Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Ridi Wen
dblp:320/5068
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
0as first author
5since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0002-8851-9725ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Computer networks · 3 · 3 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer networks
1 paper |
Network management and operations · 87% Software-defined and programmable networks · 13% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Cloud and datacenter computing · 50% Storage systems · 50% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Network management and operations › network verification
data plane verification |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Beyond a Centralized Verifier: Scaling Data Plane Checking via Distributed, On-Device Verification · SIGCOMM 2023 |
Network management and operations
network verification |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Beyond a Centralized Verifier: Scaling Data Plane Checking via Distributed, On-Device Verification · SIGCOMM 2023 |
Cloud and datacenter computing
cloud storage |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | More Than Capacity: Performance-oriented Evolution of Pangu in Alibaba · FAST 2023 |
Storage systems
distributed storage |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | More Than Capacity: Performance-oriented Evolution of Pangu in Alibaba · FAST 2023 |
Software-defined and programmable networks
programmable data plane |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Beyond a Centralized Verifier: Scaling Data Plane Checking via Distributed, On-Device Verification · SIGCOMM 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
distributed verification · 0.7counting on DAG · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | PocketStruct: Integrating Protein Pocket Structural Features for Protein-Peptide Binding PredictionabstractPeptides are attractive candidates for drug development because of their low toxicity and relatively small binding interfaces, making accurate protein-peptide binding prediction crucial. In this study, we propose a flexible transformer-based framework with mutual attention that integrates protein pocket structural information and can be instantiated with different pocket-structure encoders. Within this unified framework, we systematically compare three encoders: an attention-based SE(3)-Transformer, a geometric graph neural network ProtGVP, and the large-scale structure-based pretrained model ESM-IF1. Using rigorous data partitioning with strict separation of training and test sets, we show that incorporating pocket structural information consistently improves binding prediction over sequence-only models, with GVP-GNN providing particularly effective pocket representations and structure-based variants exhibiting superior robustness on previously unseen data. Yangkun Zheng, Ridi Wen, Haoyu Hua, Xiaoli Lu, Xiaoping Min |
IEEE Trans. Comput. Biol. Bioinform. | 3 |
| 2023 | More Than Capacity: Performance-oriented Evolution of Pangu in Alibaba
Qiang Li 0045, Qiao Xiang, Yuxin Wang 0003, Ridi Wen, Wenhui Yao, Shuqi Zhao, Zhaosheng Zhu, Huayong Wang, Shanyang Liu, Lulu Chen, Zhiwu Wu, Haonan Qiu, Derui Liu, Gexiao Tian, Shaozong Liu, Yaohui Wu, Zicheng Luo, Yuchao Shao, Junping Wu, Zheng Cao 0003, Zhongjie Wu, Jiaji Zhu, Jiwu Shu, Jiesheng Wu |
FAST | 5 |
| 2023 | Toward Reproducing Network Research Results Using Large Language ModelsabstractReproducing research results is important for the networking community. The current best practice typically resorts to: (1) looking for publicly available prototypes; (2) contacting the authors to get a private prototype; or (3) manually implementing a prototype following the description of the publication. However, most published network research does not have public prototypes and private ones are hard to get. As such, most reproducing efforts are spent on manual implementation based on the publications, which is both time and labor consuming and error-prone. In this paper, we boldly propose reproducing network research results using the emerging large language models (LLMs). We first prove its feasibility with a small-scale experiment, in which four students with essential networking knowledge each reproduces a different networking system published in prominent conferences and journals by prompt engineering ChatGPT. We report our observations and lessons and discuss future open research questions of this proposal. Qiao Xiang, Yuling Lin, Mingjun Fang, Bang Huang, Siyong Huang, Ridi Wen, Franck Le, Linghe Kong, Jiwu Shu |
HotNets | 6 |
| 2023 | Beyond a Centralized Verifier: Scaling Data Plane Checking via Distributed, On-Device VerificationabstractCentralized data plane verification (DPV) faces significant scalability issues in large networks (i.e., the verifier being a performance bottleneck and single point of failure and requiring a reliable management network). We tackle this scalability challenge by introducing Tulkun, a distributed, on-device DPV framework. Our key insight is that DPV can be transformed into a counting problem on a directed acyclic graph, which can be naturally decomposed into lightweight tasks executed at network devices, enabling fast data plane checking in networks of various scales and types. With this insight, Tulkun consists of (1) a declarative invariant specification language, (2) a planner that employs a novel data structure DPVNet to systematically decompose global verification into on-device counting tasks, (3) a distributed verification messaging (DVM) protocol that specifies how on-device verifiers efficiently communicate task results to jointly verify the invariants, and (4) a mechanism to verify invariant fault-tolerance with minimal involvement of the planner. Extensive experiments with real-world datasets (WAN/LAN/DC) show that Tulkun verifies a real, large DC in 41 seconds while others tools need minutes or up to tens of hours, and shows an up to 2355× speed up on 80% quantile of incremental verification with small overhead on commodity network devices. Qiao Xiang, Chenyang Huang 0005, Ridi Wen, Yuxin Wang 0003, Xiwen Fan, Zaoxing Liu, Linghe Kong, Dennis Duan, Franck Le |
SIGCOMM | 3 |
| 2022 | Network can check itself: scaling data plane checking via distributed, on-device verificationabstractCurrent data plane verification (DPV) tools employ a centralized architecture, where a server collects the data planes of all devices and verifies them. This architecture is inherently unscalable (i.e., requiring a reliable management network, incurring a long control path and making the server a single point of failure). In this paper, we tackle this scalability challenge of DPV from an architectural perspective. In particular, we circumvent the scalability bottleneck of centralized design and advocate for a distributed, on-device DPV framework. Our key insight is that DPV can be transformed into a counting problem on DAG, which can be naturally decomposed into lightweight tasks executed at network devices, enabling scalability. Evaluation shows that a prototype of this framework achieves scalable DPV under various settings, with little overhead on commodity network devices. Qiao Xiang, Ridi Wen, Chenyang Huang 0005, Yuxin Wang 0003, Franck Le |
HotNets | 2 |