Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Ziyuan Fang
dblp:320/7859
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0002-5625-9906ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Security and privacy · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Digital forensics and information hiding · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Face, body and person analysis · 77% Video understanding and tracking · 23% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › Face, body and person analysis › face recognition
face representation |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | UniForensics: Face Forgery Detection via General Facial Representation · IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput. 2026 |
Digital forensics and information hiding
deepfake detection |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | UniForensics: Face Forgery Detection via General Facial Representation · IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput. 2026 |
Digital forensics and information hiding › forgery detection
face forgery detection |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | UniForensics: Face Forgery Detection via General Facial Representation · IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput. 2026 |
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking
spatio-temporal analysis |
0.3 | 1 | 2026 | UniForensics: Face Forgery Detection via General Facial Representation · IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput. 2026 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
transformer · 2.0self-supervised learning · 2.0contrastive learning · 2.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | UniForensics: Face Forgery Detection via General Facial RepresentationabstractThe rise of deepfakes has significantly heightened concerns for privacy and the authenticity of digital media, bringing widespread attention to face forgery detection. Previous deepfake detection methods mostly depend on low-level textural features vulnerable to perturbations and fall short of detecting unseen forgery methods. In contrast, high-level semantic features are less susceptible to perturbations and not limited to forgery-specific artifacts, thus having stronger generalization. Motivated by this, we propose a detection method that utilizes high-level semantic features of faces to identify inconsistencies in temporal domain. We introduce UniForensics, a novel deepfake detection framework that leverages a transformer-based video classification network, initialized with a meta-functional face encoder for enriched facial representation. In this way, we can take advantage of both the powerful spatio-temporal model and the high-level semantic information of faces. Furthermore, to leverage easily accessible real face data and guide the model in focusing on spatio-temporal features, we design a Dynamic Video Self-Blending (DVSB) method to efficiently generate training samples with diverse spatio-temporal forgery traces using real facial videos. Based on this, we advance our framework with a two-stage training approach: The first stage employs a novel self-supervised contrastive learning, where we encourage the network to focus on forgery traces by impelling videos generated by the same forgery process to have similar representations. On the basis of the representation learned in the first stage, the second stage involves fine-tuning on face forgery detection dataset to build a deepfake detector. Extensive experiments validates that UniForensics outperforms existing face forgery detection methods in generalization ability and robustness. In particular, our method achieves 95.3% and 77.2% cross dataset AUC on the challenging Celeb-DFv2 and DFDC respectively. Code will be made publicly available. Ziyuan Fang, Tianyi Wei, Wenbo Zhou 0004, Zhanyi Wang, Weiming Zhang 0001, Nenghai Yu |
IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput. | 1 |
| 2023 | Automatic Evaluation of Chinese Short-Answer Questions Based on Structure of Observed Learning Outcomes TaxonomyabstractThis study aims to evaluate Chinese short-answer questions according to the Structure of Observed Learning Outcomes (SOLO) taxonomy, which divides students' responses into five levels, from prestructural to extended abstract. To automate the evaluation process, supervised classification was used. For this purpose, three deep-learning models were adopted: LSTM, C-LSTM, Nezha-BiLSTM. Results showed that the accuracy of LSTM was the lowest at 0.83, the accuracy of C-LSTM was 0.89, and the accuracy of Nezha-BiLSTM was the highest at 0.90. And the accuracy of each classification model is high in the prestructural and multistructural responses. The method proposed could help teachers perform scoring more efficiently. Ziyuan Fang, Shengquan Yu |
ICALT | 2 |