Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Antonello Paolino

dblp:320/7781 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0003-4077-6420ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 3 · 3 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Legged, aerial and field robots · 79% Motion planning and robot control · 21%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Mathematical optimization · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots › aerial robots
aerial robot design
0.812024
Co-Design Optimisation of Morphing Topology and Control of Winged Drones · ICRA 2024
Mathematical optimization
multi-objective optimization
0.212024
Co-Design Optimisation of Morphing Topology and Control of Winged Drones · ICRA 2024
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control › nonlinear control
feedback linearization
0.212022
Centroidal Aerodynamic Modeling and Control of Flying Multibody Robots · ICRA 2022
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control › nonlinear control
gain scheduling
0.212022
Centroidal Aerodynamic Modeling and Control of Flying Multibody Robots · ICRA 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

trajectory optimization · 1.5multi-objective constraint-based optimization · 1.5gain scheduling · 0.6feedback linearization · 0.6computational fluid dynamics · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Co-Design Optimisation of Morphing Topology and Control of Winged Drones
abstract
The design and control of winged aircraft and drones is an iterative process aimed at identifying a compromise of mission-specific costs and constraints. When agility is required, shape-shifting (morphing) drones represent an efficient solution. However, morphing drones require the addition of actuated joints that increase the topology and control coupling, making the design process more complex. We propose a co-design optimisation method that assists the engineers by proposing a morphing drone’s conceptual design that includes topology, actuation, morphing strategy, and controller parameters. The method consists of applying multi-objective constraint-based optimisation to a multi-body winged drone with trajectory optimisation to solve the motion intelligence problem under diverse flight mission requirements, such as energy consumption and mission completion time. We show that co-designed morphing drones outperform fixed-winged drones in terms of energy efficiency and mission time, suggesting that the proposed co-design method could be a useful addition to the aircraft engineering toolbox.
Fabio Bergonti, Gabriele Nava, Valentin Wüest, Antonello Paolino, Giuseppe L'Erario, Daniele Pucci, Dario Floreano
ICRA4
2024 From CAD to URDF: Co-Design of a Jet-Powered Humanoid Robot Including CAD Geometry
abstract
Co-design optimization strategies usually rely on simplified robot models extracted from CAD. While these models are useful for optimizing geometrical and inertial parameters for robot control, they might overlook important details essential for prototyping the optimized mechanical design. For instance, they may not account for mechanical stresses exerted on the optimized geometries and the complexity of assembly-level design. In this paper, we introduce a co-design framework aimed at improving both the control performance and mechanical design of our robot. Specifically, we identify the robot links that significantly influence control performance. The geometric characteristics of these links are parameterized and optimized using a multi-objective evolutionary algorithm to achieve optimal control performance. Additionally, an automated Finite Element Method (FEM) analysis is integrated into the framework to filter solutions not satisfying the required structural safety margin. We validate the framework by applying it to enhance the mechanical design for flight performance of the jet-powered humanoid robot iRonCub.
Punith Reddy Vanteddu, Gabriele Nava, Fabio Bergonti, Giuseppe L'Erario, Antonello Paolino, Daniele Pucci
IROS5
2022 Centroidal Aerodynamic Modeling and Control of Flying Multibody Robots
abstract
This paper presents a modeling and control frame-work for multibody flying robots subject to non-negligible aero-dynamic forces acting on the centroidal dynamics. First, aero-dynamic forces are calculated during robot flight in different operating conditions by means of Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) analysis. Then, analytical models of the aerodynamics coefficients are generated from the dataset collected with CFD analysis. The obtained simplified aerodynamic model is also used to improve the flying robot control design. We present two control strategies: compensating for the aerodynamic effects via feedback linearization and enforcing the controller robustness with gain-scheduling. Simulation results on the jet-powered humanoid robot iRonCub validate the proposed approach.
Tong Hui, Antonello Paolino, Gabriele Nava, Giuseppe L'Erario, Fabio Di Natale, Fabio Bergonti, Francesco Braghin, Daniele Pucci
ICRA2