Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Wei-Te Mark Ting
dblp:320/7462
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 52% Transfer learning and domain adaptation · 30% Efficient and distributed learning · 18% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures · 100% |
Topics — the 9 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation › test-time adaptation
test-time personalization |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Alfa: Attentive Low-Rank Filter Adaptation for Structure-Aware Cross-Domain Personalized Gaze Estimation · AAAI 2026 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference
bayesian inference |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | CoopMC: Algorithm-Architecture Co-Optimization for Markov Chain Monte Carlo Accelerators · HPCA 2022 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › monte carlo methods › markov chain monte carlo
gibbs sampling |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | CoopMC: Algorithm-Architecture Co-Optimization for Markov Chain Monte Carlo Accelerators · HPCA 2022 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › monte carlo methods
markov chain monte carlo |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | CoopMC: Algorithm-Architecture Co-Optimization for Markov Chain Monte Carlo Accelerators · HPCA 2022 |
Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures
machine learning accelerator |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | CoopMC: Algorithm-Architecture Co-Optimization for Markov Chain Monte Carlo Accelerators · HPCA 2022 |
Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures › scientific computing accelerator
MCMC accelerator |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | CoopMC: Algorithm-Architecture Co-Optimization for Markov Chain Monte Carlo Accelerators · HPCA 2022 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › parameter-efficient fine-tuning
low-rank adaptation |
0.3 | 1 | 2026 | Alfa: Attentive Low-Rank Filter Adaptation for Structure-Aware Cross-Domain Personalized Gaze Estimation · AAAI 2026 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
parameter-efficient fine-tuning |
0.3 | 1 | 2026 | Alfa: Attentive Low-Rank Filter Adaptation for Structure-Aware Cross-Domain Personalized Gaze Estimation · AAAI 2026 |
Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures
algorithm-hardware co-design |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | CoopMC: Algorithm-Architecture Co-Optimization for Markov Chain Monte Carlo Accelerators · HPCA 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
tree-based gibbs sampler · 1.1log-domain kernel fusion · 1.1dynamic normalization · 1.1LUT-based exponential kernel · 1.1singular value decomposition · 1.0low-rank adaptation · 1.0attention mechanism · 1.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Alfa: Attentive Low-Rank Filter Adaptation for Structure-Aware Cross-Domain Personalized Gaze EstimationabstractPre-trained gaze models learn to identify useful patterns commonly found across users, but subtle user-specific variations (i.e., eyelid shape or facial structure) can degrade model performance. Test-time personalization (TTP) adapts pre-trained models to these user-specific domain shifts using only a few unlabeled samples. Efficient fine-tuning is critical in performing this domain adaptation: data and computation resources can be limited-especially for on-device customization. While popular parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) methods address adaptation costs by updating only a small set of weights, they may not be taking full advantage of structures encoded in pre-trained filters. To more effectively leverage existing structures learned during pre-training, we reframe personalization as a process to reweight existing features rather than learning entirely new ones. We present Attentive Low-Rank Filter Adaptation (Alfa) to adapt gaze models by reweighting semantic patterns in pre-trained filters. With Alfa, singular value decomposition (SVD) extracts dominant spatial components that capture eye and facial characteristics across users. Via an attention mechanism, we need only a few unlabeled samples to adjust and reweight pre-trained structures, selectively amplifying those relevant to a target user. Alfa achieves the lowest average gaze errors across four cross-dataset gaze benchmarks, outperforming existing TTP methods and low-rank adaptation (LoRA)-based variants. We also show that Alfa's attentive low-rank methods can be applied to applications beyond vision, such as diffusion-based language models. He-Yen Hsieh, Wei-Te Mark Ting, H. T. Kung 0001 |
AAAI | 2 |
| 2025 | DFT Gaze: Distilled and Fine-Tuned Gaze Estimation for Personalization on Tiny DevicesabstractReal-time personalized gaze estimation on AR/VR devices requires both accuracy and efficiency, especially when adapting to individual users with limited personal data. This task is challenging due to low-latency requirements, the presence of dataset biases from dominant gaze directions, and risk of catastrophic forgetting during adaptation. We present Distilled and Fine-Tuned (DFT) Gaze, a lightweight model for personalized gaze estimation. Distilled from a larger teacher model, DFT Gaze reduces model size while retaining essential visual features through knowledge distillation, without relying on gaze-specific supervision. During fine-tuning, it integrates gaze-specific supervision with Adapters, reaching 281K parameters for efficient adaptation and online updates on edge devices. To mitigate dataset biases and reduce catastrophic forgetting, we introduce a clustering-based sampling that balances gaze distribution for better generalization and improves adaptation to individual gaze patterns, even with only 5 personal images. DFT Gaze outperforms state-of-the-art methods on the MPIIFaceGaze dataset for personalized gaze estimation. Despite having the smallest model size at 281K parameters, it maintains low gaze errors across other datasets, including MPIIGaze, OpenEDS2020, and AEA. At 10× smaller than its teacher model, DFT Gaze achieves fast inference, a low parameter count, and effective adaptation, making it well-suited for real-time applications in resource-constrained environments. He-Yen Hsieh, Ziyun Li 0001, Sai Qian Zhang, Wei-Te Mark Ting, Kao-Den Chang, Barbara De Salvo, Chiao Liu, H. T. Kung 0001 |
ICIP | 4 |
| 2022 | CoopMC: Algorithm-Architecture Co-Optimization for Markov Chain Monte Carlo AcceleratorsabstractBayesian machine learning is useful for applications that may make high-risk decisions with limited, noisy, or unlabeled data, as it provides great data efficiency and uncertainty estimation. Building on previous efforts, this work presents CoopMC, an algorithm-architecture co-optimization for developing more efficient MCMC-based Bayesian inference accelerators. CoopMC utilizes dynamic normalization (DyNorm), LUT-based exponential kernels (TableExp), and log-domain kernel fusion (LogFusion) to reduce computational precision and shrink ALU area by 7.5× without noticeable reduction in model performance. Also, a Tree-based Gibbs sampler (TreeSampler) improves hardware runtime from $\mathcal{O}$(N) to $\mathcal{O}$(log(N)), an 8.7× speedup, and yields 1.9× better area efficiency than the existing state-of-the-art Gibbs sampling architecture. These methods have been tested on 10 diverse workloads using 3 different types of Bayesian models, demonstrating applicability to many Bayesian algorithms. In an end-to-end case study, these optimizations achieve a 33% logic area reduction, 62% power reduction, and 1.53× speedup over previous state-of-the-art end-to-end MCMC accelerators. Yuji Chai, Glenn G. Ko, Wei-Te Mark Ting, Luke Bailey, David Brooks 0001, Gu-Yeon Wei |
HPCA | 3 |