Iddo Tzameret |
FOCS | 1 |